Ackerman V P, Pritchard R C
Department of Microbiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney.
Pathology. 1987 Jul;19(3):265-73. doi: 10.3109/00313028709066561.
The blood-culture methods of participants in the Microbiology Quality Assurance Programme were surveyed in late 1983; 183 participants from Australasia and S.E. Asia completed a questionnaire, the results of which are discussed. The choice of skin disinfectants varied widely. Conventional broth media were used by 85 participants; one or more diphasic bottles by 56; Roche Septi-Chek was used by 25; and BACTEC by 17. Only 80% of respondents reported the use of sodium polyanethol sulfonate. Contamination rates ranged from 0 to greater than 10%. Cultures were kept for as little as five days or as long as three weeks and were examined by inspection and/or Gram stain and/or subculture at widely varying intervals. While a great diversity of methods was used, in most cases these were adequate. The workload involved in some of the more laborious routines was considerable. It would be desirable to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of many blood culture practices.
1983年末对微生物质量保证计划参与者的血培养方法进行了调查;来自澳大拉西亚和东南亚的183名参与者填写了一份调查问卷,本文讨论了调查结果。皮肤消毒剂的选择差异很大。85名参与者使用传统肉汤培养基;56名使用一种或多种双相瓶;25名使用罗氏Septi-Chek;17名使用BACTEC。只有80%的受访者报告使用了聚茴香脑磺酸钠。污染率从0到超过10%不等。培养物保存时间短至五天或长达三周,并在广泛不同的间隔时间通过检查和/或革兰氏染色和/或传代培养进行检查。虽然使用了多种多样的方法,但在大多数情况下这些方法是足够的。一些较为繁琐的常规操作所涉及的工作量相当大。评估许多血培养操作的成本效益是可取的。