• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描诊断稳定型前腹部刺伤患者腹腔内损伤的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Injuries in Stable Patients With Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;25(7):744-757. doi: 10.1111/acem.13380. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1111/acem.13380
PMID:29369452
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Workup for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) following an anterior abdominal stab wound (AASW) has been debated since the 1960s. Experts agree that patients with peritonitis, evisceration, or hemodynamic instability should undergo immediate laparotomy (LAP); however, workup of stable, asymptomatic or nonperitoneal patients is not clearly defined.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography of abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) for diagnosis of intraabdominal injuries requiring therapeutic laparotomy (THER-LAP) in ED patients with AASW. Is a negative CT scan without a period of observation sufficient to safely discharge a hemodynamically stable, asymptomatic AASW patient?

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from their inception until May 2017 for studies on ED patients with AASW. We defined the reference standard test as LAP for patients who were managed surgically and inpatient observation in those who were managed nonoperatively. In those who underwent LAP, THER-LAP was considered as disease positive. We used the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) to evaluate the risk of bias and assess the applicability of the included studies. We attempted to compute the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) using a random-effects model with MetaDiSc software and calculate testing and treatment thresholds for CT scan applying the Pauker and Kassirer model.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included encompassing 575 patients. The weighted prevalence of THER-LAP was 34.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.5%-38.2%). Studies had variable quality and the inclusion criteria were not uniform. The operating characteristics of CT scan were as follows: sensitivity = 50% to 100%, specificity = 39% to 97%, LR+ = 1.0 to 15.7, and LR- = 0.07 to 1.0. The high heterogeneity (I  > 75%) of the operating characteristics of CT scan prevented pooling of the data and therefore the testing and treatment thresholds could not be estimated.

DISCUSSION

The articles revealed a high prevalence (8.7%, 95% CI = 6.1%-12.2%) of injuries requiring THER-LAP in patients with a negative CT scan and almost half (47%, 95% CI = 30%-64%) of those injuries involved the small bowel.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable AASW patients, a negative CT scan alone without an observation period is inadequate to exclude significant intraabdominal injuries.

摘要

背景

自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,对于接受腹部前侧刺伤(AASW)的急诊科(ED)患者的检查一直存在争议。专家一致认为,对于腹膜炎、内脏脱出或血流动力学不稳定的患者,应立即进行剖腹手术(LAP);然而,对于稳定、无症状或非腹膜患者的检查尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估腹部和骨盆计算机断层扫描(CTAP)在诊断 ED 中接受 AASW 的患者需要治疗性剖腹手术(THER-LAP)的腹部内损伤的准确性。阴性 CT 扫描且不进行观察是否足以安全地排出血流动力学稳定、无症状的 AASW 患者?

方法

我们检索了从成立开始到 2017 年 5 月的 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库,以获取有关接受 AASW 的 ED 患者的研究。我们将参考标准测试定义为对接受手术治疗的患者进行剖腹手术,对接受非手术治疗的患者进行住院观察。在接受 LAP 的患者中,将需要 THER-LAP 的患者视为疾病阳性。我们使用诊断准确性研究的质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)来评估偏倚风险并评估纳入研究的适用性。我们使用 MetaDiSc 软件尝试使用随机效应模型计算合并的敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(LR+)和阴性似然比(LR-),并应用 Pauker 和 Kassirer 模型计算 CT 扫描的检测和治疗阈值。

结果

纳入了 7 项研究,共 575 名患者。THER-LAP 的加权患病率为 34.3%(95%置信区间 [CI] = 30.5%-38.2%)。研究的质量存在差异,纳入标准不统一。CT 扫描的操作特征如下:敏感性为 50%至 100%,特异性为 39%至 97%,LR+为 1.0 至 15.7,LR-为 0.07 至 1.0。CT 扫描的操作特征存在高度异质性(I>75%),无法对数据进行汇总,因此无法估计检测和治疗阈值。

讨论

文章显示,阴性 CT 扫描的患者中需要 THER-LAP 的损伤发生率很高(8.7%,95%CI=6.1%-12.2%),而这些损伤中近一半(47%,95%CI=30%-64%)涉及小肠。

结论

对于稳定的 AASW 患者,阴性 CT 扫描单独且不进行观察期不能排除明显的腹腔内损伤。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Injuries in Stable Patients With Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.计算机断层扫描诊断稳定型前腹部刺伤患者腹腔内损伤的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;25(7):744-757. doi: 10.1111/acem.13380. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Validating the Western Trauma Association algorithm for managing patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.验证西部创伤协会管理腹部前侧刺伤患者的算法:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1494-502. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823ba1de.
3
Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial.前腹部刺伤患者的管理:一项西部创伤协会多中心试验
J Trauma. 2009 May;66(5):1294-301. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819dc688.
4
Evaluation of diagnostic laparoscopy for penetrating abdominal injuries: About 131 anterior abdominal stab wound.诊断性腹腔镜检查在穿透性腹部损伤中的应用评估:关于131例前腹壁刺伤。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):2801-2808. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08566-z. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
Prospective evaluation of the role of computed tomography in the assessment of abdominal stab wounds.前瞻性评估计算机断层扫描在评估腹部刺伤中的作用。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):810-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2521.
6
What is the diagnostic value of computed tomography tractography in patients with abdominal stab wounds?计算机断层扫描纤维束成像在腹部刺伤患者中的诊断价值是什么?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Apr;43(2):273-277. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0625-6. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Laboratory Tests, and Point-of-care Ultrasound for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科小儿急性阑尾炎病史、体格检查、实验室检查及床旁超声的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):523-551. doi: 10.1111/acem.13181.
8
Abdominal stab wounds: diagnostic peritoneal lavage criteria for emergency room discharge.腹部刺伤:急诊室出院的诊断性腹腔灌洗标准
J Trauma. 2001 Nov;51(5):939-43. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200111000-00019.
9
Use of computed tomography in anterior abdominal stab wounds: results of a prospective study.计算机断层扫描在前腹部刺伤中的应用:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;141(8):745-50; discussion 750-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.8.745.
10
Efficacy of computed tomography for abdominal stab wounds: a single institutional analysis.计算机断层扫描在腹部刺伤中的应用效果:单机构分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):69-74. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0422-7. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical decision making for abdominal stab wounds in high resourced but low volume centres require structured guidelines to be effective.在资源丰富但病例量少的中心,针对腹部刺伤的临床决策需要有效的结构化指南。
Surg Pract Sci. 2022 May 2;10:100087. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100087. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Intestinal Injury After Suprapubic Catheterisation: A Scoping Review.耻骨上膀胱造瘘术后的肠道损伤:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74057. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74057. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Firearm injury to the left buttock with uterus penetrating trauma.
左臀部火器伤伴子宫穿透伤。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Sep 7;19(12):5639-5647. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.045. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Radiologic Imaging of Traumatic Bowel and Mesenteric Injuries: A Comprehensive Up-to-Date Review.创伤性肠和肠系膜损伤的放射影像学:全面的最新综述。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 May;24(5):406-423. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0998.
5
Systematic Sonography Looking for Occult Wounds: accuracy of an abdominal ultrasound adjunct in penetrating trauma.系统超声检查寻找隐匿性伤口:腹部超声辅助检查在穿透性创伤中的准确性
Ultrasound J. 2020 Nov 26;12(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00194-3.