Suppr超能文献

BACTEC与Septi-Chek联合血液培养系统的阳性率、临床意义及成本

Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.

作者信息

Thomson R B, File T M, Tan J S, Evans B L

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):819-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987.

Abstract

A blood culture was performed by adding a vented Septi-Chek bottle (Roche Diagnostics, Div. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, N.J.) to a standard BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.) blood culture. The yield of bacteremic patients, the clinical significance of organisms detected, and the cost of the combination system were compared with those of the standard BACTEC system alone. Each culture included 20 ml of blood divided among a BACTEC 6B aerobic bottle (5 ml), a BACTEC 7D anaerobic bottle (5 ml), and a Septi-Chek bottle equipped with a slide subculture attachment (10 ml). Significant isolates grew in 9.6% of the 2,269 cultures evaluated. The combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek system detected 25% more bacteremic patients than the BACTEC system alone, 129 patients versus 103. The 26 bacteremic patients detected by only the added Septi-Chek bottle included 7 whose organism was isolated from blood alone and 19 whose organism was in mixed or pure culture from a second source. Detection of the organism resulted in alteration of antimicrobial therapy in 17 of these 26 patients. The combination system, which cultured a 20-ml blood volume, cost $11,000 more during the study period than the BACTEC system alone, which cultured a 10-ml volume. Reimbursement under the diagnosis-related group system was increased by $23,000 as a result of documentation of sepsis in these 26 patients. Blood volume and, possibly, the use of multiple blood culture systems are important factors when selecting a blood culture procedure for routine use.

摘要

通过在标准BACTEC系统(约翰斯顿实验室公司,马里兰州陶森市)血培养中添加一个带通气孔的Septi-Chek瓶(罗氏诊断公司,霍夫曼-拉罗什公司分部,新泽西州纳特利)进行血培养。将菌血症患者的培养阳性率、检测到的微生物的临床意义以及联合系统的成本与单独使用标准BACTEC系统的情况进行比较。每次培养包括20毫升血液,分别注入一个BACTEC 6B需氧瓶(5毫升)、一个BACTEC 7D厌氧瓶(5毫升)和一个配备玻片传代培养附件的Septi-Chek瓶(10毫升)。在评估的2269次培养中,9.6%培养出了有意义的分离菌。BACTEC加Septi-Chek联合系统检测出的菌血症患者比单独使用BACTEC系统多25%,分别为129例和103例。仅通过添加的Septi-Chek瓶检测出的26例菌血症患者中,有7例其微生物仅从血液中分离得到,19例其微生物来自第二个来源的混合或纯培养。在这26例患者中,有17例因检测到该微生物而改变了抗菌治疗方案。联合系统培养20毫升血样,在研究期间比单独培养10毫升血样的BACTEC系统成本高出11,000美元。由于记录了这26例患者的败血症情况,诊断相关组系统下的报销增加了23,000美元。在选择常规使用的血培养程序时,血样量以及可能的多种血培养系统的使用是重要因素。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验