Suppr超能文献

在非词重复任务中,不同音素会产生情境干扰效应。

Dissimilar Phonemes Create a Contextual Interference Effect During a Nonword Repetition Task.

作者信息

Meigh Kimberly M, Kee Elisabeth

机构信息

Speech Motor Control Lab, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:585745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585745. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

: The contextual interference effect is a motor learning phenomenon where conditions that decrease overall learning during practice enhance overall learning with new tasks. In the limb literature, this effect is observed when different practice conditions are used (e.g., blocked vs. random practice schedules). In speech motor learning, contextual interference effects are mixed. The differences observed during speech motor learning may be due to the stimuli used. We hypothesized that dissimilar phonemes might create interference during speech motor learning, such that training accuracy would decrease. However, generalization accuracy would increase compared to practice with nonwords containing similar phonemes. : Thirty young adults with typical speech and hearing participated in a motor learning study using a cross-over design. Participants engaged in nonword repetition training followed by an immediate retention and transfer task with two sets of nonwords: nonwords with similar phonemes and nonwords with dissimilar phonemes. Percent consonants correct were calculated to examine the effects of the two different types of nonwords based on the stage of skill acquisition. : A contextual interference effect was observed in this study using nonwords that varied in phonemic similarity. Nonwords with similar phonemes were produced with greater accuracy during the training stage of skill acquisition, and nonwords with dissimilar phonemes were produced with greater accuracy during the transfer stage. : The proposed hypothesis for this study was met - practicing nonwords with dissimilar phonemes resulted in greater accuracy in the transfer phase of this experiment. Results indicate that phonemic dissimilarity produced contextual interference and influenced speech motor learning. These results indicate that the linguistic properties of stimuli must be factored into speech motor learning. Future research should explore if other linguistic variables interact with variables of motor learning to enhance speech practice and generalization outcomes.

摘要

情境干扰效应是一种运动学习现象,即在练习过程中降低整体学习效果的条件会增强新任务的整体学习效果。在肢体运动文献中,当使用不同的练习条件(例如,集中练习与随机练习计划)时会观察到这种效应。在言语运动学习中,情境干扰效应存在差异。言语运动学习过程中观察到的差异可能归因于所使用的刺激。我们假设不同的音素可能在言语运动学习过程中产生干扰,从而导致训练准确性下降。然而,与使用包含相似音素的非单词进行练习相比,泛化准确性会提高。

30名具有典型言语和听力的年轻成年人参与了一项采用交叉设计的运动学习研究。参与者进行非单词重复训练,随后立即进行两组非单词的保持和迁移任务:包含相似音素的非单词和包含不同音素的非单词。根据技能习得阶段计算正确辅音百分比,以检验两种不同类型非单词的效果。

在本研究中,使用音素相似性不同的非单词观察到了情境干扰效应。在技能习得的训练阶段,包含相似音素的非单词发音准确性更高,而在迁移阶段,包含不同音素的非单词发音准确性更高。

本研究提出的假设得到了验证——练习包含不同音素的非单词在本实验的迁移阶段产生了更高的准确性。结果表明,音素差异产生了情境干扰并影响了言语运动学习。这些结果表明,刺激的语言属性必须纳入言语运动学习的考虑因素。未来的研究应探索其他语言变量是否与运动学习变量相互作用,以提高言语练习和泛化效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f4a/7683406/152d749d6fb2/fpsyg-11-585745-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dissimilar Phonemes Create a Contextual Interference Effect During a Nonword Repetition Task.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:585745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585745. eCollection 2020.
2
Phoneme and Stress Programming Interact During Nonword Repetition Learning.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2219-2228. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00262. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences.
J Fluency Disord. 2015 Jun;44:17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
4
A comparison of the performance of Persian speaking children who do and do not stutter on three nonwords repetition tasks.
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105825. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105825. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Nonword repetition in children and adults: effects on movement coordination.
Dev Sci. 2010 May;13(3):521-532. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00911.x.
6
The Impact of Feedback Frequency on Performance in a Novel Speech Motor Learning Task.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1712-1725. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0207.
7
Practice and retention of nonwords in adults who stutter.
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Sep;41:55-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Neural Mechanisms of the Contextual Interference Effect and Parameter Similarity on Motor Learning in Older Adults: An EEG Study.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Jun 12;12:173. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00173. eCollection 2020.
9
When you hear /baksɛt/ do you think /baskɛt/? Evidence for transposed-phoneme effect with multisyllabic words.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jan;48(1):98-107. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000978. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Perceptual Learning and Production Practice Differentially Affect How Children Produce Novel Words.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Oct 16;63(10):3432-3442. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00077. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Speech motor planning in the context of phonetically similar words: Evidence from apraxia of speech and aphasia.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Apr;127:171-184. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
2
Contextual interference enhances motor learning through increased resting brain connectivity during memory consolidation.
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.081. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
3
A Novel Investigation of Generalized Motor Program Theory: Syllable Stress as a Motor-Class Variable.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jun 22;60(6S):1685-1694. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0247.
4
Anticipatory coarticulation and the minimal planning unit of speech.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):139-153. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000443. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Effects of practice schedules on speech motor learning.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Oct;15(5):511-23. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2012.761282. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
8
Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: a focused review and perspective.
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Mar 1;228(1):219-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word production: an fMRI study.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;23(3):593-603. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21489. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
10
Nonnative speech perception training using vowel subsets: effects of vowels in sets and order of training.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Dec;51(6):1480-93. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0109). Epub 2008 Jul 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验