• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多站点研究普通医疗服务中的跨专业团队合作。

A Multisite Study of Interprofessional Teamwork and Collaboration on General Medical Services.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;46(12):667-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.009
PMID:33228852
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teamwork and collaboration are essential to providing high-quality care. Prior research has found discrepancies between nurses' and physicians' perceptions in operating rooms, ICUs, and labor and delivery units. Less is known about health care professionals' perceptions of teamwork and collaboration on general medical services.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included nurses, nurse assistants, and physicians working on general medical services in four mid-sized hospitals. Researchers assessed teamwork climate using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire and asked respondents to rate the quality of collaboration experienced with their own and other professional categories.

RESULTS

Data for 380 participants (80 hospitalists, 13 resident physicians, 193 nurses, and 94 nurse assistants) were analyzed. Hospitalists had the highest median teamwork climate score (83.3, interquartile range [IQR] = 72.3-91.1), and nurses had the lowest (78.6, IQR = 69.6-87.5), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Median teamwork climate scores were significantly different across the four sites (highest = 83.3, IQR = 75.0-91.1; lowest = 76.8, IQR = 66.7-88.4; p = 0.003). Ratings of the quality of collaboration differed significantly based on professional category. Specifically, 63.3% (50/79) of hospitalists rated the quality of collaboration with nurses as high or very high, while 48.7% (94/193) of nurses rated the quality of collaboration with hospitalists as high or very high.

CONCLUSION

This study found significant differences in perceptions of teamwork climate across sites and in collaboration across professional categories on general medical services. Given the importance in providing high-quality care, leaders should consider conducting similar assessments to characterize teamwork and collaboration on general medical services within their own hospitals.

摘要

背景

团队合作对于提供高质量的医疗服务至关重要。先前的研究发现,手术室、重症监护病房和产房和分娩室的护士和医生对团队合作的看法存在差异。关于一般医疗服务中医疗保健专业人员对团队合作和协作的看法,了解较少。

方法

本横断面研究包括在四家中型医院从事一般医疗服务的护士、护士助理和医生。研究人员使用安全态度问卷评估团队合作氛围,并要求受访者对与自己和其他专业类别的合作质量进行评分。

结果

对 380 名参与者(80 名医院医生、13 名住院医师、193 名护士和 94 名护士助理)的数据进行了分析。医院医生的团队合作氛围得分中位数最高(83.3,四分位距 [IQR] = 72.3-91.1),护士得分最低(78.6,IQR = 69.6-87.5),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.42)。四个地点的团队合作氛围得分中位数差异有统计学意义(最高:83.3,IQR = 75.0-91.1;最低:76.8,IQR = 66.7-88.4;p = 0.003)。根据专业类别,合作质量的评价存在显著差异。具体而言,63.3%(50/79)的医院医生认为与护士的合作质量高或非常高,而 48.7%(94/193)的护士认为与医院医生的合作质量高或非常高。

结论

本研究发现,在一般医疗服务中,团队合作氛围和专业类别之间的协作存在显著差异。鉴于提供高质量医疗服务的重要性,领导者应考虑进行类似的评估,以描述其医院内一般医疗服务的团队合作和协作情况。

相似文献

1
A Multisite Study of Interprofessional Teamwork and Collaboration on General Medical Services.多站点研究普通医疗服务中的跨专业团队合作。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;46(12):667-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
Assessing Interprofessional Teamwork in Inpatient Medical Oncology Units.评估住院肿瘤医学单元中的跨专业团队合作。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):19-22. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001536. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
3
Improving teamwork: impact of structured interdisciplinary rounds on a medical teaching unit.改善团队合作:结构化跨学科查房对一个医学教学单位的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):826-32. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1345-6. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
4
Interprofessional team assessments of the patient safety climate in Swedish operating rooms: a cross-sectional survey.瑞典手术室患者安全氛围的跨专业团队评估:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 1;7(9):e015607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015607.
5
Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder.医生与护士之间的手术室团队协作:旁观者眼中的团队协作。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 May;202(5):746-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.017.
6
Improving perceptions of teamwork climate with the Veterans Health Administration medical team training program.通过退伍军人健康管理局医疗团队培训计划改善对团队合作氛围的认知。
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):480-4. doi: 10.1177/1062860611401653. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
7
Systematic simulation-based team training in a Swedish intensive care unit: a diverse response among critical care professions.系统仿真为基础的团队培训在瑞典的重症监护病房:在重症监护专业的不同反应。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):485-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000994. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Interprofessional collaboration between residents and nurses in general internal medicine: a qualitative study on behaviours enhancing teamwork quality.普通内科住院医师与护士之间的跨专业协作:一项关于提升团队合作质量行为的定性研究
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 25;9(4):e96160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096160. eCollection 2014.
9
CNE article: safety culture in Australian intensive care units: establishing a baseline for quality improvement.CNE 文章:澳大利亚重症监护病房的安全文化:为质量改进建立基准。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Mar;22(2):93-102. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013722.
10
Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution.在同一机构的重症监护病房中,对安全文化的认知存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251505.76026.CF.

引用本文的文献

1
Emerging lessons from experiences at transitions in care among hospitalised patients with cancer with postdischarge frequent emergency department use: a qualitative study using linked clinical and patient-reported interview data from Quebec, Canada.从加拿大魁北克省利用临床和患者报告访谈数据进行的链接研究中,了解到在癌症住院患者出院后频繁使用急诊方面的护理过渡期的经验教训:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 18;14(10):e085219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085219.