Nibbio A, Ruffenach L, Bruant-Rodier C, Robert E, Bodin F, Dissaux C
Service de chirurgie plastique, esthétique, reconstructrice et maxillo-faciale, hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
Service de chirurgie plastique, esthétique, reconstructrice et maxillo-faciale, hôpital de Hautepierre, hôpitaux universitaire de Strasbourg, 1, avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2021 Feb;66(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
In abdominal plastic surgery, umbilicus is frequently transposed, generating scars and shapes variating with the techniques used. Various umbilical transposition techniques have been described, all of them attempt to reproduce the "ideal" umbilicus. This study aimed to define the shape and the aesthetic results obtained with four different surgical procedures, in order to choose an "ideal" umbilical transposition technique.
This retrospective study analyzed the characteristics of transposed umbilicus, in 50 patients who had undergone abdominal dermolipectomy for aesthetic reason, after a loss of weight or in breast reconstruction by Deep-Inferior-Epigastric-Perforator. Four surgical procedures were chosen, which differed by their counter-incision shape in the abdominal flap (Y, inverted Y, de-epidermized round with horizontal incision or U), and the deep points position of umbilical docking (along a horizontal or vertical axis). Shape and depth were evaluated by a panel of experts. The global assessment was based on a double evaluation, by the surgical jury and the patients themselves.
The counter-incision type determined the umbilicus shape: triangular for the Y (60%) or inverted-Y (41%), round for the U (52%) and vertical oval (67%) or round (32%) for the de-epidermized circle. The deep points position influenced the umbilicus axis. Regarding the appreciation, the de-epidermized circle had the best results for surgeons in a significant way, and for patients (respectively 72% and 100% satisfied), followed by the inverted-Y (57% and 92%) and Y techniques (55% and 89%) and at last the U (50 and 75%).
Horizontal counter incision in a de-epidermized round, with two anchoring points on a vertical axis, generates vertical oval or round shaped umbilicus, considered attractive in the literature, and giving the highest aesthetic satisfaction for both surgeons and patients.
在腹部整形手术中,脐部常需移位,这会产生因所用技术而异的瘢痕和形状。已有多种脐部移位技术被描述,所有这些技术都试图重现“理想”的脐部形态。本研究旨在确定四种不同手术方法所获得的脐部形状及美学效果,以便选择一种“理想”的脐部移位技术。
本回顾性研究分析了50例因美容原因接受腹部皮肤切除术的患者,这些患者在减重后或通过腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣进行乳房重建后脐部移位的特征。选择了四种手术方法,它们在腹部皮瓣的相对切口形状(Y形、倒Y形、水平切口的去皮圆形或U形)以及脐部对接的深点位置(沿水平或垂直轴)上有所不同。形状和深度由一组专家进行评估。总体评估基于手术评审团和患者本人的双重评价。
相对切口类型决定了脐部形状:Y形(60%)或倒Y形(41%)为三角形,U形为圆形(52%),去皮圆形为垂直椭圆形(67%)或圆形(32%)。深点位置影响脐部轴线。在评价方面,去皮圆形对手术医生和患者都有显著的最佳效果(分别为72%和100%满意),其次是倒Y形(57%和92%)和Y形技术(55%和89%),最后是U形(50%和75%)。
在去皮圆形中采用水平相对切口,在垂直轴上有两个固定点,可产生垂直椭圆形或圆形的脐部,在文献中被认为具有吸引力,并且给手术医生和患者都带来了最高的美学满意度。