Kumar Santosh, Kodidela Sunitha, Kumar Asit, Gerth Kelli, Zhi Kaining
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
The Plough Center of Drug Delivery Solutions, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 9;11:574712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574712. eCollection 2020.
The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected individuals of all categories, irrespective of their geographical locations, professions, gender, or race. As a result of full or partial lock-down and stay-at-home orders, the well-being and productivity of individuals were severely affected. Since basic science research requires laboratory experiments, the work-from-home strategy hurt their productivity. In addition, the combination of decreased productivity and staying at home is likely to compromise their well-being by causing stress and anxiety. In this case study, a strategy was developed to engage researchers through listening and learning, motivation, and empowerment, using regular virtual sessions. Through these virtual sessions, research work was prioritized and coordinated, from idea conception to writing research papers and grant proposals. Perceived stress scores (PSS) and COVID-19-related stress (COVID-SS) scores were measured to evaluate general and COVID-19-induced stress, respectively, every month from March to July 2020 during the COVID-19 era. The result showed a significant improvement in both the PSS and the COVID-SS scores of the intervention group compared to the control group. In addition, while there was no/minimal change in PSS and COVID-SS scores from March to subsequent months until July for the control group, the intervention groups showed significant and consistent improvement in both scores in the intervention group. Overall, the intervention strategy showed improved well-being for basic science researchers, which was also consistent with their improved productivity during the COVID-19 era.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行影响了所有类别的个人,无论其地理位置、职业、性别或种族如何。由于全面或部分封锁以及居家令,个人的幸福感和生产力受到了严重影响。由于基础科学研究需要进行实验室实验,居家办公策略损害了他们的生产力。此外,生产力下降和居家的双重因素可能会因导致压力和焦虑而损害他们的幸福感。在本案例研究中,制定了一项策略,通过定期的虚拟会议,通过倾听、学习、激励和赋能来让研究人员参与其中。通过这些虚拟会议,从构思想法到撰写研究论文和资助提案,研究工作都被进行了优先排序和协调。在2020年3月至7月的COVID-19疫情期间,每月测量感知压力评分(PSS)和与COVID-19相关的压力评分(COVID-SS),分别用于评估一般压力和COVID-19引发的压力。结果显示,与对照组相比,干预组的PSS和COVID-SS评分均有显著改善。此外,对照组从3月到7月的后续月份中,PSS和COVID-SS评分没有/仅有极小变化,而干预组的这两项评分均有显著且持续的改善。总体而言,该干预策略显示基础科学研究人员的幸福感得到了提升,这也与他们在COVID-19疫情期间提高的生产力相一致。