Department of Kinesiology. University of Virginia, Memorial Gymnasium Rm 206 210 Emmet St So, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Department of Kinesiology. University of Virginia, Memorial Gymnasium Rm 206 210 Emmet St So, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Jan;47:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.11.025. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
To assess the changes in patient strength and function from 4- to 6-month assessments following ACLR, determine relationships between changes in strength to changes in subjective function, and identify factors that predict patients that fail to increase in strength.
Prospective, Cohort Study.
Controlled Laboratory.
Forty-seven patients(27 female, 24.3 ± 11.1 years) completed a battery of performance assessments at approximately 4- and 6-months following primary ACLR (4.03 ±0 .49 and 6.46 ±0 .68 months).
Subjective scores and isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength were compared across visits. Patients were categorized per their ability to increase in strength beyond a previously defined threshold(0.22 Nm/kg). Binary logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of patients that failed to meet strength changes.
Patients demonstrated improvements in patient-reported outcomes and strength measures between visits(P's < 0.05). Higher age (B = -0.073, P = .039), lower pre-injury activity levels (B = 0.61, P = .022), and higher limb symmetry indexes (B = -0.044, P = .05) at 4-months were predictors of patients that did not achieve improvements in quadriceps strength between assessments.
From 4- to 6-months post-ACLR, increases in subjective function, strength and symmetry were observed. High quadriceps symmetry at interim assessments without consideration of the magnitude of strength values could overestimate recovery of quadriceps function.
评估 ACLR 后 4 至 6 个月时患者力量和功能的变化,确定力量变化与主观功能变化之间的关系,并确定无法增加力量的患者的预测因素。
前瞻性队列研究。
对照实验室。
47 名患者(27 名女性,24.3±11.1 岁)在 ACLR 后约 4 至 6 个月时完成了一系列表现评估(4.03±0.49 和 6.46±0.68 个月)。
在两次就诊时比较主观评分和等速膝关节屈肌和伸肌力量。根据患者是否能够超过先前定义的阈值(0.22 Nm/kg)增加力量来对患者进行分类。使用二项逻辑回归模型确定无法满足力量变化的患者的预测因素。
患者在就诊时表现出患者报告的结果和力量测量值的改善(P<0.05)。较高的年龄(B=-0.073,P=0.039)、较低的受伤前活动水平(B=0.61,P=0.022)和较高的肢体对称性指数(B=-0.044,P=0.05)在 4 个月时是患者在两次评估之间无法实现股四头肌力量改善的预测因素。
从 ACLR 后 4 至 6 个月,主观功能、力量和对称性都有所增加。中期评估时股四头肌对称性较高,而不考虑力量值的大小,可能会高估股四头肌功能的恢复。