• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越心血管风险预测中的回归技术:应用机器学习解决分析挑战。

Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1104, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

Center for Predictive Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 14;38(23):1805-1814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302
PMID:27436868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5837244/
Abstract

Risk prediction plays an important role in clinical cardiology research. Traditionally, most risk models have been based on regression models. While useful and robust, these statistical methods are limited to using a small number of predictors which operate in the same way on everyone, and uniformly throughout their range. The purpose of this review is to illustrate the use of machine-learning methods for development of risk prediction models. Typically presented as black box approaches, most machine-learning methods are aimed at solving particular challenges that arise in data analysis that are not well addressed by typical regression approaches. To illustrate these challenges, as well as how different methods can address them, we consider trying to predicting mortality after diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. We use data derived from our institution's electronic health record and abstract data on 13 regularly measured laboratory markers. We walk through different challenges that arise in modelling these data and then introduce different machine-learning approaches. Finally, we discuss general issues in the application of machine-learning methods including tuning parameters, loss functions, variable importance, and missing data. Overall, this review serves as an introduction for those working on risk modelling to approach the diffuse field of machine learning.

摘要

风险预测在临床心脏病学研究中起着重要作用。传统上,大多数风险模型都是基于回归模型。虽然这些统计方法有用且稳健,但它们仅限于使用少数以相同方式在每个人身上以及在整个范围内都起作用的预测因子。本综述的目的是说明如何使用机器学习方法来开发风险预测模型。机器学习方法通常被表示为黑盒方法,旨在解决数据分析中出现的特定挑战,而这些挑战无法通过典型的回归方法很好地解决。为了说明这些挑战以及不同方法如何解决这些挑战,我们考虑尝试预测急性心肌梗死诊断后的死亡率。我们使用来自我们机构电子健康记录的数据和关于 13 个常规测量实验室标志物的摘要数据。我们逐步介绍在对这些数据进行建模时出现的不同挑战,然后引入不同的机器学习方法。最后,我们讨论了机器学习方法应用中的一些常见问题,包括调整参数、损失函数、变量重要性和缺失数据。总的来说,本综述旨在为从事风险建模的人员提供一个介绍,以了解机器学习这一广泛的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/d7b7c8be7761/ehw30204.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/b7277daf4568/ehw30201.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/e9dde0321113/ehw30202.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/900eaf227031/ehw30203.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/d7b7c8be7761/ehw30204.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/b7277daf4568/ehw30201.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/e9dde0321113/ehw30202.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/900eaf227031/ehw30203.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39fb/5837244/d7b7c8be7761/ehw30204.jpg

