• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.BACTEC与Septi-Chek联合血液培养系统的阳性率、临床意义及成本
J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):819-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987.
2
Comparative evaluation of BACTEC aerobic Plus/F and Septi-Chek Release blood culture media.BACTEC需氧Plus/F培养基与Septi-Chek Release血培养培养基的比较评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jan;34(1):126-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.1.126-129.1996.
3
Controlled evaluation of BACTEC Plus 26 and Roche Septi-Chek aerobic blood culture bottles.BACTEC Plus 26和罗氏Septi-Chek需氧血培养瓶的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 May;29(5):879-82. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.5.879-882.1991.
4
Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.琼脂平板和放射性血液培养系统检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986.
5
Controlled comparison of a new Becton Dickinson agar slant blood culture system with Roche Septi-Chek for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.一种新的贝克顿·迪金森琼脂斜面血培养系统与罗氏Septi-Chek在检测菌血症和真菌血症方面的对照比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Dec;27(12):2637-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.12.2637-2639.1989.
6
Failure of Campylobacter pylori to grow in commercial blood culture systems.幽门螺杆菌在商业血培养系统中生长失败。
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May;26(5):1029-30. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.1029-1030.1988.
7
Comparison of the Septi-Chek AFB and BACTEC systems and conventional culture for recovery of mycobacteria.用于分枝杆菌培养的Septi-Chek AFB系统、BACTEC系统与传统培养方法的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Oct;31(10):2689-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.10.2689-2691.1993.
8
Detection of pathogenic Campylobacter species in blood culture systems.血液培养系统中致病性弯曲杆菌属的检测
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Apr;23(4):709-14. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.4.709-714.1986.
9
Comparison of the Bactec Peds Plus pediatric blood culture vial with Roche pediatric Septi-Chek for blood cultures from pediatric patients.Bactec Peds Plus儿科血培养瓶与罗氏儿科Septi-Chek用于儿科患者血培养的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 May;30(5):1361-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1361-1362.1992.
10
Comparison of automated Difco ESP blood culture system with biphasic BBL Septi-Chek system for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients.自动迪夫科ESP血培养系统与双相型BBL血培养瓶系统在儿科患者血流感染检测中的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1084-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1084-1088.1995.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学质量控制的不断发展的管理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.1.55.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.血培养体积在菌血症和真菌血症检测中的重要性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Jun;1(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90039-1.
2
Large-scale clinical comparison of the lysis-centrifugation and radiometric systems for blood culture.血液培养中裂解离心系统与放射测量系统的大规模临床比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):951-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.951-954.1985.
3
Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system.BACTEC血培养系统中的标本量与培养阳性率
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Aug;22(2):292-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.292-295.1985.
4
Controlled evaluation of the agar-slide and radiometric blood culture systems for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.琼脂平板和放射性血液培养系统检测菌血症和真菌血症的对照评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):221-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.221-225.1986.

BACTEC与Septi-Chek联合血液培养系统的阳性率、临床意义及成本

Yield, clinical significance, and cost of a combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek blood culture system.

作者信息

Thomson R B, File T M, Tan J S, Evans B L

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 May;25(5):819-23. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.25.5.819-823.1987
PMID:3294885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC266095/
Abstract

A blood culture was performed by adding a vented Septi-Chek bottle (Roche Diagnostics, Div. Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, N.J.) to a standard BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.) blood culture. The yield of bacteremic patients, the clinical significance of organisms detected, and the cost of the combination system were compared with those of the standard BACTEC system alone. Each culture included 20 ml of blood divided among a BACTEC 6B aerobic bottle (5 ml), a BACTEC 7D anaerobic bottle (5 ml), and a Septi-Chek bottle equipped with a slide subculture attachment (10 ml). Significant isolates grew in 9.6% of the 2,269 cultures evaluated. The combination BACTEC plus Septi-Chek system detected 25% more bacteremic patients than the BACTEC system alone, 129 patients versus 103. The 26 bacteremic patients detected by only the added Septi-Chek bottle included 7 whose organism was isolated from blood alone and 19 whose organism was in mixed or pure culture from a second source. Detection of the organism resulted in alteration of antimicrobial therapy in 17 of these 26 patients. The combination system, which cultured a 20-ml blood volume, cost $11,000 more during the study period than the BACTEC system alone, which cultured a 10-ml volume. Reimbursement under the diagnosis-related group system was increased by $23,000 as a result of documentation of sepsis in these 26 patients. Blood volume and, possibly, the use of multiple blood culture systems are important factors when selecting a blood culture procedure for routine use.

摘要

通过在标准BACTEC系统(约翰斯顿实验室公司,马里兰州陶森市)血培养中添加一个带通气孔的Septi-Chek瓶(罗氏诊断公司,霍夫曼-拉罗什公司分部,新泽西州纳特利)进行血培养。将菌血症患者的培养阳性率、检测到的微生物的临床意义以及联合系统的成本与单独使用标准BACTEC系统的情况进行比较。每次培养包括20毫升血液,分别注入一个BACTEC 6B需氧瓶(5毫升)、一个BACTEC 7D厌氧瓶(5毫升)和一个配备玻片传代培养附件的Septi-Chek瓶(10毫升)。在评估的2269次培养中,9.6%培养出了有意义的分离菌。BACTEC加Septi-Chek联合系统检测出的菌血症患者比单独使用BACTEC系统多25%,分别为129例和103例。仅通过添加的Septi-Chek瓶检测出的26例菌血症患者中,有7例其微生物仅从血液中分离得到,19例其微生物来自第二个来源的混合或纯培养。在这26例患者中,有17例因检测到该微生物而改变了抗菌治疗方案。联合系统培养20毫升血样,在研究期间比单独培养10毫升血样的BACTEC系统成本高出11,000美元。由于记录了这26例患者的败血症情况,诊断相关组系统下的报销增加了23,000美元。在选择常规使用的血培养程序时,血样量以及可能的多种血培养系统的使用是重要因素。