School of Law, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
School of Law, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou, 18 Xueyuan Street, Jianggan District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020 Nov 25;11(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-02013-x.
Attitudes towards human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in China have witnessed a significant shift in 2020 that can be attributed to China's policy guidance. For ethical reasons, stricter standards are adopted to curb related regulations and patent licensing. Through the introduction of policies, some research on hESCs has been recognized as legitimate and feasible to a certain standard and scope. In the subsequent practice of patent examination, the dual influence of policy support and public interest has led to a shift in the examination standards of China's intellectual property authority from "strict morality" to "ethical neutrality", implying limited recognition of hESCs' patentability. In view of the promotion of policy incentives for the transformation and application of corresponding research, there is considerable social demand to provide patent protection for research results. In this context, an adjustment of related regulations is illustrated in this revision, manifesting a partial shift in regulations towards a supportive stance consistent with policy.
2020 年,中国对人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)的态度发生了重大转变,这可以归因于中国的政策指导。出于伦理原因,采用更严格的标准来遏制相关法规和专利许可。通过政策的引入,hESC 的某些研究在一定的标准和范围内被认为是合法和可行的。在随后的专利审查实践中,政策支持和公共利益的双重影响导致中国知识产权局的审查标准从“严格的道德”转变为“伦理中立”,这意味着对 hESC 的可专利性的有限认可。鉴于促进相应研究的转化和应用的政策激励,为研究成果提供专利保护存在相当大的社会需求。在这种情况下,本修正案说明了相关法规的调整,体现了部分法规向符合政策的支持性立场的转变。