Uniportal versus Multiportal Thoracoscopic Complex Segmentectomy: Propensity Matching Analysis.

PURPOSE

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) complex segmentectomy has been challenging for thoracic surgeons. This study was designed to compare the perioperative outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomy.

METHODS

Data on a total of 122 uniportal and 57 multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies were assessed. Propensity score (PS) matching yielded 56 patients in each group. A crude comparison and PS matching analyses, incorporating preoperative variables, were conducted to elucidate the short-term outcomes between uniportal and multiportal VATS complex segmentectomies.

RESULTS

The uniportal group had a significantly shorter operation time (173 min vs. 195 min, p = 0.004), pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.5 d, p <0.001), and postoperative hospital stay (4.2 d vs. 5.3 d, p <0.001) before matching, and a significant difference was also observed after matching for pleural drainage duration (2.5 d vs. 3.6 d, p <0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (4.5 d vs. 5.2 d, p = 0.001). The numbers of dissected lymph nodes in N1 and N2 stations, the intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy was not inferior to multiportal VATS in terms of perioperative outcomes and therefore should be considered as a viable surgical approach for treatment.