Komljenovic Janja
Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
High Educ (Dordr). 2022;83(1):119-135. doi: 10.1007/s10734-020-00639-7. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
Universities around the world are increasingly digitalising all of their operations, with the current COVID-19 pandemic speeding up otherwise steady developments. This article focuses on the political economy of higher education (HE) digitalisation and suggests a new research programme. I foreground three principal arguments, which are empirically, theoretically, and politically crucial for HE scholars. First, most literature is examining the impacts of digitalisation on the HE sector and its subjects alone. I argue that current changes in digitalising HE cannot be studied in isolation from broader changes in the global economy. Specifically, HE digitalisation is embedded in the expansion of the digital economy, which is marked by new forms of value extraction and rentiership. Second, the emerging research on the intersection of marketisation and digitalisation in HE seems to follow the theories of marketisation qua production and commodification. I argue that we need theories with better explanatory power in analysing the current digitalisation dynamics. I propose to move from commodification to assetisation, and from prices to rents. Finally, universities are digitalising in the time when the practice is superseding policy, and there is no regulation beyond the question of data privacy. However, digital data property is already a reality, governed by 'terms of use', and protected by the intellectual property rights regime. The current pandemic has led to 'emergency pedagogy', which has intensified overall digitalisation in the sector and is bypassing concerns of data value redistribution. I argue that we urgently need public scrutiny and political action to address issues of value extraction and redistribution in HE.
世界各地的大学正在日益将其所有业务数字化,当前的新冠疫情加速了原本就稳步推进的发展进程。本文聚焦于高等教育(HE)数字化的政治经济学,并提出一项新的研究计划。我提出三个主要观点,这些观点对于高等教育学者在实证、理论和政治层面都至关重要。首先,大多数文献仅考察数字化对高等教育部门及其主体的影响。我认为,当前高等教育数字化的变革不能脱离全球经济的更广泛变革来进行研究。具体而言,高等教育数字化嵌入数字经济的扩张之中,其特征是新的价值提取和寻租形式。其次,关于高等教育市场化与数字化交叉领域的新兴研究似乎遵循市场化即生产和商品化的理论。我认为,在分析当前的数字化动态时,我们需要具有更强解释力的理论。我提议从商品化转向资产化,从价格转向租金。最后,大学在实践正在超越政策且除了数据隐私问题之外没有其他监管的时代进行数字化。然而,数字数据财产已经成为现实,受“使用条款”约束,并受知识产权制度保护。当前的疫情导致了“应急教学法”,这加剧了该领域的整体数字化,并绕过了数据价值再分配的问题。我认为,我们迫切需要公众监督和政治行动来解决高等教育中的价值提取和再分配问题。