• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反馈对类别学习中注意力分配的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。

The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study.

作者信息

Arbel Yael, Feeley Emily, He Xinyi

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:559334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334
PMID:33244302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7683802/
Abstract

It has been suggested that category learning involves changes in attention allocation based on the relevance of input to the classification. Using eye-gaze measures, Rehder and Hoffman studied changes in attention allocation during category learning in a 5-4 category structure paradigm with four features of varying diagnosticity levels. In this paradigm, participants are tasked with classifying creatures into two groups through trial and error guided by feedback. While learners' eye-gaze patterns have been studied as a function of feature diagnosticity levels throughout the learning process, they have not been evaluated in relation to performance and feedback. The present study borrowed and modified Rehder and Hoffman's category paradigm and evaluated eye-gaze behavior as a function of the diagnosticity level of features, and the valence (positive vs. negative) of the preceding feedback during learning. Our results support Rehder and Hoffman's observations that gaze on the low diagnosticity feature decreased from the beginning to the end of the task. When change in eye gaze behavior was evaluated in relation to feedback, change in was found to be greater following negative feedback. The results indicate that in a category task that includes performance feedback, learning strategies as indicated by changes in selective attention to features are affected to some degree by the valence of the feedback on a preceding trial.

摘要

有人认为类别学习涉及基于输入与分类的相关性而进行的注意力分配变化。Rehder和Hoffman使用眼动测量方法,在一个具有四个不同诊断性水平特征的5-4类别结构范式中研究了类别学习过程中注意力分配的变化。在这个范式中,参与者的任务是在反馈的引导下通过试错将生物分类为两组。虽然在整个学习过程中,学习者的眼动模式已被作为特征诊断性水平的函数进行研究,但尚未根据表现和反馈进行评估。本研究借鉴并修改了Rehder和Hoffman的类别范式,并将眼动行为评估为特征诊断性水平以及学习过程中先前反馈的效价(正与负)的函数。我们的结果支持Rehder和Hoffman的观察结果,即对低诊断性特征的注视从任务开始到结束有所减少。当根据反馈评估眼动行为的变化时,发现负面反馈后的变化更大。结果表明,在一个包含表现反馈的类别任务中,由对特征的选择性注意变化所表明的学习策略在某种程度上受到前一次试验中反馈效价的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/019875280374/fpsyg-11-559334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/6646f70d1761/fpsyg-11-559334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/19f486728fc4/fpsyg-11-559334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/6500533cf93a/fpsyg-11-559334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/019875280374/fpsyg-11-559334-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/6646f70d1761/fpsyg-11-559334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/19f486728fc4/fpsyg-11-559334-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/6500533cf93a/fpsyg-11-559334-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31f8/7683802/019875280374/fpsyg-11-559334-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study.反馈对类别学习中注意力分配的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:559334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334. eCollection 2020.
2
The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning.在类别学习过程中反馈处理中选择性注意的普遍性。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0259517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259517. eCollection 2021.
3
Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.通过分类和特征推理了解类别的内部结构。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1786-807. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.871567. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
Strategy Development and Feedback Processing During Complex Category Learning.复杂类别学习中的策略发展与反馈处理
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:672330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672330. eCollection 2021.
5
Errors, efficiency, and the interplay between attention and category learning.错误、效率以及注意力与类别学习之间的相互作用。
Cognition. 2009 Aug;112(2):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 May 29.
6
On the interaction of prior knowledge and stimulus structure in category learning.论类别学习中先验知识与刺激结构的相互作用
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 Feb;48(1):208-36. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401385.
7
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
8
A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm.一种使用双任务范式评估失语症患者和非失语症患者注意力分配的新型眼动追踪方法。
J Commun Disord. 2015 May-Jun;55:15-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
9
Observed attention allocation processes in category learning.类别学习中观察到的注意力分配过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1067-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438194.
10
A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation.概念形成中眼动的概率模型。
Neurocomputing (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;70(13-15):2256-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.026. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinguishing Social From Private Intentions Through the Passive Observation of Gaze Cues.通过对注视线索的被动观察区分社会意图与个人意图。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Dec 17;13:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00442. eCollection 2019.
2
Sequence as context in category learning: An eyetracking study.序列作为类别学习的上下文:一项眼动研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):1942-1954. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000693. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes.社交内容和情绪效价调节动态场景中的注视点。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 28;8(1):3804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22127-w.
4
Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning.比较正反馈和负反馈在信息整合类别学习中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jan;45(1):12-25. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0638-3.
5
Multidimensional representation of objects--The influence of task demands.物体的多维表征——任务需求的影响
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):405-11. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0894-4.
6
Maximization, learning, and economic behavior.最大化、学习和经济行为。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10818-25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402846111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
7
Counting multidimensional objects: implications for the neural-synchrony theory.多维物体的计数:对神经同步理论的启示。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar 1;24(3):266-71. doi: 10.1177/0956797612459761. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.有些特征是否比其他特征更容易结合?一致性效应。
Psychol Sci. 2010 May;21(5):676-81. doi: 10.1177/0956797610365130. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
9
Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.极度选择性注意:分类中对刺激特征的注意动态分配的眼动追踪研究。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1196-206. doi: 10.1037/a0016272.
10
Observed attention allocation processes in category learning.类别学习中观察到的注意力分配过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1067-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438194.