相似文献

1
Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.超越心血管风险预测中的回归技术:应用机器学习解决分析挑战。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 14;38(23):1805-1814. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302.
2
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
3
Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction Using Real-World Data: A Tool for Precision Medicine.贝叶斯网络在真实世界数据中的风险预测中的应用:精准医学的工具。
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
4
A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning.基于机器学习的数据驱动方法预测糖尿病和心血管疾病。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0918-5.
5
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants.使用自动化机器学习进行心血管疾病风险预测:对 423604 名英国生物库参与者的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0213653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213653. eCollection 2019.
6
Rise of the machines? Machine learning approaches and mental health: opportunities and challenges.机器的崛起?机器学习方法与心理健康:机遇与挑战。
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;213(3):509-510. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.105.
7
A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data.一种使用删失的事件发生时间数据进行风险预测的朴素贝叶斯机器学习方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Sep 20;34(21):2941-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.6526. Epub 2015 May 18.
8
Enhancing the prediction of acute kidney injury risk after percutaneous coronary intervention using machine learning techniques: A retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习技术提高经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性肾损伤风险的预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 27;15(11):e1002703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002703. eCollection 2018 Nov.
9
Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.利用大数据和机器学习方法从电子健康记录中准确预测高血压患者的冠心病:模型开发与性能评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 6;8(7):e17257. doi: 10.2196/17257.
10
Decision curve analysis confirms higher clinical utility of multi-domain versus single-domain prediction models in patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis.决策曲线分析证实,在接受开放性腹部治疗的腹膜炎患者中,多领域预测模型比单领域预测模型具有更高的临床实用性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02156-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Oxidized LDL in Clinical Research.利用统计和机器学习方法在临床研究中分析氧化型低密度脂蛋白。
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s12013-025-01837-9.
2
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury in Neurocritical Care: A Comparative Analysis of XGBoost, GBM, and Random Forest Algorithms.用于神经重症监护中急性肾损伤早期预测的机器学习模型的开发与验证:XGBoost、GBM和随机森林算法的比较分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;15(16):2061. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162061.
3
Diagnostic Prediction Models for Primary Care, Based on AI and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting mortality over different time horizons: which data elements are needed?预测不同时间范围内的死亡率:需要哪些数据元素?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):176-181. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw057. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
2
Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.利用电子健康记录数据开发风险预测模型的机遇与挑战:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Jan;24(1):198-208. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw042. Epub 2016 May 17.
3
Normal-Weight Central Obesity: Implications for Total and Cardiovascular Mortality.
基于人工智能和电子健康记录的基层医疗诊断预测模型:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 22;13:e62862. doi: 10.2196/62862.
4
Optimizing timing and cost-effective use of plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease.优化阿尔茨海默病血浆生物标志物的检测时机及成本效益应用。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Aug 20;17(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01851-2.
5
Construction of a predictive model for cognitive impairment among older adults in Northwest China.中国西北地区老年人认知障碍预测模型的构建
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jul 31;17:1487838. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1487838. eCollection 2025.
6
Development and multi-cohort validation of a machine learning-based simplified frailty assessment tool for clinical risk prediction.基于机器学习的简化衰弱评估工具用于临床风险预测的开发及多队列验证
J Transl Med. 2025 Aug 15;23(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06728-4.
7
SurgeryLSTM: a time-aware neural model for accurate and explainable length of stay prediction after spine surgery.手术长短期记忆网络(SurgeryLSTM):一种用于准确且可解释脊柱手术后住院时间预测的时间感知神经模型。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 25;8(4):ooaf079. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf079. eCollection 2025 Aug.
8
Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型分析重症监护病房中普通肝素给药后的活化部分凝血活酶时间预测因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328709. eCollection 2025.
9
Data-driven prediction of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in a nationwide study.一项全国性研究中基于数据驱动的心血管和脑血管疾病预测
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22585. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94888-0.
10
Deep learning for enhanced prediction of diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study on the diabetes complications data set.用于增强糖尿病视网膜病变预测的深度学习:对糖尿病并发症数据集的比较研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 16;12:1591832. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1591832. eCollection 2025.
正常体重中心性肥胖:对全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 1;163(11):827-35. doi: 10.7326/M14-2525. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Testing the Relative Performance of Data Adaptive Prediction Algorithms: A Generalized Test of Conditional Risk Differences.测试数据自适应预测算法的相对性能:条件风险差异的广义检验。
Int J Biostat. 2016 May 1;12(1):117-29. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0014.
5
Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.低事件数低维数据中风险预测的惩罚回归方法综述与评估
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 30;35(7):1159-77. doi: 10.1002/sim.6782. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
Effects of Different Missing Data Imputation Techniques on the Performance of Undiagnosed Diabetes Risk Prediction Models in a Mixed-Ancestry Population of South Africa.不同缺失数据插补技术对南非混合血统人群未诊断糖尿病风险预测模型性能的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0139210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139210. eCollection 2015.
7
How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events.当事件数量较少时,如何开发一个更准确的风险预测模型。
BMJ. 2015 Aug 11;351:h3868. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3868.
8
Statistical learning and selective inference.统计学习与选择性推断。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 23;112(25):7629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507583112.
9
Relation of black race between high density lipoprotein cholesterol content, high density lipoprotein particles and coronary events (from the Dallas Heart Study).黑人种族中高密度脂蛋白胆固醇含量、高密度脂蛋白颗粒与冠状动脉事件的关系(来自达拉斯心脏研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 1;115(7):890-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
10
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型的透明报告(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010.