• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统超声检查寻找隐匿性伤口:腹部超声辅助检查在穿透性创伤中的准确性

Systematic Sonography Looking for Occult Wounds: accuracy of an abdominal ultrasound adjunct in penetrating trauma.

作者信息

Jagjit Sri Devi, Rupp Jordan, Ferre Robinson M, Jordan Mary Kate, Bales Brian

机构信息

Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation, New Market St., Georgetown, Guyana.

Vanderbilt Medical Center, 1313 21st Avenue South, Oxford House 703, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2020 Nov 26;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00194-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13089-020-00194-3
PMID:33242102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic Sonography Looking for Occult Wounds (SSLOW) in trauma is a novel technique for the evaluation of intra-abdominal wounds in penetrating trauma. No data exist regarding the effectiveness. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the SSLOW exam.

METHODS

This is a prospective collected case series conducted over a period of 10 months and took place at the Accident and Emergency Department (A&E) of the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC). The study enrolled patients presenting to the A&E who were 16 years old or greater with penetrating abdominal trauma. All patients with penetrating trauma received an E-FAST examination. If the E-FAST examination was negative, a SSLOW examination was completed. The sonographer evaluated for free fluid collection between the loops of bowel. The results of the SSLOW were compared to usual care (surgery consult, serial abdominal and E-FAST exams, laparotomy, and 7-day follow-up) and then categorized into four groups: true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative. These results lead to four categorical values. From these results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 5 (12%) true positives, 1 (2%) false positive, 37 (86%) true negatives, and zero (0%) false negative. The SSLOW was 100% sensitive (95% CI 5-100%) and 97% specificity (95% CI 74-96%). There was an 80% positive predictive value (95% CI 1.0-64% 95% CI) and 100% negative predictive value (95% CI 88-100%). The positive likelihood ratio was 8.4 (95% CI 3.69-19.1) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.

CONCLUSION

The SSLOW examination may be a useful tool in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal injuries.

摘要

背景

创伤中系统超声检查寻找隐匿性伤口(SSLOW)是一种用于评估穿透性创伤中腹部伤口的新技术。目前尚无关于其有效性的数据。本研究的目的是评估SSLOW检查的准确性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性收集的病例系列研究,为期10个月,在乔治敦公立医院集团(GPHC)急诊科进行。该研究纳入了年龄在16岁及以上、因穿透性腹部创伤就诊于急诊科的患者。所有穿透性创伤患者均接受了扩展创伤重点超声评估(E-FAST)检查。如果E-FAST检查结果为阴性,则完成SSLOW检查。超声检查人员评估肠袢之间是否有游离液体聚集。将SSLOW的结果与常规护理(手术会诊、系列腹部检查和E-FAST检查、剖腹手术以及7天随访)进行比较,然后分为四组:真阳性、假阳性、真阴性和假阴性。这些结果产生四个分类值。根据这些结果,计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和似然比。

结果

有5例(12%)真阳性、1例(2%)假阳性、37例(86%)真阴性和0例(0%)假阴性。SSLOW的敏感性为100%(95%可信区间5%-100%),特异性为97%(95%可信区间74%-96%)。阳性预测值为80%(95%可信区间1.0%-64% 95%可信区间),阴性预测值为100%(95%可信区间88%-100%)。阳性似然比为8.4(95%可信区间3.69-19.1),阴性似然比为0。

结论

SSLOW检查可能是评估穿透性腹部损伤的一种有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aca/7691400/95eb29c4d3a7/13089_2020_194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aca/7691400/95eb29c4d3a7/13089_2020_194_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aca/7691400/95eb29c4d3a7/13089_2020_194_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Sonography Looking for Occult Wounds: accuracy of an abdominal ultrasound adjunct in penetrating trauma.系统超声检查寻找隐匿性伤口:腹部超声辅助检查在穿透性创伤中的准确性
Ultrasound J. 2020 Nov 26;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00194-3.
2
Role of ultrasonography in penetrating abdominal trauma: a prospective clinical study.超声检查在穿透性腹部创伤中的作用:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Trauma. 2001 Mar;50(3):475-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200103000-00011.
3
FAST scan: is it worth doing in hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients?快速扫描:在血流动力学稳定的钝性创伤患者中是否值得进行?
Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):695-700; discussion 700-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.032. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Not so FAST.没那么快。
J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):52-9; discussion 59-60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200301000-00007.
5
Digital hand-held sonography utilised for the focused assessment with sonography for trauma: a pilot study.用于创伤超声重点评估的数字手持式超声检查:一项初步研究。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2001 Nov;30(6):577-81.
6
Test characteristics of focused assessment of sonography for trauma for clinically significant abdominal free fluid in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.超声检查在小儿腹部钝性创伤中对临床显著腹部游离液体的作用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 May;18(5):477-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01071.x.
7
False-negative FAST examination: associations with injury characteristics and patient outcomes.假阴性 FAST 检查:与损伤特征和患者结局的关联。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;60(3):326-34.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.01.023. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
8
Sonographic examination of abdominal trauma by senior surgical residents.高级外科住院医师对腹部创伤的超声检查。
Am Surg. 1997 Aug;63(8):669-74.
9
Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in blunt paediatric abdominal trauma.小儿钝性腹部创伤的聚焦腹部创伤超声检查(FAST)
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Mar;63(3):361-4.
10
What is the utility of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam in penetrating torso trauma?经胸穿透性创伤中 Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma(FAST)检查的应用价值是什么?
Injury. 2011 May;42(5):482-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.249.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Care Ultrasound in Shock: A Comprehensive Review of Ultrasound Protocol for Hemodynamic Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit.休克中的重症监护超声:重症监护病房血流动力学评估超声方案的全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5344. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185344.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Ultrasound Training Program in Guyana: Systematic Credentialing Process in a Resource-limited Setting.圭亚那的急诊超声培训项目:资源有限环境下的系统认证过程
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 21;3(2):197-199. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10313. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Injuries in Stable Patients With Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描诊断稳定型前腹部刺伤患者腹腔内损伤的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;25(7):744-757. doi: 10.1111/acem.13380. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the Extended Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (E-FAST) performed by emergency physicians compared to CT.
急诊医师实施的扩展焦点腹部超声检查(E-FAST)与 CT 相比的诊断准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):1014-1017. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Systematic Sonography for Detection of Occult Wounds in Trauma.用于检测创伤中隐匿性伤口的系统超声检查
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Jun;37(6):1539-1542. doi: 10.1002/jum.14476. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of secondary ultrasound exam in blunt abdominal trauma.腹部钝性创伤中二次超声检查的诊断准确性
Iran J Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(3):e21010. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21010. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
6
Prehospital ultrasound imaging improves management of abdominal trauma.院前超声成像改善腹部创伤的管理。
Br J Surg. 2006 Feb;93(2):238-42. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5213.
7
Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: an analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience.相对较短的诊断延迟(<8小时)会导致钝性小肠损伤的发病和死亡:对来自多中心的198例患者手术干预时间的分析。
J Trauma. 2000 Mar;48(3):408-14; discussion 414-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200003000-00007.
8
1,000 consecutive ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma.1000例连续钝性腹部创伤的超声检查
J Trauma. 1996 Apr;40(4):607-10; discussion 611-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199604000-00015.
9
Prospective evaluation of surgeons' use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients.外科医生在创伤患者评估中使用超声的前瞻性评估。
J Trauma. 1993 Apr;34(4):516-26; discussion 526-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199304000-00008.
10
Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film.气腹的诊断:腹部CT与立位胸片对比
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 Sep-Oct;16(5):713-6.