• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学中医生同理心的决定因素及患者报告的长期结局:一种结构方程建模方法。

Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach.

作者信息

Neumann Melanie, Wirtz Markus, Bollschweiler Elfriede, Mercer Stewart W, Warm Mathias, Wolf Jürgen, Pfaff Holger

机构信息

Centre for Health Services Research Cologne, Medical Department of the University of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003
PMID:17851016
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to explore patient- and physician-specific determinants of physician empathy (PE) and to analyse the influence of PE on patient-reported long-term outcomes in German cancer patients.

METHODS

A postal survey was administered to 710 cancer patients, who had been inpatients at the University Hospital Cologne (response rate 49.5%). PE was measured with the German translation of the consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure, and patient-reported long-term outcomes were assessed using the major (ICD-10) depression inventory (MDI) and the EORTC quality of life (Qol) questionnaire QLQ-C30. Hypotheses were tested by structural equation modelling.

RESULTS

PE had (a) a moderate indirect effect on "depression" and a smaller indirect effect on "socio-emotional-cognitive Qol" by affecting "desire for more information from the physician regarding findings and treatment options" and (b) a moderate indirect effect on "socio-emotional-cognitive Qol" and a smaller effect on "depression" via "desire for more information about health promotion". The determinant with the greatest importance was "patient-perceived general busyness of hospital staff": it had a strong negative influence on PE, indirectly influencing "desire for more information from the physician regarding findings and treatment options" and also patients' "depression".

CONCLUSION

PE seems to be an important pre-requisite for information giving by physicians and through this pathway having a preventive effect on depression and improving Qol. Conversely, physicians' stress negatively influences these relationships.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The research findings suggest that reducing physicians' stress at the organizational and individual may be required to enhance patient-physician communication. Empathy, as an outcome-relevant professional competence needs to be assessed and developed more intensively in medical students and physicians.

摘要

目的

本横断面研究旨在探讨医生同理心(PE)中患者及医生特定的决定因素,并分析PE对德国癌症患者报告的长期结局的影响。

方法

对710名曾在科隆大学医院住院的癌症患者进行了邮寄调查(回复率49.5%)。采用咨询与关系同理心(CARE)量表的德文译本测量PE,使用主要(ICD-10)抑郁量表(MDI)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量(Qol)问卷QLQ-C30评估患者报告的长期结局。通过结构方程模型检验假设。

结果

PE通过影响“希望医生提供更多关于检查结果和治疗方案的信息”,对“抑郁”有中度间接影响,对“社会情感认知生活质量”有较小间接影响;并且通过“希望获得更多关于健康促进的信息”,对“社会情感认知生活质量”有中度间接影响,对“抑郁”有较小影响。最重要的决定因素是“患者感知到的医院工作人员总体忙碌程度”:它对PE有强烈负面影响,间接影响“希望医生提供更多关于检查结果和治疗方案的信息”以及患者的“抑郁”。

结论

PE似乎是医生提供信息的重要前提条件,并通过此途径对抑郁起到预防作用并改善生活质量。相反,医生的压力对这些关系有负面影响。

实践意义

研究结果表明,可能需要在组织和个人层面减轻医生的压力,以加强医患沟通。同理心作为一种与结局相关的专业能力,需要在医学生和医生中更深入地评估和培养。

相似文献

1
Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach.肿瘤学中医生同理心的决定因素及患者报告的长期结局:一种结构方程建模方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Dec;69(1-3):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
2
The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: a study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insurance.财务激励对医生同理心的影响:来自私人和法定健康保险患者视角的研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Aug;84(2):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
3
General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling.苏格兰社会经济高度贫困地区初级医疗中全科医生的同理心、患者赋能与患者报告结局——一项使用结构方程模型的前瞻性试点研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):240-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.022.
4
Patient-doctor interaction in rehabilitation: the relationship between perceived interaction quality and long-term treatment results.康复中的医患互动:感知互动质量与长期治疗效果的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Sep;76(3):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.031. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
5
Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?患者参与专科医疗会诊:医生以患者为中心的沟通是否重要?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Mar;65(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.011. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
6
Quality of life in adult survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症成年幸存者的生活质量。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):220-6. doi: 10.1177/1043454207303885.
7
Agreement in patient-physician communication in primary care: a study from Central and Eastern Europe.初级保健中患者与医生沟通的一致性:来自中东欧的一项研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Nov;73(2):246-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.034.
8
Influences on patients' ratings of physicians: Physicians demographics and personality.对患者对医生评分的影响:医生的人口统计学特征和个性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Feb;65(2):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
9
Discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and practices during pelvic examinations in Taiwan.台湾地区妇科检查中医师认知与实际操作之间的差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jan;74(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
10
Relationships between scores on the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study.医生共情杰斐逊量表得分、患者对医生共情的认知以及患者人文关怀方法之间的关系:一项效度研究
Med Sci Monit. 2007 Jul;13(7):CR291-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Empathy and cultural competence remains stable for medical students: do the humanities have an effect?医学生的同理心和文化能力保持稳定:人文学科有影响吗?
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06040-7.
2
Comparative study of the relationship between empathy and motivation among undergraduate students of new curriculum and old curriculum.新课程与旧课程本科学生同理心与动机关系的比较研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Sep;13(9):3892-3896. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_433_24. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
The impact of compassion-based interventions on perioperative anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
基于同情的干预对围手术期焦虑和抑郁的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Nov 15;365:476-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.08.110. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
4
Online vs. face-to-face interactive communication education using video materials among healthcare college students: a pilot non-randomized controlled study.在线与面对面互动交流教育使用视频材料在医科大学生中:一项初步非随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05742-2.
5
Exploring the impact of compassion and leadership on patient safety and quality in healthcare systems: a narrative review.探讨同情心和领导力对医疗保健系统中患者安全和质量的影响:叙事性综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 7;13(Suppl 2):e002651. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002651.
6
The Association Between Well-Being and Empathy in Medical Residents: A Cross-Sectional Survey.医学住院医师的幸福感与同理心之间的关系:一项横断面调查。
J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Jul;30(7):691-697. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0116. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
7
How medical students experience empathy training? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Results from the "Empathize with me, doctor!" project.医学生如何体验共情训练?一项诠释现象学分析。“与我共情,医生!”项目的结果。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2017 Jun 22;6:111. doi: 10.15694/mep.2017.000111. eCollection 2017.
8
The trajectory of prognostic cognition in patients with advanced cancer: is the traditional advance care planning approach desirable for patients?晚期癌症患者预后认知的轨迹:传统的预先医疗照护计划方法是否适用于患者?
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 May 7;54(5):507-515. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae006.
9
The influence of "bad news" and "neutral/good news" on patients' perception of physician empathy during oncology consultations.“坏消息”和“中性/好消息”对肿瘤学咨询中患者对医生共情感知的影响。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6903. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6903. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
10
Pause.暂停。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Sep 17;8:176. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000176.1. eCollection 2019.