• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估农业集约化对南亚马孙地区自然栖息地和生物多样性的影响。

Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia.

机构信息

Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0225914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225914. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0225914
PMID:33237901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7688104/
Abstract

The ongoing trend toward agricultural intensification in Southern Amazonia makes it essential to explore the future impacts of this development on the extent of natural habitats and biodiversity. This type of analysis requires information on future pathways of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) under different socio-economic conditions and policy settings. For this purpose, the spatially explicit land-use change model LandSHIFT was applied to calculate a set of high-resolution land-use change scenarios for the Brazilian states Para and Mato Grosso. The period of the analysis were the years 2010-2030. The resulting land-use maps were combined with maps depicting vertebrate species diversity in order to examine the impact of natural habitat loss on species ranges as well as the overall LULCC-induced effect on vertebrate diversity as expressed by the Biodiversity Intactness Index (BII). The results of this study indicate a general decrease in biodiversity intactness in all investigated scenarios. However, agricultural intensification combined with diversified environmental protection policies show least impact of LULCC on vertebrate species richness and conservation of natural habitats compared to scenarios with low agricultural intensification or scenarios with less effective conservation policies.

摘要

在南亚马逊地区,农业集约化的持续趋势使得探索这种发展对自然栖息地和生物多样性范围的未来影响变得至关重要。这种分析需要有关在不同社会经济条件和政策设定下未来土地利用和土地覆盖变化(LULCC)途径的信息。为此,应用了具有空间明确性的土地利用变化模型 LandSHIFT,以计算巴西帕拉州和马托格罗索州一系列高分辨率的土地利用变化情景。分析的时间段为 2010 年至 2030 年。将得出的土地利用图与描绘脊椎动物物种多样性的地图相结合,以检查自然栖息地丧失对物种范围的影响,以及生物多样性完整指数(BII)所表达的整体 LULCC 对脊椎动物多样性的影响。这项研究的结果表明,在所有调查的情景中,生物多样性完整度普遍下降。然而,与农业集约化程度较低的情景或保护政策效果较差的情景相比,农业集约化与多样化的环境保护政策相结合,对脊椎动物物种丰富度和自然栖息地保护的 LULCC 影响最小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/db4388c691e4/pone.0225914.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/cf1e7e96579f/pone.0225914.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/e9c97b410560/pone.0225914.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/db4388c691e4/pone.0225914.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/cf1e7e96579f/pone.0225914.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/e9c97b410560/pone.0225914.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b4f/7688104/db4388c691e4/pone.0225914.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the effects of agricultural intensification on natural habitats and biodiversity in Southern Amazonia.评估农业集约化对南亚马孙地区自然栖息地和生物多样性的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0225914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225914. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective.评估农业集约化对生物多样性的影响:英国视角
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 27;363(1492):777-87. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2183.
3
Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.在开放的农产品市场中,加强牧场管理不足以缓解对保护优先地区的压力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3199-3213. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14272. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Low-intensity agricultural landscapes in Transylvania support high butterfly diversity: implications for conservation.特兰西瓦尼亚的低强度农业景观支持着丰富的蝴蝶多样性:对保护工作的启示。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 24;9(7):e103256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103256. eCollection 2014.
5
Winners and losers of national and global efforts to reconcile agricultural intensification and biodiversity conservation.国家和全球努力协调农业集约化和生物多样性保护的赢家和输家。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2212-2228. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14076. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Integral analysis of environmental and economic performance of combined agricultural intensification & bioenergy production in the Orinoquia region.奥里诺科地区农业集约化与生物能源联合生产的环境与经济绩效综合分析
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 1;303:114137. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114137. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
7
Can agricultural intensification help to conserve biodiversity? A scenario study for the African continent.农业集约化能否有助于保护生物多样性?以非洲大陆为例的情景研究。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Effects of future agricultural change scenarios on beneficial insects.未来农业变化情景对有益昆虫的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jul 1;265:110550. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110550. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.农业扩张的空间格局决定了对生物多样性和碳储存的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7402-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406485112.
10
Biodiversity loss along a gradient of deforestation in Amazonian agricultural landscapes.亚马逊农业景观中森林砍伐梯度上的生物多样性丧失。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1380-1391. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13206. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstructing Italy's rural landscape before the Great Acceleration: A geospatial baseline from the (1929).重建大加速之前的意大利乡村景观:基于1929年的地理空间基线。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jun 27;5:169. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.20343.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding interactive effects between habitat configuration and pesticide use for pollination: towards better informed landscape management.理解栖息地配置与授粉农药使用之间的交互作用:迈向更明智的景观管理。
Ecol Process. 2025;14(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13717-025-00587-z. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
3
Conversion of steppe to cropland increases spatial heterogeneity of soil functional genes.

本文引用的文献

1
The pitfalls of biodiversity proxies: Differences in richness patterns of birds, trees and understudied diversity across Amazonia.生物多样性代理的陷阱:亚马逊地区鸟类、树木和研究较少的多样性丰富度模式的差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 16;9(1):19205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55490-3.
2
Can agricultural intensification help to conserve biodiversity? A scenario study for the African continent.农业集约化能否有助于保护生物多样性?以非洲大陆为例的情景研究。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification.
草原开垦为农田会增加土壤功能基因的空间异质性。
ISME J. 2023 Nov;17(11):1872-1883. doi: 10.1038/s41396-023-01496-9. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
未来耕地扩张和集约化对生物多样性的威胁。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1129-1135. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment.土地利用是否使陆地生物多样性超出了行星边界?一项全球评估。
Science. 2016 Jul 15;353(6296):288-91. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2201.
5
Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation.人为干扰会使热带雨林的生物多样性丧失速度比毁林速度快一倍。
Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535(7610):144-7. doi: 10.1038/nature18326. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture.巴西农业的土地利用、扩展和集约化模式。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Aug;22(8):2887-903. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13314. Epub 2016 May 12.
7
Land-use change affects water recycling in Brazil's last agricultural frontier.土地利用变化影响巴西最后一个农业前沿地区的水再循环。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3405-13. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13298. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
8
Patterns of Vertebrate Diversity and Protection in Brazil.巴西脊椎动物的多样性与保护模式。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0145064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145064. eCollection 2015.
9
Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems.栖息地破碎化及其对地球生态系统的持久影响。
Sci Adv. 2015 Mar 20;1(2):e1500052. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500052. eCollection 2015 Mar.
10
Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil.巴西养牛生产系统的集约化:社会经济与环境的协同效应和风险
Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1255-63. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001566.