Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Jianshe East Road, Zhengzhou City, 450052, China.
Eur J Med Res. 2020 Nov 26;25(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00461-y.
In the stabilization of femoral fractures in mono- and polytrauma, clinical practice has shown better care through intramedullary nailing. However, the reason why this is the case is not fully understood. In addition to concomitant injuries, the immunological aspect is increasingly coming to the fore. Neutrophil granulocytes (PMNL), in particular next to other immunological cell types, seem to be associated with the fracture healing processes. For this reason, the early phase after fracture (up to 72 h after trauma) near the fracture zone in muscle tissue was investigated in a pig model.
A mono- and polytrauma pig model (sole femur fracture or blunt thoracic trauma, hemorrhagic shock, liver laceration, and femur fracture) was used to demonstrate the immunological situation through muscle biopsies and their analysis by histology and qRT-PCR during a 72 h follow-up phase. Two stabilization methods were used (intramedullary nail vs. external fixator) and compared with a nontraumatized sham group.
Monotrauma shows higher PMNL numbers in muscle tissue compared with polytrauma (15.52 ± 5.39 mono vs. 8.23 ± 3.36 poly; p = 0.013), regardless of the treatment strategy. In contrast, polytrauma shows a longer lasting invasion of PMNL (24 h vs. 72 h). At 24 h in the case of monotrauma, the fracture treated with external fixation shows more PMNL than the fracture treated with intramedullary nailing (p = 0.026). This difference cannot be determined in polytrauma probably caused by a generalized immune response. Both monotrauma and polytrauma show a delayed PMNL increase in the muscle tissue of the uninjured side. The use of intramedullary nailing in monotrauma resulted in a significant increase in IL-6 (2 h after trauma) and IL-8 (24 and 48 h after trauma) transcription.
The reduction of PMNL invasion into the nearby muscle tissue of a monotrauma femur fracture stabilized by intramedullary nailing supports the advantages found in everyday clinical practice and therefore underlines the usage of nailing. For the polytrauma situation, the fixation seems to play a minor role, possibly due to a generalized immune reaction.
在单处和多处创伤性股骨骨折的稳定中,临床实践表明髓内钉的应用能提供更好的护理。然而,这一情况产生的原因尚不完全清楚。除了合并损伤外,免疫学方面也越来越受到重视。中性粒细胞(PMN),尤其是与其他免疫细胞类型一起,似乎与骨折愈合过程有关。出于这个原因,在猪模型中研究了骨折后早期(创伤后 72 小时内)骨折部位附近的肌肉组织。
使用单处和多处创伤性猪模型(单纯股骨骨折或钝性胸部创伤、失血性休克、肝脏裂伤和股骨骨折),通过肌肉活检,并通过组织学和 qRT-PCR 分析,在 72 小时的随访阶段展示免疫情况。使用两种固定方法(髓内钉与外固定器),并与未受伤的假手术组进行比较。
与多处创伤相比,单处创伤的肌肉组织中 PMNL 数量更高(15.52±5.39 单处 vs. 8.23±3.36 多处;p=0.013),与治疗策略无关。相比之下,多处创伤中 PMNL 的持续入侵时间更长(24 小时 vs. 72 小时)。在单处创伤的 24 小时时,与髓内钉治疗相比,外固定治疗的骨折处显示出更多的 PMNL(p=0.026)。在多处创伤中,由于普遍的免疫反应,可能无法确定这种差异。单处和多处创伤均显示未受伤侧肌肉组织中 PMNL 延迟增加。在单处创伤中使用髓内钉可显著增加 IL-6(创伤后 2 小时)和 IL-8(创伤后 24 和 48 小时)的转录。
髓内钉固定单处创伤性股骨骨折可减少 PMNL 侵入附近肌肉组织,这支持了日常临床实践中发现的优势,因此强调了髓内钉的使用。对于多处创伤情况,固定的作用似乎较小,可能是由于普遍的免疫反应。