• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗精神病药恶性综合征:长效与口服抗精神病药治疗的结局:662 例病例报告的系统评价和汇总、患者水平分析。

Outcomes of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome With Depot Versus Oral Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of 662 Case Reports.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.

Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 24;82(1):20r13272. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20r13272.

DOI:10.4088/JCP.20r13272
PMID:33238083
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and pooled, patient-level analysis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) case reports and series compared NMS characteristics and outcomes during long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) versus oral antipsychotic (OAP) treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for articles in English from database inception until October 9, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Case reports with author-defined NMS during ongoing antipsychotic treatment or within 1 injection interval of LAIs in adults aged 18-65 years.

DATA EXTRACTION

Demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data were independently extracted following PRISMA guidelines. NMS severity was rated using the Francis-Yacoub scale. Characteristics and outcomes of NMS were compared when occurring during LAI versus OAP treatment, adjusting for significant between-group differences.

RESULTS

Of 662 reported cases (median age = 36 years, male = 61.2%), 122 (18.4%) involved LAIs (second-generation antipsychotic [SGA] LAIs [SGA-LAIs] = 10, 1.5%), whereas 540 (81.6%) involved OAPs (SGA-OAPs = 159, 24.0%). The 2 groups did not differ in age, illness duration, comorbidities, or presence or severity of NMS symptoms (median Francis-Yacoub score: LAIs = 26 vs OAPs = 23, P = .8276). Antipsychotic formulation was not significantly associated with longer duration of hospitalization (LAIs = 5.0 weeks vs OAPs = 3.8 weeks, P = .8322), post-NMS sequelae (LAIs = 8.8% vs OAPs = 7.0%, P = .7489), or death (LAIs = 10.7% vs OAPs = 6.7%, P = .0861). When different, post hoc confounder-adjusted models were used, duration of NMS (but not hospitalization for NMS) was longer with LAIs than with OAPs (median = 2.6 vs 1.8 weeks, P = .0339), driven by FGAs rather than SGAs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, plus the fact that only 10 published NMS cases exist with SGA-LAIs, should mitigate safety concerns regarding LAIs, but results should be interpreted cautiously since they are based on case reports.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和汇集的神经阻滞剂恶性综合征(NMS)病例报告和系列研究,比较了长效注射抗精神病药(LAI)与口服抗精神病药(OAP)治疗期间 NMS 的特征和结局。

数据来源

两名作者独立检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 数据库,检索了从数据库开始到 2018 年 10 月 9 日期间发表的英文文章。

研究选择

正在接受抗精神病药物治疗期间或 LAI 注射间隔内发生作者定义的 NMS 的病例报告,纳入年龄在 18-65 岁之间的成年人。

数据提取

按照 PRISMA 指南独立提取人口统计学、临床、治疗和结局数据。使用 Francis-Yacoub 量表评估 NMS 严重程度。比较 NMS 发生在 LAI 与 OAP 治疗时的特征和结局,并对组间显著差异进行调整。

结果

在 662 例报告病例中(中位年龄为 36 岁,男性占 61.2%),122 例(18.4%)涉及 LAI(第二代抗精神病药[SGAs]LAI[SGA-LAIs]为 10 例,占 1.5%),而 540 例(81.6%)涉及 OAP(SGAs-OAPs 为 159 例,占 24.0%)。这两组在年龄、疾病持续时间、合并症或 NMS 症状的存在或严重程度方面无差异(中位 Francis-Yacoub 评分:LAIs = 26 分 vs OAPs = 23 分,P =.8276)。抗精神病药制剂与住院时间延长无显著相关性(LAIs = 5.0 周 vs OAPs = 3.8 周,P =.8322)、NMS 后后遗症(LAIs = 8.8% vs OAPs = 7.0%,P =.7489)或死亡(LAIs = 10.7% vs OAPs = 6.7%,P =.0861)。当使用不同的、事后混杂因素调整的模型时,与 OAP 相比,LAI 治疗的 NMS 持续时间(但不是 NMS 住院时间)更长(中位数=2.6 周 vs 1.8 周,P =.0339),这主要是由 FGAs 而不是 SGAs 驱动的。

