Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Equine Vet J. 2021 Sep;53(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1111/evj.13390. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Commercial horse feeds use cereal grains and by-products; however, their effects on the caecal environment remain poorly characterised.
Characterise the effect of commonly used feed ingredients on caecal pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration.
6 × 6 Latin square.
Two days prior to the start of the study, 6 caecally cannulated Quarter horses were moved into individual stalls where Smooth bromegrass hay (brome) was offered at 2.0% BW/d split between 2 feedings (0600 and 1800). On day 0, caecal digesta was collected every 2 h for 12 h relative to the 0600 feeding to establish control values for horses consuming only brome (HAY). On day 1, horses began consuming their respective treatments which consisted of beet pulp (BP), maize (M), dehydrated alfalfa (A), oats (OAT), soybean hulls (SBH), or wheat middlings (WM) at 0.25% BW/d split into 2 feedings. On day 7 of each treatment period, caecal digesta was collected every 2 h for 12 h and analysed for pH and VFA. Data were analysed using mixed ANOVA with repeated measures, fixed effects of treatment and time and random effects of horse and period.
There was a main effect of hour (P ≤ .05) indicative of post-prandial shifts in caecal metabolites. There were no main effects of treatment on pH or VFA concentration (P ≥ .3). Effects of hour × treatment (P ≤ .04) were observed for all response variables. Regardless of treatment or hour, caecal pH remained well within normal limits. Three horses exhibited signs of lower oesophageal choke immediately after consumption of BP pellets.
Interactions between ingredients when mixed for formulation of a concentrate warrant further research. Furthermore, a short adaptation period was chosen to mimic common management practices.
Minimal differences in caecal fermentation parameters were detected when ingredients were fed at a common inclusion level.
商业马饲料使用谷物和副产品;然而,它们对盲肠环境的影响仍未得到很好的描述。
描述常用饲料成分对盲肠 pH 值和挥发性脂肪酸 (VFA) 浓度的影响。
6×6 拉丁方设计。
在研究开始前两天,将 6 头盲肠套管的夸特马移动到单独的畜栏中,每天分 2 次(0600 和 1800)提供 2.0% BW/d 的光滑布格grass 干草(brome)。在第 0 天,相对于 0600 次喂食,每 2 小时收集一次盲肠内容物,以确定仅食用 brome(HAY)的马匹的对照值。在第 1 天,马匹开始摄入各自的处理物,包括甜菜浆(BP)、玉米(M)、脱水紫花苜蓿(A)、燕麦(OAT)、大豆皮(SBH)或小麦麸(WM),以 0.25% BW/d 分 2 次喂食。在每个处理期的第 7 天,每 2 小时收集一次盲肠内容物,12 小时分析 pH 值和 VFA。数据采用混合方差分析,重复测量,固定处理和时间效应,随机效应为马和时期。
时间(P≤.05)有主要影响,提示盲肠代谢物餐后有变化。处理对 pH 值或 VFA 浓度无主要影响(P≥.3)。所有反应变量都观察到时间×处理的影响(P≤.04)。无论处理或时间如何,盲肠 pH 值均保持在正常范围内。3 匹马在食用 BP 颗粒后立即出现食管下阻塞的迹象。
在配制浓缩饲料时,成分之间的相互作用需要进一步研究。此外,选择了一个较短的适应期来模拟常见的管理实践。
在常用添加水平下,盲肠发酵参数差异很小。