• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越健康赤字计数:在一个积累性脆弱性指数中检查赤字模式。

Beyond the Health Deficit Count: Examining Deficit Patterns in a Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Index.

机构信息

The Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):792-797. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16955. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.16955
PMID:33236789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8049510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Exploring deficit patterns among frail people may reveal subgroups of different prognostic importance.

DESIGN

Analysis of National Health and Aging Trends Study.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

Community dwelling older adults with mild to moderate frailty (deficit-accumulation frailty index (FI) of 0.25-0.40) (n = 1821).

MEASUREMENTS

Latent class analysis identified distinct clinical subgroups based on comorbidity (range: 0-10), National Health and Aging Trends Study dementia classification, and short physical performance battery (SPPB) (range: 0-12). Survival analyses compared 5-year mortality by subgroups.

RESULTS

Three latent classes existed: Class 1 (n = 831, mean FI = 0.30) had 2.7% probable dementia, high comorbidities (mean = 3.6), and low physical impairment (SPPB mean = 9.9); Class 2 (n = 734, mean FI = 0.32) had 6.9% probable dementia, low comorbidities (mean = 2.8), and moderate physical impairment (SPPB mean = 6.2); Class 3 (n = 256, mean FI = 0.34) had 20.7% probable dementia, low comorbidities (mean = 2.4), and high physical impairment (SPPB mean = 2.0). Compared to Class 1, Classes 2 and 3 experienced higher 5-year mortality (C2: 1.28 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.00-1.62); C3: 1.87 (95% CI = 1.29-2.73)).

CONCLUSION

Deficit patterns among the mild-to-moderately frail provide additional prognostic information and highlight opportunities for preventive interventions.

摘要

背景/目的:探索虚弱人群的缺陷模式可能揭示出不同预后重要性的亚组。

设计

国家健康老龄化趋势研究的分析。

设置

社区。

参与者

患有轻度至中度虚弱症的社区居住的老年人(缺陷累积虚弱指数(FI)为 0.25-0.40)(n=1821)。

测量

潜在类别分析根据合并症(范围:0-10)、国家健康老龄化趋势研究痴呆分类和简短身体表现电池(SPPB)(范围:0-12)确定了不同的临床亚组。生存分析比较了亚组的 5 年死亡率。

结果

存在三个潜在类别:第 1 类(n=831,平均 FI=0.30)有 2.7%的可能性患有痴呆症,合并症高(平均=3.6),身体损伤低(SPPB 平均=9.9);第 2 类(n=734,平均 FI=0.32)有 6.9%的可能性患有痴呆症,合并症低(平均=2.8),身体损伤中等(SPPB 平均=6.2);第 3 类(n=256,平均 FI=0.34)有 20.7%的可能性患有痴呆症,合并症低(平均=2.4),身体损伤高(SPPB 平均=2.0)。与第 1 类相比,第 2 类和第 3 类的 5 年死亡率更高(C2:1.28(95%置信区间(CI)=1.00-1.62);C3:1.87(95% CI=1.29-2.73))。

