Smirni Daniela
Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):877. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10110877.
Studies on the structure of intelligence refer to two main theoretical models: the first one considers intelligence as a unitary construct, the second one assumes the involvement of a plurality of factors. Studies using Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (RCPM) tasks have often highlighted the involvement of different cognitive abilities and brain structures, but in the clinical setting, RCPM measurement continues to be used as a single score. The current study aimed to analyse the RCPM performance following qualitative clustering, in order to provide an interpretation of the intelligence assessment through a factorial criterion. The RCPM have been administered to a large group of typically developing children between 6 and 11 years of age. The sample was divided into twelve age groups, and the performance of each age group was shown. Three qualitative item clusters were identified through a factorial criterion. Data showed that performance on RCPM may arise from different cognitive abilities, starting from basic attentional skills up to the more complex ones that require perceptual or analogical reasoning. The qualitative parameters could provide more effective diagnostic and treatment suggestions than a single total score in the clinical setting, and may be crucial for focusing on strength and weakness in the intellectual functionality evaluation of children.
第一种将智力视为一种单一的结构,第二种则假定有多种因素的参与。使用瑞文彩色渐进矩阵(RCPM)任务的研究常常突出了不同认知能力和脑结构的参与,但在临床环境中,RCPM测量仍被用作单一分数。当前的研究旨在分析定性聚类后的RCPM表现,以便通过因子标准对智力评估作出解释。RCPM已被施测于一大组6至11岁发育正常的儿童。样本被分为十二个年龄组,并展示了每个年龄组的表现。通过因子标准确定了三个定性项目聚类。数据表明,RCPM的表现可能源于不同的认知能力,从基本的注意力技能到需要感知或类比推理的更复杂技能。在临床环境中,定性参数可能比单一总分提供更有效的诊断和治疗建议,并且对于关注儿童智力功能评估中的优势和劣势可能至关重要。