Prout Tracy A, Zilcha-Mano Sigal, Aafjes-van Doorn Katie, Békés Vera, Christman-Cohen Isabelle, Whistler Kathryn, Kui Thomas, Di Giuseppe Mariagrazia
School-Clinical Child Psychology Program, Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 5;11:586202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586202. eCollection 2020.
Scientific understanding about the psychological impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic is in its nascent stage. Prior research suggests that demographic factors, such as gender and age, are associated with greater distress during a global health crisis. Less is known about how emotion regulation impacts levels of distress during a pandemic. The present study aimed to identify predictors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants ( = 2,787) provided demographics, history of adverse childhood experiences, current coping strategies (use of implicit and explicit emotion regulation), and current psychological distress. The overall prevalence of clinical levels of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress was higher than the prevalence outside a pandemic and was higher than rates reported among healthcare workers and survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Younger participants (<45 years), women, and non-binary individuals reported higher prevalence of symptoms across all measures of distress. A random forest machine learning algorithm was used to identify the strongest predictors of distress. Regression trees were developed to identify individuals at greater risk for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Somatization and less reliance on adaptive defense mechanisms were associated with greater distress. These findings highlight the importance of assessing individuals' physical experiences of psychological distress and emotion regulation strategies to help mental health providers tailor assessments and treatment during a global health crisis.
关于新冠疫情全球大流行对心理影响的科学认识尚处于初期阶段。先前的研究表明,诸如性别和年龄等人口统计学因素,在全球健康危机期间与更大的痛苦相关。关于情绪调节在大流行期间如何影响痛苦程度,人们了解得较少。本研究旨在确定新冠疫情期间心理痛苦的预测因素。参与者(n = 2787)提供了人口统计学信息、童年不良经历史、当前的应对策略(内隐和外显情绪调节的使用情况)以及当前的心理痛苦状况。焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激临床水平的总体患病率高于大流行之外的患病率,且高于医护人员和严重急性呼吸综合征幸存者报告的患病率。较年轻的参与者(<45岁)、女性和非二元性别人士在所有痛苦测量指标上报告的症状患病率更高。使用随机森林机器学习算法来确定痛苦的最强预测因素。构建回归树以识别焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激风险更高的个体。躯体化和对适应性防御机制的较少依赖与更大痛苦相关。这些发现凸显了评估个体心理痛苦的身体体验和情绪调节策略对于帮助心理健康提供者在全球健康危机期间进行针对性评估和治疗的重要性。