Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, Monclair, New Jersey, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Nov 24;16(11):e1008376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008376. eCollection 2020 Nov.
The rapidly decreasing cost of gene sequencing has resulted in a deluge of genomic data from across the tree of life; however, outside a few model organism databases, genomic data are limited in their scientific impact because they are not accompanied by computable phenomic data. The majority of phenomic data are contained in countless small, heterogeneous phenotypic data sets that are very difficult or impossible to integrate at scale because of variable formats, lack of digitization, and linguistic problems. One powerful solution is to represent phenotypic data using data models with precise, computable semantics, but adoption of semantic standards for representing phenotypic data has been slow, especially in biodiversity and ecology. Some phenotypic and trait data are available in a semantic language from knowledge bases, but these are often not interoperable. In this review, we will compare and contrast existing ontology and data models, focusing on nonhuman phenotypes and traits. We discuss barriers to integration of phenotypic data and make recommendations for developing an operationally useful, semantically interoperable phenotypic data ecosystem.
基因测序成本的迅速降低导致了来自生命之树各个分支的基因组数据泛滥;然而,除了少数几个模式生物数据库之外,由于没有可计算的表型数据伴随,基因组数据在科学上的影响力有限。大多数表型数据包含在无数的小型、异构的表型数据集,由于格式多变、缺乏数字化和语言问题,这些数据集非常难以或不可能大规模整合。一个有力的解决方案是使用具有精确、可计算语义的数据模型来表示表型数据,但表型数据表示的语义标准的采用一直很缓慢,特别是在生物多样性和生态学领域。一些表型和特征数据可从知识库中以语义语言获得,但这些数据通常不具有互操作性。在这篇综述中,我们将比较和对比现有的本体和数据模型,重点关注非人类的表型和特征。我们讨论了整合表型数据的障碍,并为开发一个可操作的、语义互操作的表型数据生态系统提出了建议。