结论

这些数据,加上只有 10 例发表的 SGA-LAI 相关 NMS 病例存在,应该减轻人们对 LAI 的安全性担忧,但由于这些结果基于病例报告,因此应谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome With Depot Versus Oral Antipsychotics: A Systematic Review and Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of 662 Case Reports.抗精神病药恶性综合征:长效与口服抗精神病药治疗的结局:662 例病例报告的系统评价和汇总、患者水平分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 24;82(1):20r13272. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20r13272.
2
A systematic review and pooled, patient-level analysis of predictors of mortality in neuroleptic malignant syndrome.神经阻滞剂恶性综合征病死率的预测因素的系统评价和汇总患者水平分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Oct;144(4):329-341. doi: 10.1111/acps.13359. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Risk Factors, Incidence, and Outcomes of Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome on Long-Acting Injectable vs Oral Antipsychotics in a Nationwide Schizophrenia Cohort.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症患者的神经阻滞剂恶性综合征的风险因素、发生率和结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Oct 21;47(6):1621-1630. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab062.
4
Safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing the same antipsychotics.长效注射用抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物的安全性和耐受性:对比较相同抗精神病药物的随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Oct;176(2-3):220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
Adherence, health care utilization, and costs between long-acting injectable and oral antipsychotic medications in South Carolina Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划精神分裂症受益人与长效注射和口服抗精神病药物的依从性、医疗保健利用率和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jun;30(6):549-559. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.549.
6
Risk of discontinuation of antipsychotic long-acting injections vs. oral antipsychotics in real-life prescribing practice: a community-based study.现实处方实践中抗精神病长效注射剂与口服抗精神病药物停药风险的比较:一项基于社区的研究
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 May;135(5):429-438. doi: 10.1111/acps.12722. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Antipsychotic Adherence and Rehospitalization in Schizophrenia Patients Receiving Oral Versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Following Hospital Discharge.精神分裂症患者出院后接受口服与长效注射抗精神病药物治疗的抗精神病药依从性和再入院情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Sep;21(9):754-68. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.754.
8
Real-World Effectiveness of Long-Acting Injectable and Oral Antipsychotic Agents in US Medicare Patients with Schizophrenia.长效注射用和口服抗精神病药物在美国医疗保险计划中患有精神分裂症患者中的真实世界有效性
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):1251-1264. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03075-6. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
9
Efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable oral antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效注射用口服抗精神病药物治疗早期精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jun 2;14:20451253241257062. doi: 10.1177/20451253241257062. eCollection 2024.
10
Long-acting injectable vs oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.长效注射用抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物预防精神分裂症复发的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jan;40(1):192-213. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs150. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Young Man with Altered Mental Status, Rigidity, and Hyperthermia.一名伴有精神状态改变、强直和高热的青年男性。
Neurohospitalist. 2025 Jul 29:19418744251364117. doi: 10.1177/19418744251364117.
2
Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Initiation of Aripiprazole Lauroxil Using a 1-Day Initiation Regimen in Patients with Schizophrenia.在精神分裂症患者中采用阿立哌唑月桂醇酯1日起始方案起始治疗后的治疗模式及医疗资源利用情况
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03276-7.
3
When, Why and How to Re-challenge Clozapine in Schizophrenia Following Myocarditis.
心肌炎后何时、为何以及如何重新挑战氯氮平治疗精神分裂症。
CNS Drugs. 2024 Sep;38(9):671-696. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01100-4. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
4
The pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: How far have we come?精神分裂症的药物治疗:我们取得了多大进展?
PCN Rep. 2022 May 30;1(2):e13. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.13. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Antipsychotic-Related DRESS Syndrome: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.抗精神病药相关 DRESS 综合征:世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库个例安全报告分析。
Drug Saf. 2024 Aug;47(8):745-757. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01431-7. Epub 2024 May 9.
6
Catatonia-related adverse outcomes after long-acting injectable antipsychotics: Case series.长效注射用抗精神病药物治疗后与紧张症相关的不良结局:病例系列
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Jan 31;12:2050313X241229008. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241229008. eCollection 2024.
7
Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs Placebo and Their Oral Formulations in Acute Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled-Trials.长效第二代抗精神病药与安慰剂及其口服制剂治疗急性精神分裂症的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):132-144. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad089.
8
[Safety aspects during treatment with clozapine: : Adverse effects, titration, and therapeutic drug monitoring - a narrative review].[氯氮平治疗期间的安全问题:不良反应、滴定和治疗药物监测——一篇叙述性综述]
Neuropsychiatr. 2023 Sep;37(3):122-129. doi: 10.1007/s40211-023-00474-z. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
9
Delphi panel to obtain clinical consensus about using long-acting injectable antipsychotics to treat first-episode and early-phase schizophrenia: treatment goals and approaches to functional recovery.德尔菲小组就使用长效注射抗精神病药治疗首发和早期精神分裂症达成临床共识:治疗目标和功能恢复方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04928-0.
10
Delphi panel to obtain clinical consensus about using long-acting injectable antipsychotics to treat first-episode and early-phase schizophrenia: Treatment goals and approaches to functional recovery.德尔菲小组就使用长效注射用抗精神病药物治疗首发及早期精神分裂症达成临床共识:治疗目标及功能恢复方法。
Res Sq. 2023 Mar 8:rs.3.rs-2594278. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2594278/v1.