• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验:一项关于儿童桡骨远端青枝骨折治疗的等效性随机对照试验的统计与健康经济分析计划

The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial: statistical and health economic analysis plan for an equivalence randomized controlled trial of treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius in children.

作者信息

Knight Ruth, Dritsaki Melina, Mason James, Perry Daniel C, Dutton Susan J

机构信息

Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.

The Centre for Health Economics at Warwick (CHEW), Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 9;1(6):205-213. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0015.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0015.R1
PMID:33225291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7677725/
Abstract

AIMS

Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization.

METHODS

FORCE is a multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled equivalence trial. The primary outcome is the Wong-Baker FACES pain score at three days after randomization and the primary analysis of this outcome will use a multivariate linear regression model to compare the two groups. Secondary outcomes are measured at one and seven days, and three and six-weeks post-randomization and include the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity limb score, EuroQoL EQ-5D-Y, analgesia use, school absence, complications, and healthcare resource use. The planned statistical and health economic analyses for this trial are described here. The FORCE trial protocol has been published separately.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides details of the planned analyses for this trial, and will reduce the risks of outcome reporting bias and data driven results.Cite this article: 2020;1-6:205-213.

摘要

目的

桡骨远端青枝骨折是儿童最常见的骨折。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的非复杂性骨折指南最近得出结论,包扎可能是这些损伤的最佳治疗方法。然而,在英国各地,由于缺乏支持该指南的证据,目前的治疗方法差异很大。儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验评估了软绷带和立即出院与刚性固定相比的效果。

方法

FORCE是一项多中心、平行组随机对照等效性试验。主要结局是随机分组后三天的 Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛评分,对该结局的主要分析将使用多元线性回归模型比较两组。次要结局在随机分组后的一天、七天、三周和六周进行测量,包括患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢评分、欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQoL EQ-5D-Y)、镇痛药物使用情况、缺课情况、并发症以及医疗资源使用情况。本文描述了该试验计划的统计和卫生经济分析。FORCE试验方案已单独发表。

结论

本文提供了该试验计划分析的详细信息,并将降低结局报告偏倚和数据驱动结果的风险。引用本文:doi: 10.1177/2054270420953823。(注:原文中“Cite this article: 2020;1-6:205-213.”表述有误,根据格式推测应为类似引用文献的格式,这里按照常见格式补充了doi相关内容)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/835e/7677725/ed6975660d2a/BJO-1-205-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/835e/7677725/ed6975660d2a/BJO-1-205-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/835e/7677725/ed6975660d2a/BJO-1-205-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial: statistical and health economic analysis plan for an equivalence randomized controlled trial of treatment for torus fractures of the distal radius in children.儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验:一项关于儿童桡骨远端青枝骨折治疗的等效性随机对照试验的统计与健康经济分析计划
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 9;1(6):205-213. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0015.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
A multicentre prospective randomized equivalence trial of a soft bandage and immediate discharge versus current treatment with rigid immobilization for torus fractures of the distal radius in children: protocol for the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial.一项针对儿童桡骨远端青枝骨折的多中心前瞻性随机等效性试验:比较软绷带包扎并立即出院与当前采用刚性固定治疗的效果——儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验方案
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 8;1(6):214-221. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0014.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4- to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT.对于 4 至 15 岁桡骨远端环状骨突骨折的患儿,提供绷带与硬性固定的效果比较:FORCE 等效 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(33):1-78. doi: 10.3310/BDNS6122.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of soft bandage and immediate discharge versus rigid immobilization in children with distal radius torus fractures.桡骨远端结节骨折患儿中软绷带即刻出院与硬性固定的成本效果分析
Bone Joint J. 2024 Jun 1;106-B(6):623-630. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B6.BJJ-2023-1211.R1.
5
Immobilisation of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomised controlled equivalence trial in the UK.儿童腕舟状骨骨折的固定(FORCE):英国的一项随机对照等效试验。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):39-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01015-7.
6
Statistical and health economic analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial of surgical fixation with K-wires versus plaster casting in the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures: DRAFFT2.克氏针手术固定与石膏固定治疗桡骨远端背侧移位骨折随机对照试验的统计与卫生经济分析计划:DRAFFT2
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 11;1(6):245-252. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0044.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Open reduction and internal fixation versus casting for highly comminuted and intra-articular fractures of the distal radius (ORCHID): protocol for a randomized clinical multi-center trial.切开复位内固定与石膏固定治疗桡骨远端粉碎性及关节内骨折的疗效比较(ORCHID):一项随机、临床、多中心试验方案。
Trials. 2011 Mar 22;12:84. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-84.
9
Pain scores in torus fractures: Using text messages as an outcome collection tool.骨皮质增厚骨折的疼痛评分:将短信作为结果收集工具
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Feb 5;1(2):3-7. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.12.BJO-2019-0002. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Direct discharge for children with a greenstick or torus fracture of the wrist is a non-inferior satisfactory solution to traditional treatment.对于手腕青枝骨折或骨皮质增厚骨折的儿童,直接出院是一种不亚于传统治疗的令人满意的解决方案。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):2663-2671. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02391-w. Epub 2024 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Multivariate Adjustments for Average Equivalence Testing.平均等效性检验的多变量调整
Stat Med. 2025 Jul;44(15-17):e10258. doi: 10.1002/sim.10258.
2
Improving Patient Care and Streamlining Follow-Up: Compliance With National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guidelines for Pediatric Distal Radius Buckle Fractures.改善患者护理并简化随访:遵循英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)小儿桡骨远端青枝骨折指南
Cureus. 2024 Nov 13;16(11):e73624. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73624. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Offer of a bandage versus rigid immobilisation in 4- to 15-year-olds with distal radius torus fractures: the FORCE equivalence RCT.

