Food Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Food Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Food Res Int. 2020 Nov;137:109374. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109374. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
Variability is inherent in biology and also substantial for microbial populations. In the context of food safety risk assessment, it refers to differences in the response of different bacterial strains (between-strain variability) and different cells (within-strain variability) to the same condition (e.g. inactivation treatment). However, its quantification based on empirical observations and its incorporation in predictive models is a challenge for both experimental design and (statistical) analysis. In this article we propose the use of multilevel models to quantify (different levels of) variability and uncertainty and include them in the predictions. As proof of concept, we analyse the microbial inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes to thermal treatments including different levels of variability (between-strain and within-strain) and uncertainty. The relationship between the microbial count and time was expressed using a (non-linear) Weibullian model. Moreover, we defined stochastic hypotheses to describe the different types of variation at the level of the kinetic parameters, as well as in the observations (microbial counts). The model parameters (kinetic parameters and variances) are estimated using Bayesian statistics. The multilevel approach was compared against an analogous, single-level model. The multilevel methodology shrinks extreme parameter estimates towards the mean according to uncertainty, thus mitigating overfitting. In addition, this approach enables to easily incorporate different levels of variation (between-strain and/or within-strain variability and/or uncertainty) in the predictions. On the other hand, multilevel (Bayesian) models are more complex to define, implement, analyse and communicate than single-level models. Nevertheless, their ability to incorporate different sources of variability in predictions make them very suitable for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment.
变异性是生物学固有的,也是微生物种群的重要特征。在食品安全风险评估的背景下,它是指不同细菌菌株(菌株间变异性)和不同细胞(菌株内变异性)对同一条件(如灭活处理)的反应差异。然而,基于经验观察对其进行量化,并将其纳入预测模型,无论是在实验设计还是(统计)分析方面,都是一个挑战。在本文中,我们提出使用多层次模型来量化(不同层次的)变异性和不确定性,并将其纳入预测中。作为概念验证,我们分析了李斯特菌对热处理(包括不同水平的变异性[菌株间和菌株内]和不确定性)的微生物失活动力学。微生物数量与时间之间的关系采用(非线性)威布尔模型表示。此外,我们定义了随机假设来描述动力学参数水平以及观察值(微生物计数)中的不同类型的变化。使用贝叶斯统计学估计模型参数(动力学参数和方差)。将多层次方法与类似的单层次模型进行了比较。多层次方法根据不确定性将极端参数估计值收缩到平均值,从而减轻了过拟合。此外,这种方法可以轻松地将不同水平的变化(菌株间和/或菌株内变异性和/或不确定性)纳入预测中。另一方面,多层次(贝叶斯)模型比单层次模型更复杂,定义、实现、分析和交流。然而,它们能够将不同来源的变异性纳入预测中,这使得它们非常适合定量微生物风险评估。