Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Social Medicine, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Department of Physical Education and Sports, Naval Academy - Brazilian Navy, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectious Disease, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Physiol Behav. 2021 Feb 1;229:113249. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113249. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
The compensatory effect of exercise on total volume of physical activity and food intake has been described as a possible explanation for the limited body weight loss observed during exercise interventions.
To investigate the effect of different exercise intensities on total volume of physical activity and energy intake amongst active men with overweight.
Young men with overweight from a naval academy (n = 72; mean ± SD, age 21 ± 2 years, BMI 27.9 ± 2.13 kg/m) were randomised to a control group (CG), moderate-intensity (MEG), or vigorous-intensity exercise group (VEG). MEG and VEG performed exercise sessions three times per week, for 60 min, during a 2-week period. Physical activity was assessed using triaxial accelerometers for 13 days. Energy intake was assessed at four time-points by 24-hour food recall. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using linear mixed effect models.
MEG and VEG presented a greater compensatory effect in the total volume of physical activity over time compared to CG, with a significant difference in the rate of change between VEG and CG (∆ = -250,503 counts vs. ∆ = -61,306 counts, respectively; p = 0.01), and MEG and CG (∆ = -253,336 counts vs. ∆ = -61,306 counts, respectively; p = 0.01). There was no difference between MEG and VEG (p = 0.97). Changes in energy intake were not different between groups (p = 0.18); however, MEG presented greater energy intake compared to CG (β=491 kcal/day; p = 0.01) and VEG (β=319 kcal/day; p = 0.07). VEG presented a greater reduction in body weight compared to MEG (-1.3 kg vs. -0.4 kg; p = 0.03) and CG (-1.3 kg vs. -0.6 kg; p = 0.07).
Two weeks of exercise promoted a compensatory effect in total volume of physical activity in active men with overweight, regardless of exercise intensity. The compensatory effect was not observed for energy intake, although there was a trend for higher absolute energy intake in the MEG. Consequently, individuals in the VEG showed greater reduction in body weight over the intervention period.
运动对体力活动总量和食物摄入的补偿效应已被描述为运动干预中观察到的体重减轻有限的可能解释。
研究不同运动强度对超重活跃男性体力活动总量和能量摄入的影响。
海军学院超重的年轻男性(n=72;平均±标准差,年龄 21±2 岁,BMI 27.9±2.13kg/m)被随机分为对照组(CG)、中等强度运动组(MEG)或剧烈强度运动组(VEG)。MEG 和 VEG 每周进行 3 次运动,每次 60 分钟,持续 2 周。使用三轴加速度计在 13 天内评估体力活动。通过 24 小时食物回忆在 4 个时间点评估能量摄入。使用线性混合效应模型进行意向治疗分析。
与 CG 相比,MEG 和 VEG 在体力活动总量上随时间呈现出更大的补偿效应,VEG 和 CG 之间的变化率存在显著差异(∆=-250503 计数与 ∆=-61306 计数,分别;p=0.01),以及 MEG 和 CG(∆=-253336 计数与 ∆=-61306 计数,分别;p=0.01)。MEG 和 VEG 之间没有差异(p=0.97)。各组之间能量摄入的变化没有差异(p=0.18);然而,MEG 与 CG(β=491kcal/天;p=0.01)和 VEG(β=319kcal/天;p=0.07)相比,能量摄入更高。VEG 与 MEG(-1.3kg 与-0.4kg;p=0.03)和 CG(-1.3kg 与-0.6kg;p=0.07)相比,体重减轻更多。
两周的运动促进了超重活跃男性体力活动总量的补偿效应,而与运动强度无关。虽然 MEG 组的绝对能量摄入有增加的趋势,但能量摄入没有观察到补偿效应。因此,VEG 组在干预期间体重减轻更多。