Zhang W, Qi X M, Chen A X, Zhang P, Cao X C, Xiao C H
The first department of breast cancer Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research center of cancer, Key library of cancer prevention and therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key library of cancer prevention and therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300060, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017 May 23;39(5):374-379. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.05.011.
In this study, we evaluated the effect of supraclavicular lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients who presented with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (ISLM) without distant metastasis. A total of 90 patients with synchronous ISLM without distant metastasis between 2000 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups, namely supraclavicular lymph node dissection group(34 patients) and non-dissection group(56 patients), according to whether they underwentsupraclavicular lymph node dissection or not.The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to analyze the locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS) and overall survival(OS). Median follow-upwas 85 months(range, 6 to 11 months). Local recurrence in 32 cases, 47 cases of distant metastasis, of which 25 patients were accompanied by both locoregional relapse and distant metastasis. Of the 32 patients with locoregional relapse, 11 patients were in the lymph node dissection group and 21 patients in the control group. Of the 47 patients with distant metastases, 17 were treated with lymph node dissection, 30 in the control group. Thirty-two patients died in the whole group and 16 patients underwentlymph node dissection and 16 patients didn't. There was no significant difference between the rate of 5-year LRFS and 5-year OS (=0.359, =0.246). For patients of ER negative, the 5-year loco-regional relapse free survival rates were 63.7% and 43.3% in supraclavicular lymph node dissection group and control group, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 52.1% and 52.3%, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences (=0.118, =0.951). For patients of PR negative, the 5-yearloco-regional relapse free rates were 59.8% and 46.2%, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 50.6% and 43.2%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (=0.317, =0.973). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients were 61.2% and 48.0%(=0.634), respectively, and the 5-year overall survival rates were 37.2% and 65.4%(=0.032). Forty-seven patients suffered distant metastases and the 5-year metastases free survival rates were 37.3% and 38.5% in supraclavicular lymph node dissection group and control group, respectively. Supraclavicular lymph node dissection maybe an effective approach to improve the loco-regional control for the patients with ISLM, especially for ER negative and PR negative subtypes, but it might has adverseeffects for the patients with negative HER2 status.
在本研究中,我们评估了锁骨上淋巴结清扫术对出现同侧锁骨上淋巴结转移(ISLM)且无远处转移的乳腺癌患者的疗效。回顾性分析了2000年至2009年间共90例同步发生ISLM且无远处转移的患者。根据是否接受锁骨上淋巴结清扫术,将患者回顾性分为两组,即锁骨上淋巴结清扫组(34例)和非清扫组(56例)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析局部区域无复发生存率(LRFS)和总生存率(OS)。中位随访时间为85个月(范围6至11个月)。局部复发32例,远处转移47例,其中25例患者同时伴有局部区域复发和远处转移。在32例局部复发患者中,淋巴结清扫组有11例,对照组有21例。在47例远处转移患者中,淋巴结清扫组有17例,对照组有30例。全组32例患者死亡,淋巴结清扫组16例,未清扫组16例。5年LRFS率和5年OS率之间无显著差异(P = 0.359,P = 0.246)。对于雌激素受体(ER)阴性患者,锁骨上淋巴结清扫组和对照组的5年局部区域无复发生存率分别为63.7%和43.3%。5年总生存率分别为52.1%和52.3%,无统计学显著差异(P = 0.118,P = 0.951)。对于孕激素受体(PR)阴性患者,5年局部区域无复发率分别为59.8%和46.2%,5年总生存率分别为50.6%和43.2%,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.317,P = 0.973)。人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性患者的5年无复发生存率分别为61.2%和48.0%(P = 0.634),5年总生存率分别为37.2%和65.4%(P = 0.032)。47例患者发生远处转移,锁骨上淋巴结清扫组和对照组的5年无转移生存率分别为37.3%和38.5%。锁骨上淋巴结清扫术可能是改善ISLM患者局部区域控制的有效方法,特别是对于ER阴性和PR阴性亚型,但对于HER2阴性患者可能有不良影响。