Suppr超能文献

干草种类对马盲肠和粪便微生物组及发酵参数的影响。

Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses.

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2021 Jan 1;99(1). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa407.

Abstract

The effect of hay type on the microbiome of the equine gastrointestinal tract is relatively unexplored. Our objective was to characterize the cecal and fecal microbiome of mature horses consuming alfalfa or Smooth Bromegrass (brome) hay. Six cecally cannulated horses were used in a split-plot design run as a crossover in two periods. The whole plot treatment was ad libitum access to brome or alfalfa hay fed over two 21-d acclimation periods with subplots of sampling location (cecum and rectum) and sampling hour. Each acclimation period was followed by a 24-h collection period where cecal and fecal samples were collected every 3 h for analysis of pH and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Fecal and cecal samples were pooled and sent to a commercial lab (MR DNA, Shallowater, TX) for the amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq. The main effects of hay on VFA, pH, and taxonomic abundances were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4 with fixed effects of hay, hour, location, period, and all possible interactions and random effect of horse. Alpha and beta diversities were analyzed using the R Dame package. Horses fed alfalfa had greater fecal than cecal pH (P ≤ 0.05), whereas horses fed brome had greater cecal than fecal pH (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless of hay type, total VFA concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum than in feces, and alfalfa resulted in greater (P ≤ 0.05) VFA concentrations than brome in both sampling locations. Alpha diversity was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in fecal compared with cecal samples. Microbial community structure within each sampling location and hay type differed from one another (P ≤ 0.05). Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum compared with the rectum, regardless of hay type. Firmicutes and Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the feces compared with cecal samples of alfalfa-fed horses. In all, fermentation parameters and bacterial abundances were impacted by hay type and sampling location in the hindgut.

摘要

干草类型对马胃肠道微生物组的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们的目标是描述食用紫花苜蓿或光滑雀麦干草的成年马的盲肠和粪便微生物组。6 匹经盲肠套管的马在两个时期的交叉分割区组设计中作为一个交叉进行试验。主区组处理是自由采食,经过两个为期 21 天的适应期,用采样位置(盲肠和直肠)和采样时间的亚区组进行处理。每个适应期后进行 24 小时的采集期,每隔 3 小时采集一次盲肠和粪便样本,用于分析 pH 值和挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)。将粪便和盲肠样本混合,送到一家商业实验室(MR DNA,Shallowater,TX),扩增 16S rRNA 基因 V4 区,并使用 Illumina HiSeq 进行测序。使用 SAS 9.4 的 MIXED 过程分析干草对 VFA、pH 值和分类丰度的主要影响,固定效应包括干草、时间、位置、时期以及所有可能的交互作用,随机效应是马。使用 R Dame 软件包分析 alpha 和 beta 多样性。与盲肠相比,食用紫花苜蓿的马粪便的 pH 值更高(P≤0.05),而食用雀麦的马盲肠的 pH 值更高(P≤0.05)。无论干草类型如何,盲肠中的总 VFA 浓度都高于粪便(P≤0.05),而在两个采样位置,紫花苜蓿的 VFA 浓度都高于雀麦(P≤0.05)。与盲肠样本相比,粪便样本的 alpha 多样性更高(P≤0.05)。每个采样位置和干草类型内的微生物群落结构彼此不同(P≤0.05)。盲肠中厚壁菌门(Bacteroidetes)的丰度高于直肠(P≤0.05),与干草类型无关。盲肠中粪便中的拟杆菌门(Firmicutes)和拟杆菌门/厚壁菌门(Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes)的丰度高于紫花苜蓿喂养的马的盲肠样本(P≤0.05)。总之,盲肠中的发酵参数和细菌丰度受到干草类型和后肠采样位置的影响。

相似文献

4
Soybean hulls as an alternative feed for horses.大豆皮作为马的替代饲料。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Jun;82(6):1663-8. doi: 10.2527/2004.8261663x.
5
Caecal fermentation characteristics of commonly used feed ingredients.常用饲料原料的盲肠发酵特性。
Equine Vet J. 2021 Sep;53(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1111/evj.13390. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Oral iron exacerbates colitis and influences the intestinal microbiome.口服铁剂会加重结肠炎并影响肠道微生物组。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0202460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202460. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验