• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

劳动限制型残疾与代际经济流动性

Work-Limiting Disability and Intergenerational Economic Mobility.

作者信息

Jajtner Katie M

机构信息

Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin - Madison.

出版信息

Soc Sci Q. 2020 Sep;101(5):2001-2016. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12836. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/ssqu.12836
PMID:33223571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7676749/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether work-limiting disability may modify intergenerational economic mobility in the United States.

METHODS

Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, common metrics of intergenerational mobility are estimated by parent work-limiting disability. These include rank slope coefficients capturing persistence of socioeconomic status and absolute upward economic mobility capturing expected child outcomes.

RESULTS

Parent-child pairs with work-limiting disability experience five to twelve percentiles lower absolute economic mobility at the 25 percentile of parent income. More severe and/or chronic conditions have larger disparities and higher parent income is associated with smaller disparities. Women may experience larger mobility differences, while non-Hispanic black children may face a higher likelihood of parents experiencing work limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Work-limiting disability appears to modify children's economic opportunity. This contributes to the understanding of disparate access to opportunity in the United States while also identifying economic disadvantages associated with disability for subsequent generations.

摘要

目的

研究工作限制型残疾是否会改变美国的代际经济流动性。

方法

利用收入动态面板研究,通过父母的工作限制型残疾来估计代际流动性的常用指标。这些指标包括捕捉社会经济地位持续性的排名斜率系数以及捕捉子女预期结果的绝对向上经济流动性。

结果

父母患有工作限制型残疾的亲子对,在父母收入处于第25百分位时,其绝对经济流动性要低五到十二个百分点。更严重和/或慢性的疾病差异更大,而父母收入越高,差异越小。女性可能经历更大的流动性差异,而非西班牙裔黑人儿童的父母出现工作限制的可能性可能更高。

结论

工作限制型残疾似乎会改变子女的经济机会。这有助于理解美国机会获取的不平等,同时也识别出与残疾相关的后代经济劣势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/a0c2316a08cb/nihms-1639179-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/55b37286e156/nihms-1639179-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/de319ac07686/nihms-1639179-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/e3c32714ebbf/nihms-1639179-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/d0487c7ed134/nihms-1639179-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/9997b5139eac/nihms-1639179-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/c386afffd73b/nihms-1639179-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/02b0f112a4ef/nihms-1639179-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/a0c2316a08cb/nihms-1639179-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/55b37286e156/nihms-1639179-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/de319ac07686/nihms-1639179-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/e3c32714ebbf/nihms-1639179-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/d0487c7ed134/nihms-1639179-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/9997b5139eac/nihms-1639179-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/c386afffd73b/nihms-1639179-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/02b0f112a4ef/nihms-1639179-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5d6/7676749/a0c2316a08cb/nihms-1639179-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Work-Limiting Disability and Intergenerational Economic Mobility.劳动限制型残疾与代际经济流动性
Soc Sci Q. 2020 Sep;101(5):2001-2016. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12836. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
Absolute income mobility obscures marginalized children's disadvantages.绝对收入流动性掩盖了边缘化儿童的劣势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 18;121(25):e2321418121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321418121. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Racial disparities in the pattern of intergenerational neighbourhood mobility.代际邻里流动性模式中的种族差异。
Urban Stud. 2023 Feb;60(2):256-273. doi: 10.1177/00420980221094021. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
The power of the future: Intergenerational income mobility and child maltreatment in the United States.未来的力量:美国代际收入流动性与儿童虐待
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 4):105175. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105175. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
Intergenerational mobility for women and minorities in the United States.美国女性和少数族裔的代际流动。
Future Child. 2006 Fall;16(2):37-53. doi: 10.1353/foc.2006.0016.
6
Childhood Family Structure and Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States.美国儿童的家庭结构与代际收入流动性
Demography. 2017 Apr;54(2):541-569. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0564-4.
7
Americans overestimate the intergenerational persistence in income ranks.美国人高估了收入阶层的代际持续性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):13909-13914. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814688116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Geography of mobility and parenting behavior in low income families.流动儿童的地理分布与低收入家庭的育儿行为
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 4):105142. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105142. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Association between disparities in intergenerational economic mobility and cause-specific mortality among Black and White persons in the United States.美国黑人和白人代际经济流动性差距与特定病因死亡率之间的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;74:101998. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101998. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
The intergenerational transmission of mental and physical health in the United Kingdom.英国的精神和身体健康的代际传递。
J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;92:102805. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102805. Epub 2023 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional intergenerational mobility.多维代际流动。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:115966. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115966. Epub 2023 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Health of Adult Child Caregivers Vary by Employment Status in the United States?美国成年子女照料者的健康状况是否因就业状况而异?
J Aging Health. 2019 Oct;31(9):1631-1651. doi: 10.1177/0898264318782561. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Justification bias in self-reported disability: New evidence from panel data.自我报告残疾中的合理化偏差:面板数据的新证据。
J Health Econ. 2017 Jul;54:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 17.
3
The implications of selective attrition for estimates of intergenerational elasticity of family income.选择性损耗对家庭收入代际弹性估计的影响。
J Econ Inequal. 2015 Sep;13(3):351-372. doi: 10.1007/s10888-015-9297-z.
4
THE EDUCATION-HEALTH GRADIENT.教育-健康梯度。
Am Econ Rev. 2010 May;100(2):234-238. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.2.234.
5
Genetic mechanisms in the intergenerational transmission of health.健康代际传递中的遗传机制。
J Health Econ. 2014 May;35:132-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
The Influence of Early-Life Events on Human Capital, Health Status, and Labor Market Outcomes Over the Life Course().早年经历对人生历程中人力资本、健康状况及劳动力市场结果的影响()
B E J Econom Anal Policy. 2011 Sep 6;11(3). doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2521.
7
The effect of informal care on work and wages.非正式护理对工作和工资的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):240-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
8
The association between parent's health and the educational attainment of their children.父母的健康状况与子女受教育程度之间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Sep;75(5):932-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.028. Epub 2012 May 23.
9
Attrition in Models of Intergenerational Links Using the PSID with Extensions to Health and to Sibling Models.使用具有健康扩展和兄弟姐妹模型的PSID的代际联系模型中的损耗。
B E J Econom Anal Policy. 2011;11(3). doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.2868.
10
An examination of healthy aging across a conceptual continuum: prevalence estimates, demographic patterns, and validity.健康老龄化在概念连续体上的考察:流行率估计、人口统计学模式和有效性。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 Jun;67(7):783-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glr234. Epub 2012 Feb 24.