Suppr超能文献

经肝外侧支动脉给予载药微球的补充性经动脉化疗栓塞的疗效和安全性:不可切除肝细胞癌的治疗方法。

Efficacy and Safety of Supplemental Transarterial Chemoembolization Through Extrahepatic Collateral Arteries with Drug-eluting Beads: Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Nov 17;14:5029-5041. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S266470. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of supplement transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) through extrahepatic collateral (EHC) arteries for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 61 unresectable HCC patients with treatment-naïve EHC blood supplies who received TACE from January 2016 to March 2019 were enrolled; of these patients, 42 (68.9%) received DEB-TACE, and 19 (31.1%) received cTACE. The hepatic tumor feeding arteries were treated in the same TACE session if it presented. The tumor response, time-to-progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Safety was assessed based on the occurrence of liver function deterioration and major complications within three months after TACE.

RESULTS

DEB-TACE showed better efficacy than cTACE in the disease control rate (=0.001), overall response rate (=0.005), the TTP (eight months vsthree months, =0.002) and the OS (23.8 months vs nine months, =0.045). Nine patients in the DEB-TACE group and one patient in the cTACE group were downstaged to resection or liver transplantation (21.4% vs 5.3%, =0.151). DEB-TACE and cTACE have no difference in the acute and chronic liver toxicity. With regard to complications, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of both major (16.7% vs 21.1%, =0.72) and minor (57.1% vs 47.4%, =0.48) complications between DEB-TACE and cTACE.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE through EHC arteries has a potential therapeutic effect in the treatment of unresectable HCC, with comparable safety compared with cTACE.

摘要

目的

评估经肝外侧支循环(EHC)动脉补充载药微球 TACE(DEB-TACE)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 3 月期间接受 TACE 治疗且初次 EHC 供血的 61 例不可切除 HCC 患者;其中,42 例(68.9%)接受 DEB-TACE,19 例(31.1%)接受 cTACE。若存在,同一 TACE 治疗中会同时处理肝肿瘤供血动脉。分析肿瘤反应、无进展时间(TTP)和总生存期(OS)。安全性评估基于 TACE 后 3 个月内肝功能恶化和主要并发症的发生情况。

结果

DEB-TACE 在疾病控制率(=0.001)、总有效率(=0.005)、TTP(8 个月比 3 个月,=0.002)和 OS(23.8 个月比 9 个月,=0.045)方面优于 cTACE。DEB-TACE 组有 9 例患者和 cTACE 组有 1 例患者降期可接受手术切除或肝移植(21.4%比 5.3%,=0.151)。DEB-TACE 和 cTACE 在急性和慢性肝毒性方面无差异。关于并发症,DEB-TACE 和 cTACE 组主要(16.7%比 21.1%,=0.72)和次要(57.1%比 47.4%,=0.48)并发症的发生率无显著差异。

结论

DEB-TACE 经 EHC 动脉治疗不可切除 HCC 具有潜在疗效,与 cTACE 相比具有相当的安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fc0/7680099/26a30d727e29/DDDT-14-5029-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验