School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, 900 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, 951 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
Biol Lett. 2020 Nov;16(11):20200660. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0660. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
Conformist transmission is a cognitively simple decision-making process by which observers are disproportionately likely to follow the majority. It has been studied in multiple species because theory suggests it can create stable cultural variation. However, the current theory assumes that while conformist transmission favours the majority, it is otherwise unbiased and does not systematically transform information, even though such biases are widely documented. Here, we relax this assumption, requiring conformist observers to infer the size of the majority from finite observations of their group mates. Because such inference can be subject to bias, it can lead to the biased transformation of transmitted information. We find that when individuals are biased (even weakly) the capacity of conformist transmission to sustain traditions is reduced and, in many cases, removed entirely. This suggests that the emphasis on conformist transmission as a source of stable cultural variation may be misplaced.
从众传播是一种认知简单的决策过程,在此过程中,观察者极有可能跟随多数派。由于理论表明它可以产生稳定的文化变异,因此已经在多种物种中进行了研究。然而,当前的理论假设,虽然从众传播有利于多数派,但它在其他方面是无偏见的,不会系统地改变信息,尽管这种偏见被广泛记录。在这里,我们放宽了这一假设,要求从众观察者从对其群体伙伴的有限观察中推断多数派的规模。由于这种推断可能存在偏差,因此它可能导致所传递信息的有偏差的转变。我们发现,当个体存在偏差(即使是微弱的偏差)时,从众传播维持传统的能力会降低,在许多情况下,甚至完全消失。这表明,将从众传播作为稳定文化变异的来源可能是错误的。