Suppr超能文献

脊髓小脑性共济失调的中枢运动传导时间:荟萃分析。

Central motor conduction time in spinocerebellar ataxia: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Key Laboratory of Hunan Province in Neurodegenerative Disorders, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Nov 20;12(24):25718-25729. doi: 10.18632/aging.104181.

Abstract

The dominantly inherited spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are a large class of neurodegenerative diseases. Transcranial magnetic stimulation has been used to evaluate the function of the pyramidal tract, and central motor conduction time (CMCT) is one index used to detect pyramidal tract dysfunction. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Eight eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. For upper limb CMCT, the mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) between the combined SCA group and the control group was 2.24 [1.76-2.72], while the mean differences (95% CIs) between the subtypes and the control group were as follows: 4.43 [3.58-5.28] for SCA1, 0.25 [-0.15,0.65] for SCA2, 1.04 [-0.37,2.46] for SCA3 and 0.49 [-0.29,1.28] for SCA6. Additionally, SCA1 significantly differed from SCA2 and SCA3 in terms of CMCT (P=0.0006 and P=0.010, respectively). We also compared lower limb CMCT between the SCA2 and control groups. The mean difference (95% CI) was 6.58 [4.49-8.67], which was clearly statistically significant. The differences in CMCT values among different subtypes suggests diverse pathological mechanisms. In general, CMCT is a promising objective index to judge the severity of disease deserving further investigation.

摘要

显性遗传性脊髓小脑共济失调(SCAs)是一大类神经退行性疾病。经颅磁刺激已被用于评估锥体束的功能,而中央运动传导时间(CMCT)是检测锥体束功能障碍的一个指标。我们对 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了全面检索。共有 8 项符合条件的研究纳入荟萃分析。对于上肢 CMCT,合并 SCA 组与对照组之间的平均差异(95%置信区间(CI))为 2.24 [1.76-2.72],而各亚型与对照组之间的平均差异(95% CIs)如下:SCA1 为 4.43 [3.58-5.28],SCA2 为 0.25 [-0.15,0.65],SCA3 为 1.04 [-0.37,2.46],SCA6 为 0.49 [-0.29,1.28]。此外,SCA1 在 CMCT 方面与 SCA2 和 SCA3 存在显著差异(P=0.0006 和 P=0.010)。我们还比较了 SCA2 与对照组之间的下肢 CMCT。平均差异(95% CI)为 6.58 [4.49-8.67],差异具有统计学意义。不同亚型之间 CMCT 值的差异提示存在不同的病理机制。总的来说,CMCT 是判断疾病严重程度的一个有前途的客观指标,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e596/7803510/f54355409f57/aging-12-104181-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验