Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
Department of Nutrition, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, Guangdong, China.
Reprod Sci. 2021 Apr;28(4):1101-1111. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00388-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
We aimed at exploring the value of neutrophil and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as predictive risk markers for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) by conducting a retrospective case-control study and a systematic review and meta-analysis. This retrospective case-control study was conducted in an academic hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 and 133 cases of women with RPL and 140 control women. In parallel, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the value of NLR and neutrophil in RPL risk assessment. Neutrophil and NLR were higher in the women with RPL than those in the controls (median [interquartile range]: 4.32 [3.31-6.18] vs. 3.76 [2.78-4.81], p = 0.001; 2.17 [1.47-3.16] vs. 1.74 [1.40-2.34], p = 0.001). After the cut-off value of the neutrophil and NLR was determined to be 6.3 × 10/L and 3.16, the prevalence of RPL became significantly increased in the high-neutrophil and the high-NLR group compared to the low-neutrophil and the low-NLR group (76.3% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.001; 66.6% vs. 44.5%, p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that high-neutrophil and high-NLR were risk factors for RPL, with ORs of 4.06 (95% CI: 1.84-8.95) and 2.49 (95% CI: 1.31-4.71), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that high-neutrophil was a risk factor for RPL, with OR of 4.91 (95% CI: 1.66-14.50). Meta-analysis of 5 case-control studies (including the present study) indicated that increased neutrophil and NLR may be risk factors for RPL, with SMDs of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45-0.80) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.39-0.83). Based on current findings and the meta-analysis, this study indicated that neutrophil and NLR might be valuable for predicting RPL; more studies with large sample are needed to verify this conclusion. The mechanism of the association between neutrophil and RPL needs to be explored in further studies.
我们旨在通过回顾性病例对照研究和系统回顾与荟萃分析来探索中性粒细胞和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)作为复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)预测风险标志物的价值。这项回顾性病例对照研究于 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月在一家学术医院进行,共纳入 133 例 RPL 妇女和 140 例对照妇女。同时,我们对 NLR 和中性粒细胞在 RPL 风险评估中的价值进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。RPL 组妇女的中性粒细胞和 NLR 高于对照组(中位数[四分位数间距]:4.32[3.31-6.18]比 3.76[2.78-4.81],p=0.001;2.17[1.47-3.16]比 1.74[1.40-2.34],p=0.001)。确定中性粒细胞和 NLR 的截断值为 6.3×10/L 和 3.16 后,与低中性粒细胞和低 NLR 组相比,高中性粒细胞和高 NLR 组 RPL 的发生率显著增加(76.3%比 44.2%,p<0.001;66.6%比 44.5%,p<0.001)。单因素 logistic 回归分析表明,高中性粒细胞和高 NLR 是 RPL 的危险因素,OR 值分别为 4.06(95%CI:1.84-8.95)和 2.49(95%CI:1.31-4.71)。多因素 logistic 回归分析表明,高中性粒细胞是 RPL 的危险因素,OR 值为 4.91(95%CI:1.66-14.50)。对 5 项病例对照研究(包括本研究)的荟萃分析表明,增加的中性粒细胞和 NLR 可能是 RPL 的危险因素,SMD 值分别为 0.63(95%CI:0.45-0.80)和 0.61(95%CI:0.39-0.83)。基于目前的研究结果和荟萃分析,本研究表明中性粒细胞和 NLR 可能对预测 RPL 有价值;需要更多的大样本研究来验证这一结论。中性粒细胞与 RPL 之间的关联机制需要在进一步的研究中探索。