Ma Tianyi, Mao Yan, Wang Haibo
Department of Breast Disease Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Nov 19;12:11857-11869. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S276996. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of systemic combined with local therapies in isolated metachronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (mISLM) breast cancer patients.
We reviewed the data of mISLM patients admitted by Breast Disease Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, from January 2009 to July 2019. Ninety-nine patients were included and were divided into two groups: the systemic group, which referred to patients who received only systemic therapy, and the combined group, which referred to patients who received systemic therapy plus local therapy (including neck radiotherapy (RT) and/or supraclavicular lymph node dissection surgery). In the combined group, patients were further divided into systemic therapy plus: 1) neck RT, 2) supraclavicular lymph node dissection surgery, and 3) neck RT and supraclavicular lymph node dissection surgery.
The median duration of follow-up was 36 months. The median PFS was 15 months, and the median OS was 35 months. Local control rates of 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were 92.9%, 86.9% and 84.8%, respectively. The combined group (n=56) had a significantly better PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.001) than the systemic group (n=43). Compared with Group B (n=13) and Group C (n=14), Group A (n=29) had a significantly better PFS (P=0.007). Higher dose and conventional dose showed no significant differences regarding the local control rate (P=1.000), PFS (P=0.787) or OS (P=0.690) in the patients who received RT. In multivariate analysis, pN3 stage and combined therapy (systemic therapy plus local therapy) for mISLM affected PFS (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). Neck RT was an independent parameter affecting OS (P=0.002).
In breast cancer patients with mISLM, systemic therapy combined with local therapy could improve PFS and OS. Based on systemic therapy, RT had a better effect on survival than surgery. However, more aggressive methods, such as systemic therapy combined with both RT and surgery or a higher dose of RT, may not be associated with improved PFS or OS in these patients.
本研究旨在评估全身联合局部治疗在孤立性异时性同侧锁骨上淋巴结转移(mISLM)乳腺癌患者中的疗效。
我们回顾了2009年1月至2019年7月青岛大学附属医院乳腺疾病中心收治的mISLM患者的数据。纳入99例患者,分为两组:全身治疗组,指仅接受全身治疗的患者;联合治疗组,指接受全身治疗加局部治疗(包括颈部放疗(RT)和/或锁骨上淋巴结清扫术)的患者。在联合治疗组中,患者进一步分为全身治疗加:1)颈部RT,2)锁骨上淋巴结清扫术,3)颈部RT和锁骨上淋巴结清扫术。
中位随访时间为36个月。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为15个月,中位总生存期(OS)为35个月。1年、2年和3年的局部控制率分别为92.9%、86.9%和84.8%。联合治疗组(n = 56)的PFS(P < 0.001)和OS(P = 0.001)显著优于全身治疗组(n = 43)。与B组(n = 13)和C组(n = 14)相比,A组(n = 29)的PFS显著更好(P = 0.007)。在接受放疗的患者中,高剂量和常规剂量在局部控制率(P = 1.000)、PFS(P = 0.787)或OS(P = 0.690)方面无显著差异。多因素分析显示,mISLM的pN3期和联合治疗(全身治疗加局部治疗)影响PFS(分别为P < 0.001和P = 0.002)。颈部RT是影响OS的独立参数(P = 0.002)。
在mISLM乳腺癌患者中,全身治疗联合局部治疗可改善PFS和OS。在全身治疗的基础上,放疗对生存的影响优于手术。然而,更积极的方法,如全身治疗联合放疗和手术或更高剂量的放疗,可能与这些患者的PFS或OS改善无关。