• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床同理心是什么?社区成员、大学生、癌症患者和医生的观点。

What is clinical empathy? Perspectives of community members, university students, cancer patients, and physicians.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.001
PMID:33234440
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore what undergraduates, community members, oncology patients, and physicians consider empathic behavior in a physician.

METHODS

150 undergraduates, 152 community members, 95 physicians, and 89 oncology patients rated 49 hypothetical physician behaviors for how well they fit their personal definition of physician empathy. Dimensions of empathy were explored and compared across groups.

RESULTS

Three dimensions of empathy were Conscientious and Reassuring, Relationship Oriented, and Emotionally Involved. Relationship Oriented was the most strongly endorsed, followed by Emotionally Involved, with Conscientious and Reassuring coming in last. There were no group differences for Conscientious and Reassuring, but the Relationship Oriented factor was more endorsed by the clinical groups (physicians and patients) than the non-clinical groups. The Emotionally Involved factor was endorsed by physicians notably more than by patients.

CONCLUSION

What is considered clinical empathy is not the same across individuals and stakeholder groups.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Physicians and patients differ in how much they include the physicians' emotionality and emotion-related actions in their definition of empathy. Communication training for physicians that emphasizes behaviors associated with empathy (listening, understanding a person's feelings and perspectives, and showing interest in and concern for the whole person) may enhance patients' perception of clinical empathy.

摘要

目的

探讨医学生、社区成员、肿瘤患者和医生对医生共情行为的看法。

方法

150 名医学生、152 名社区成员、95 名医生和 89 名肿瘤患者对 49 种假设的医生行为进行了评分,以评估这些行为与他们个人对医生同理心的定义的契合程度。探讨并比较了同理心的各个维度在不同群体中的差异。

结果

同理心的三个维度分别是:认真负责和安慰、以关系为导向、情感投入。以关系为导向的维度最受认可,其次是情感投入,而认真负责和安慰的维度则排名最后。在认真负责和安慰维度上,不同群体之间没有差异,但临床群体(医生和患者)比非临床群体更认可以关系为导向的因素。情感投入维度则是医生比患者更认可。

结论

不同个体和利益相关者群体对临床同理心的看法并不相同。

实践意义

医生和患者在同理心的定义中对医生的情感和与情感相关的行为的重视程度存在差异。为医生提供强调同理心相关行为(倾听、理解他人的感受和观点,以及对整个人表现出兴趣和关心)的沟通培训,可能会增强患者对临床同理心的感知。

相似文献

1
What is clinical empathy? Perspectives of community members, university students, cancer patients, and physicians.临床同理心是什么?社区成员、大学生、癌症患者和医生的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
What is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors.同理心是什么?肿瘤患者对富有同理心的临床医生行为的看法。
Cancer. 2021 Nov 15;127(22):4258-4265. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33834. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Physician empathy according to physicians: A multi-specialty qualitative analysis.医生眼中的医生同理心:多专科定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2425-2431. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.024. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
4
Lay Perspectives on Empathy in Patient-Physician Communication: An Online Experimental Study.患者-医生沟通中同理心的公众观点:一项在线实验研究。
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(6):1246-1255. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2210380. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician-Patient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives.从医生和患者的角度看医生的沟通和同理心能力对医患关系的影响。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Dec;29(4):849-860. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09844-1. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
Observing physicians acting with different levels of empathy modulates later assessed pain tolerance.观察医生表现出不同程度的同理心会调节之后评估的疼痛耐受力。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 May;27(2):434-448. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12553. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
7
The effect of physician self-disclosure on patient self-disclosure and patient perceptions of the physician.医生自我表露对患者自我表露和患者对医生看法的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2224-2231. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.030. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
Let's talk about empathy!让我们谈谈同理心!
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan;101(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach.肿瘤学中医生同理心的决定因素及患者报告的长期结局:一种结构方程建模方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
10
How does a physician's accurate understanding of a cancer patient's unmet needs contribute to patient perception of physician empathy?医生对癌症患者未满足需求的准确理解如何影响患者对医生同理心的感知?
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun;98(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Multidimensional Clinical Empathy Scale for healthcare professionals and students.医疗专业人员和学生多维临床同理心量表的开发与验证
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Aug 28;13:20503121251365011. doi: 10.1177/20503121251365011. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient and Practitioner Perspectives on the Definition and Measurement of Therapeutic Empathy: Qualitative Study.患者与从业者对治疗性同理心的定义及衡量的看法:定性研究
J Particip Med. 2025 Jul 31;17:e71610. doi: 10.2196/71610.
3
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Empathic Communication Coding System.
共情沟通编码系统的评分者内信度和评分者间信度。
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Mar 24;88(7):420-428. doi: 10.1177/03080226251314367. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Engaged curiosity: "Hot spots" for clinical reasoning in complex patient encounters.专注的好奇心:复杂患者诊疗过程中临床推理的“热点”
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 6;7:100408. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100408. eCollection 2025 Dec.
5
Patient's perceived empathy can predict doctor-patient relationship in medical interaction.患者感知到的同理心能够预测医疗互动中的医患关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 21;25(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07117-7.
6
Medical students' understanding of clinical empathy - a qualitative exploratory interview study.医学生对临床同理心的理解——一项质性探索性访谈研究
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 5;24(1):1422. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06428-5.
7
Generative artificial intelligence writing open notes: A mixed methods assessment of the functionality of GPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0.生成式人工智能撰写开放式病历:对GPT 3.5和GPT 4.0功能的混合方法评估
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 29;10:20552076241291384. doi: 10.1177/20552076241291384. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Introducing the ELPIS scale: a novel tool for measuring emotional empathy toward cancer patients.介绍 ELPIS 量表:一种用于测量对癌症患者情感同理心的新工具。
Med Oncol. 2024 Oct 21;41(11):294. doi: 10.1007/s12032-024-02537-9.
9
An Empathy and Arts Curriculum During a Pediatrics Clerkship: Impact on Student Empathy and Behavior.儿科学实习期间的同理心和艺术课程:对学生同理心和行为的影响。
MedEdPORTAL. 2024 Jul 12;20:11414. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11414. eCollection 2024.
10
Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review.严重疾病对话的核心能力:综合系统评价。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Oct;39(4):340-351. doi: 10.1177/08258597241245022. Epub 2024 Apr 1.