结论

轻度至中度虚弱人群的缺陷模式提供了额外的预后信息,并突出了预防干预的机会。

相似文献

1
Beyond the Health Deficit Count: Examining Deficit Patterns in a Deficit-Accumulation Frailty Index.超越健康赤字计数:在一个积累性脆弱性指数中检查赤字模式。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Mar;69(3):792-797. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16955. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
2
Changes in a Frailty Index and Association with Mortality.虚弱指数的变化及其与死亡率的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Apr;69(4):1057-1062. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17002. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
Geriatric Assessment Impairment Profiles and Mortality in Older Adults With Gastrointestinal Cancers: Latent Class Analysis of the CARE Registry.老年综合评估的失能谱与老年胃肠道肿瘤患者的死亡率:CARE 登记研究的潜在类别分析。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 May 1;79(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad273.
4
Assessing Risk for Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults: The Need to Include Both Physical Frailty and Cognition.评估老年人不良结局风险:身体虚弱和认知功能均需纳入考虑。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Mar;67(3):477-483. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15683. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
5
Physical status and frailty index in nursing home residents: Results from the INCUR study.养老院居民的身体状况和虚弱指数:INCUR 研究的结果。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Jan;74:72-76. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
Changes in Predictive Performance of a Frailty Index with Availability of Clinical Domains.临床领域的可用性对衰弱指数预测性能的影响变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1771-1777. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16436. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Frailty in Hospitalized Older Adults: Comparing Different Frailty Measures in Predicting Short- and Long-term Patient Outcomes.老年住院患者衰弱:比较不同衰弱测量指标在预测短期和长期患者结局中的作用。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May;19(5):450-457.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Development and validation of a frailty index in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam.阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究中衰弱指数的开发与验证。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Oct;29(5):927-933. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0689-0. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Frailty Predicts Dementia and Death in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care.虚弱预测长期护理中老年痴呆和死亡。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Jul;25(7):105007. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.118. Epub 2024 May 1.
10
Prevalence and 10-year outcomes of frailty in older adults in relation to deficit accumulation.老年人虚弱与缺陷积累的关系:患病率和 10 年结局。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):681-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02764.x. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Frailty in Cardiac Surgery-Assessment Tools, Impact on Outcomes, and Optimisation Strategies: A Narrative Review.心脏手术中的衰弱——评估工具、对手术结果的影响及优化策略:一篇叙述性综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Mar 31;12(4):127. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040127.
2
Impact of Pre-Existing Frailty on Cardiotoxicity Among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Therapy.既往虚弱对接受辅助治疗的乳腺癌患者心脏毒性的影响。
JACC CardioOncol. 2025 Feb;7(2):110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.10.012. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Geriatric Conditions Associated with Nonadherence to Antiretroviral Therapy Among Older People with HIV: The Importance of Frailty.老年艾滋病患者抗逆转录病毒治疗不依从与老年病的关系:衰弱的重要性。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022 Jun;36(6):226-235. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0040. Epub 2022 May 19.
4
Frailty and Differences in Self-Reported Sexual Functioning Among Older Females and Males in National Social life, Health and Aging Project.国家社会生活、健康与老龄化项目中老年人自我报告的性功能方面的虚弱状况及性别差异
J Aging Health. 2022 Aug-Sep;34(4-5):666-673. doi: 10.1177/08982643211053772. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. National Profile of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Alone, Physical Frailty Alone, and Both.美国认知障碍单独、身体虚弱单独和两者都有的老年人群体国家概况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2822-2830. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16769. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Measuring Frailty in Health Care Databases for Clinical Care and Research.在医疗保健数据库中测量衰弱以用于临床护理和研究。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Jun;24(2):62-74. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0002. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
3
Visualizing Domains of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments to Grasp Frailty Spectrum in Older Adults with a Radar Chart.使用雷达图可视化综合老年评估领域以把握老年人的衰弱谱
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Mar;24(1):55-56. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0013. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
4
Changes in Predictive Performance of a Frailty Index with Availability of Clinical Domains.临床领域的可用性对衰弱指数预测性能的影响变化。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1771-1777. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16436. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Predicting Mortality and Adverse Outcomes: Comparing the Frailty Index to General Prognostic Indices.预测死亡率和不良结局:将衰弱指数与一般预后指标进行比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1516-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05700-w. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Advance Care Planning: Social Isolation Matters.预先医疗照护计划:社会孤立不容忽视。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):841-846. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16287. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
7
Measuring Frailty in Administrative Claims Data: Comparative Performance of Four Claims-Based Frailty Measures in the U.S. Medicare Data.在行政索赔数据中测量虚弱程度:美国医疗保险数据中四种基于索赔的虚弱程度衡量标准的比较性能。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz224.
8
Effects of physical activity interventions in frail and prefrail community-dwelling people on frailty status, muscle strength, physical performance and muscle mass-a narrative review.体育活动干预对社区中体弱和准体弱人群的衰弱状态、肌肉力量、身体机能及肌肉质量的影响——一项叙述性综述
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 Jun;131(11-12):244-254. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1484-7. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
9
A Comprehensive Update on Treatment of Dementia.痴呆治疗的全面更新
Semin Neurol. 2019 Apr;39(2):167-178. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683408. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
10
Evaluation of Changes in Functional Status in the Year After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年功能状态变化的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):383-391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6738.