• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 Lauren 的弥漫型胃癌到 WHO 的低黏附性癌。临床病理和预后特征。

From Lauren's diffuse gastric cancer to WHO's poorly cohesive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics.

机构信息

Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Cruces (OSI EE Cruces), SPAIN.

Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario de Cruces (OSI EE Cruces).

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2021 May;113(5):324-331. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7184/2020.

DOI:10.17235/reed.2020.7184/2020
PMID:33228367
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

since Lauren classified gastric cancer into intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and diffuse gastric carcinoma back in 1965, countless categorizations have been published that attempt to elucidate the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between histological subtypes.

OBJECTIVE

a retrospective study was performed of gastric cancer cases managed in a third-level site over ten years in order to compare subtypes between the most widely used classifications (Lauren and World Health Organization [WHO]).

METHODS

a comparative study of the most relevant clinicopathological characteristics and a multivariate survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

significant differences exist between histological subtypes in terms of age, gender, location, extension, stage and treatment received. A univariate overall survival analysis revealed better survival rates for intestinal-type adenocarcinoma as compared to diffuse carcinoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.405 [1.024-1.927]) according to the Lauren's classification. Furthermore, there was a better prognosis of mucinous carcinoma (HR: 0.378 [0.164-0.868]), though failing to prove a poorer prognosis of poorly cohesive (HR: 1.242 [0.878-1.757]) and signet cell (HR: 1.354 [0.792-2.314]) carcinomas, according to the WHO classification. In the multivariate overall survival analysis, the following poor prognosis factors were identified: male gender, local infiltration (T), nodal invasion (N) and received adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

although the various histological subtypes show significant clinicopathological differences, further studies are needed to compare them and clarify the prognostic relevance of each one.

摘要

简介

自劳伦(Lauren)于 1965 年将胃癌分为肠型腺癌和弥漫型胃癌以来,已经发表了无数分类方法,试图阐明组织学亚型之间的临床病理和预后差异。

目的

对三级医疗机构十年来管理的胃癌病例进行回顾性研究,以比较最广泛使用的分类(劳伦(Lauren)和世界卫生组织(WHO))之间的亚型。

方法

对最相关的临床病理特征进行比较研究,并进行多变量生存分析。

结果

在年龄、性别、部位、范围、分期和接受的治疗方面,组织学亚型之间存在显著差异。根据劳伦(Lauren)分类,肠型腺癌的总生存率优于弥漫型腺癌(危险比[HR]:1.405[1.024-1.927])。此外,黏液腺癌的预后较好(HR:0.378[0.164-0.868]),尽管根据 WHO 分类,未证明低黏附性(HR:1.242[0.878-1.757])和印戒细胞(HR:1.354[0.792-2.314])癌的预后较差。在多变量总生存分析中,确定了以下预后不良因素:男性、局部浸润(T)、淋巴结侵犯(N)和接受辅助治疗。

结论

尽管各种组织学亚型表现出显著的临床病理差异,但仍需要进一步研究来比较它们并阐明每种亚型的预后相关性。

相似文献

1
From Lauren's diffuse gastric cancer to WHO's poorly cohesive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics.从 Lauren 的弥漫型胃癌到 WHO 的低黏附性癌。临床病理和预后特征。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2021 May;113(5):324-331. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7184/2020.
2
Clinicopathological Variation of Lauren Classification in Gastric Cancer.胃癌中劳伦分类的临床病理变异
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Jan;22(1):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-9996-6. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
3
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of poorly cohesive cell subtype of gastric cancer.胃黏附不良细胞型胃癌的临床病理特征及预后。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;27(3):512-519. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02069-6. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
4
Gastric cancer: correlation between clinicopathological factors and survival of patients. II.胃癌:临床病理因素与患者生存率的相关性。II.
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50(2):185-94.
5
[Clinicopathologic features of gastric adenocarcinoma based on the revised Lauren's classification].基于修订版劳伦分类法的胃腺癌临床病理特征
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 8;47(7):486-491. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.07.002.
6
Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Mixed-Type T1a Gastric Cancer Based on Lauren's Classification.基于劳伦分类法的混合型T1a期胃癌的临床病理特征及预后
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):784-791. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5549-9. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
7
Differential prognostic implications of gastric adenocarcinoma based on Lauren's classification: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-based cohort study.基于劳伦分类法的胃腺癌的不同预后意义:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)的队列研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(8):646. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7953.
8
Is the recent WHO histological classification for gastric cancer helpful for application to endoscopic resection?世界卫生组织(WHO)最近的胃癌组织学分类对于应用于内镜切除是否有帮助?
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0538-4. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
[Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis on 42 patients with primary gastric adenosquamous cell carcinoma].42例原发性胃腺鳞癌患者的临床病理特征及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 25;20(2):207-212.
10
Subtraction of Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability genotypes from the Lauren histotypes: Combined molecular and histologic subtyping with clinicopathological and prognostic significance validated in a cohort of 1,248 cases.从劳伦组织学分型中减去 Epstein-Barr 病毒和微卫星不稳定性基因型:在 1248 例队列中验证的联合分子和组织学亚型与临床病理和预后意义。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Dec 15;145(12):3218-3230. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32215. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive analysis of risk factors and nomogram development for predicting hepatic metastasis following radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.食管胃交界腺癌根治性切除术后肝转移预测的危险因素综合分析及列线图构建
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 May 27;25(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04014-7.
2
Poorly cohesive gastric cancer with increased epithelial‑mesenchymal transition is associated with a poor prognosis.具有上皮-间质转化增加的低黏附性胃癌与预后不良相关。
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jul 3;28(3):420. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14554. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Classification and Grading Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinomas.
胃腺癌的分类和分级系统
Curr Health Sci J. 2022 Jul-Sep;48(3):284-291. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.48.03.06. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Family history of malignant tumor is a predictor of gastric cancer prognosis: Incorporation into a nomogram.恶性肿瘤家族史是胃癌预后的预测因素:纳入列线图。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30141. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030141.
5
Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification System for Gastric Cancer in a Western Population.Laurén 分类系统改良版肿瘤部位分类在西方人群胃癌中的临床相关性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3911-3920. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
6
PHLPP1 Overexpression was Associated With a Good Prognosis With Decreased AKT Activity in Gastric Cancer.PHLPP1 过表达与胃癌中 AKT 活性降低相关,提示预后良好。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338211067063. doi: 10.1177/15330338211067063.
7
FGFR2 alteration as a potential therapeutic target in poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma.FGFR2 改变可作为低黏附性胃癌的潜在治疗靶点。
J Transl Med. 2021 Sep 22;19(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03079-8.
8
Analysis of Gastric Cancer Transcriptome Allows the Identification of Histotype Specific Molecular Signatures With Prognostic Potential.胃癌转录组分析有助于识别具有预后潜力的组织学类型特异性分子特征。
Front Oncol. 2021 May 3;11:663771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.663771. eCollection 2021.