• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多特征学习方法预测心脏再同步治疗的反应。

Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method.

机构信息

Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI UMR 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.

Oslo University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;37(3):989-998. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02083-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10554-020-02083-1
PMID:33226549
Abstract

We hypothesized that a multiparametric evaluation, based on the combination of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters, could enhance the appraisal of the likelihood of reverse remodeling and prognosis of favorable clinical evolution to improve the response of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Three hundred and twenty-three heart failure patients were retrospectively included in this multicenter study. 221 patients (68%) were responders, defined by a decrease in left ventricle end-systolic volume ≥15% at the 6-month follow-up. In addition, strain data coming from echocardiography were analyzed with custom-made signal processing methods. Integrals of regional longitudinal strain signals from the beginning of the cardiac cycle to strain peak and to the instant of aortic valve closure were analyzed. QRS duration, septal flash and different other features manually extracted were also included in the analysis. The random forest (RF) method was applied to analyze the relative feature importance, to select the most significant features and to build an ensemble classifier with the objective of predicting response to CRT. The set of most significant features was composed of Septal Flash, E, E/A, E/EA, QRS, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and eight features extracted from strain curves. A Monte Carlo cross-validation method with 100 runs was applied, using, in each run, different random sets of 80% of patients for training and 20% for testing. Results show a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.809 with a standard deviation of 0.05. A multiparametric approach using a combination of echo-based parameters of left ventricular dyssynchrony and QRS duration helped to improve the prediction of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

摘要

我们假设,基于心电图和超声心动图参数的组合的多参数评估,可以增强对逆向重构可能性和有利临床转归的预测,以改善心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的反应。这项多中心研究回顾性纳入了 323 例心力衰竭患者。221 例(68%)患者为应答者,定义为 6 个月随访时左心室收缩末期容积减少≥15%。此外,还使用定制的信号处理方法分析来自超声心动图的应变数据。分析了从心动周期开始到应变峰值再到主动脉瓣关闭瞬间的局部纵向应变信号的积分。还包括 QRS 持续时间、室间隔闪烁和其他不同的手动提取特征。随机森林(RF)方法用于分析相对特征重要性,选择最重要的特征,并构建一个集成分类器,目的是预测 CRT 的反应。最重要的特征集由室间隔闪烁、E、E/A、E/EA、QRS、左心室舒张末期容积和从应变曲线中提取的 8 个特征组成。应用了具有 100 次运行的蒙特卡罗交叉验证方法,在每次运行中,使用不同的 80%患者的随机集进行训练,20%的患者进行测试。结果显示平均曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.809,标准偏差为 0.05。使用左心室不同步和 QRS 持续时间的超声心动图参数组合的多参数方法有助于改善对心脏再同步治疗反应的预测。

相似文献

1
Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method.使用多特征学习方法预测心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;37(3):989-998. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02083-1. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Pilot study using 3D-longitudinal strain computation in a multi-parametric approach for best selecting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.采用多参数方法进行三维纵向应变计算的初步研究,以最佳选择心脏再同步治疗的反应者。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017 Jun 17;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0107-6.
3
Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines.机器学习预测心脏再同步治疗反应:改善与现行指南比较。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007316. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007316. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
4
New Multiparametric Analysis of Cardiac Dyssynchrony: Machine Learning and Prediction of Response to CRT.心脏不同步的新多参数分析:机器学习与心脏再同步治疗反应预测
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;12(9):1887-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中机械性不同步的评估。
Dan Med J. 2014 Dec;61(12):B4981.
6
Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography.心室几何形状正则化的QRS时限预测心脏再同步治疗反应:基于心电图与超声心动图相互作用的机器学习
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;35(7):1221-1229. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01545-5. Epub 2019 May 18.
7
Importance of Systematic Right Ventricular Assessment in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Candidates: A Machine Learning Approach.重要性的系统右心室评估在心脏再同步治疗候选者:一种机器学习的方法。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 May;34(5):494-502. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
Echocardiography for prediction of 6-month and late response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: implementation of stress echocardiography and comparative assessment along with widely used dyssynchrony indices.超声心动图预测心脏再同步治疗6个月及晚期反应:负荷超声心动图的应用及与广泛使用的不同步指数的比较评估
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;35(2):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-01520-6. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.T波面积可预测左束支传导阻滞患者对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/jce.12549. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
10
Are changes in the extent of left ventricular dyssynchrony as assessed by speckle tracking associated with response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?通过斑点追踪评估的左心室不同步程度的变化是否与心脏再同步治疗的反应相关?
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;32(4):553-61. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0809-5. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive review on the role of advanced multimodality imaging.优化心脏再同步治疗:关于先进多模态成像作用的综合综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;11:1406899. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1406899. eCollection 2024.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure: Friend or Foe?心力衰竭中的人工智能:是友还是敌?
Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 19;14(1):145. doi: 10.3390/life14010145.
3
Artificial intelligence models in prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.超越心血管风险预测中的回归技术:应用机器学习解决分析挑战。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 14;38(23):1805-1814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302.
2
Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide.避免心脏再同步治疗无应答者:实用指南。
Eur Heart J. 2017 May 14;38(19):1463-1472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw270.
3
Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn.使用 scikit-learn 进行神经影像学的机器学习。
人工智能模型在预测心脏再同步治疗反应中的应用:系统评价。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):133-150. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10357-8. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
4
The saga of dyssynchrony imaging: Are we getting to the point.不同步成像的传奇故事:我们是否已到关键节点。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 31;10:1111538. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1111538. eCollection 2023.
5
Interpretable machine learning predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy responses from personalized biochemical and biomechanical features.可解释机器学习从个性化的生化和生物力学特征预测心脏再同步治疗反应。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02015-0.
6
Machine learning is an effective method to predict the 90-day prognosis of patients with transient ischemic attack and minor stroke.机器学习是预测短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中患者 90 天预后的有效方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 16;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01672-z.
7
Desynchronization Strain Patterns and Contractility in Left Bundle Branch Block through Computer Model Simulation.通过计算机模型模拟研究左束支传导阻滞中的去同步应变模式与收缩性
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Feb 6;9(2):53. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9020053.
8
Echocardiographic Advances in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.扩张型心肌病的超声心动图进展
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 25;10(23):5518. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235518.
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Feb 21;8:14. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2014.00014. eCollection 2014.