Vinnakota Dileep Nag, Kamatham Rekhalakshmi
Department of Prosthodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):228-236. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_283_19. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
The present systematic review aims to determine the evidence on the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on dental implants.
This secondary qualitative and quantitative research was done using a pre-specified question and inclusion criteria.
A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane. All the studies that assessed the effect of PPIs on dental implants were included, irrespective of the design. Literature review, letter to editors, short commentaries, and opinion articles were excluded.
A total of three publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All these included articles were retrospective cohort studies; the methodological quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A total of 452 implants were placed in 149 PPI users, whereas 6798 were positioned in 2241 nonusers. Of these, 43 and 212 implants failed in users and nonusers, respectively (odds ratio: 2.91, 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.11). The meta-analysis was performed using the statistical software Review Manager, and a fixed-effect model was used to obtain the odds ratio. The success rate of implants based on age, gender, smoking, and bone augmentation could be combined only from two studies, which revealed a considerable effect of these factors.
As far as the available evidence is considered, it seems as if the usage of PPI has a detrimental effect on the success of dental implants. This influence needs justification as none of the included studies segregated the data based on confounding factors. Hence, there is a need to conduct well-designed, prospective, randomized clinical trials with balanced confounding factors to derive a proper conclusion.
本系统评价旨在确定质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对牙种植体影响的证据。
本二次定性和定量研究采用预先设定的问题和纳入标准进行。
在PubMed、Ovid和Cochrane等电子数据库中进行系统检索。纳入所有评估PPI对牙种植体影响的研究,无论其设计如何。排除文献综述、致编辑的信、简短评论和观点文章。
共有3篇出版物符合纳入标准。所有纳入文章均为回顾性队列研究;使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估方法学质量。149名PPI使用者共植入452颗种植体,而2241名非使用者植入6798颗。其中,使用者和非使用者中分别有43颗和212颗种植体失败(优势比:2.91,95%置信区间:2.06 - 4.11)。使用统计软件Review Manager进行荟萃分析,并使用固定效应模型获得优势比。仅两项研究可综合基于年龄、性别、吸烟和骨增量的种植体成功率,结果显示这些因素有显著影响。
就现有证据而言,PPI的使用似乎对牙种植体的成功有不利影响。由于纳入的研究均未根据混杂因素对数据进行分类,这种影响需要进一步论证。因此,需要进行设计良好、前瞻性、随机临床试验,并平衡混杂因素以得出恰当结论。