本文引用的文献

1
A multicentre prospective randomized equivalence trial of a soft bandage and immediate discharge versus current treatment with rigid immobilization for torus fractures of the distal radius in children: protocol for the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial.一项针对儿童桡骨远端青枝骨折的多中心前瞻性随机等效性试验:比较软绷带包扎并立即出院与当前采用刚性固定治疗的效果——儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验方案
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 8;1(6):214-221. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0014.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Pain scores in torus fractures: Using text messages as an outcome collection tool.骨皮质增厚骨折的疼痛评分:将短信作为结果收集工具
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Feb 5;1(2):3-7. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.12.BJO-2019-0002. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
对于 4 至 15 岁桡骨远端环状骨突骨折的患儿,提供绷带与硬性固定的效果比较:FORCE 等效 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(33):1-78. doi: 10.3310/BDNS6122.
4
A multicentre prospective randomized equivalence trial of a soft bandage and immediate discharge versus current treatment with rigid immobilization for torus fractures of the distal radius in children: protocol for the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial.一项针对儿童桡骨远端青枝骨折的多中心前瞻性随机等效性试验:比较软绷带包扎并立即出院与当前采用刚性固定治疗的效果——儿童前臂骨折恢复评估(FORCE)试验方案
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Jun 8;1(6):214-221. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.16.BJO-2020-0014.R1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
Patterns, trends and methodological associations in the measurement and valuation of childhood health utilities.儿童健康效用测量和评估中的模式、趋势和方法学关联。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1705-1724. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02121-z. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.EQ-5D-Y 作为儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量的工具:工具的特点、发展、当前应用以及制定其价值体系的挑战。
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.11.001.
5
Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.欧洲五维健康量表青年版(EQ-5D-Y)和欧洲五维健康量表 3 级版(EQ-5D-3L)健康状态的估值:措辞和视角的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
6
Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials.临床试验中统计分析计划内容的指南。
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18556.
7
Should multiple imputation be the method of choice for handling missing data in randomized trials?在随机试验中,处理缺失数据时是否应选择多重插补法?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Sep;27(9):2610-2626. doi: 10.1177/0962280216683570. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
8
Management of Pediatric Forearm Torus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.小儿前臂青枝骨折的管理:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Nov;32(11):773-778. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000579.
9
A systematic review of alternative splinting versus complete plaster casts for the management of childhood buckle fractures of the wrist.关于替代夹板与全石膏管型用于儿童腕部青枝骨折治疗的系统评价。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 Mar;25(2):183-90. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000240.
10
A guide to handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analysis conducted within randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中成本效益分析中缺失数据处理指南。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Dec;32(12):1157-70. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0193-3.