Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织(WHO)最近的胃癌组织学分类对于应用于内镜切除是否有帮助?

Is the recent WHO histological classification for gastric cancer helpful for application to endoscopic resection?

作者信息

Kim Yong Hoon, Kim Jie-Hyun, Kim HyunKi, Kim Hoguen, Lee Yong Chan, Lee Sang Kil, Shin Sung Kwan, Park Jun Chul, Chung Hyun Soo, Park Jae Jun, Youn Young Hoon, Park Hyojin, Noh Sung Hoon, Choi Seung Ho

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-720, Korea.

Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):869-75. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0538-4. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection is performed in undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer (UD-EGC), including poorly differentiated (PD) adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell (SRC) carcinoma. We previously found that different approaches are needed for PD adenocarcinoma and SRC carcinoma for curative resection. However, according to the 2010 WHO classification, diffuse-type PD adenocarcinoma and SRC carcinoma are categorized in the "poorly cohesive carcinomas." Thus, we assessed whether the WHO classification is helpful when endoscopic resection is performed for treatment of UD-EGC.

METHODS

We analyzed clinicopathological features of 1295 lesions with SRC carcinoma and PD adenocarcinoma treated by open surgery. We recategorized them into intestinal-type PD adenocarcinomas and poorly cohesive carcinomas (SRC carcinoma, diffuse-type PD adenocarcinoma). We also recategorized 176 lesions treated by endoscopic resection into intestinal-type PD adenocarcinomas and poorly cohesive carcinomas.

RESULTS

According to the open surgery data, the rates of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and lymphovascular invasion were significantly lower in SRC carcinoma than in diffuse-type and intestinal-type PD adenocarcinomas. The rates of LNM and lymphovascular invasion were significantly higher in diffuse-type PD adenocarcinoma than in SRC carcinoma. Endoscopic resection data showed no recurrence if the carcinoma was curatively resected. However, the commonest cause of noncurative resection was different in SRC carcinoma and PD adenocarcinoma. A positive lateral margin was the commonest cause in SRC carcinoma versus a positive vertical margin in both intestinal-type and diffuse-type PD adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical behavior differs in diffuse-type PD adenocarcinoma and SRC carcinoma. On the basis of LNM and outcomes of endoscopic resection, the recent WHO classification may not be helpful when endoscopic resection is performed for treatment of UD-EGC.

摘要

背景

内镜下切除术适用于未分化型早期胃癌(UD-EGC),包括低分化(PD)腺癌和印戒细胞(SRC)癌。我们之前发现,对于PD腺癌和SRC癌,需要采用不同的方法进行根治性切除。然而,根据2010年世界卫生组织(WHO)分类,弥漫型PD腺癌和SRC癌被归类为“低黏附性癌”。因此,我们评估了在对UD-EGC进行内镜下切除治疗时,WHO分类是否有帮助。

方法

我们分析了1295例接受开放手术治疗的SRC癌和PD腺癌病变的临床病理特征。我们将它们重新分类为肠型PD腺癌和低黏附性癌(SRC癌、弥漫型PD腺癌)。我们还将176例接受内镜下切除治疗的病变重新分类为肠型PD腺癌和低黏附性癌。

结果

根据开放手术数据,SRC癌的淋巴结转移(LNM)率和脉管侵犯率显著低于弥漫型和肠型PD腺癌。弥漫型PD腺癌的LNM率和脉管侵犯率显著高于SRC癌。内镜下切除数据显示,如果癌灶被根治性切除则无复发。然而,SRC癌和PD腺癌非根治性切除的最常见原因不同。切缘阳性是SRC癌非根治性切除的最常见原因,而在肠型和弥漫型PD腺癌中,垂直切缘阳性是最常见原因。

结论

弥漫型PD腺癌和SRC癌的临床行为不同。基于LNM和内镜下切除的结果,在对UD-EGC进行内镜下切除治疗时,最新的WHO分类可能并无帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验