• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。

Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Developmental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005
PMID:30557748
Abstract

Gaze allocation to human faces has recently been shown to be greatly dependent on the social context. However, what has not been considered explicitly here, is how gaze allocation may be supportive of the specific task that individuals carry out. In the present study, we combined these two insights. We investigated (1) how gaze allocation to facial features in face-to-face communication is dependent on the task-structure and (2) how gaze allocation to facial features is dependent on the gaze behavior of an interacting partner. To this end, participants and a confederate were asked to converse, while their eye movements were monitored using a state-of-the-art dual eye-tracking system. This system is unique in that participants can look each other directly in the eyes. We report that gaze allocation depends on the sub-task being carried out (speaking vs. listening). Moreover, we show that a confederate's gaze shift away from the participants affects their gaze allocation more than a gaze shift towards them. In a second experiment, we show that this gaze-guidance effect is not primarily stimulus-driven. We assert that gaze guidance elicited by the confederate looking away is related to the participants' sub-task of monitoring the confederate for when they can begin speaking. This study exemplifies the importance of both task structure and social context for gaze allocation during face-to-face communication.

摘要

注视分配最近被证明在很大程度上取决于社会背景。然而,这里没有明确考虑到的是,注视分配如何支持个人执行的特定任务。在本研究中,我们结合了这两个观点。我们调查了(1)在面对面交流中,注视面部特征如何取决于任务结构,以及(2)注视面部特征如何取决于交互伙伴的注视行为。为此,要求参与者和一个同伙进行对话,同时使用最先进的双眼跟踪系统监测他们的眼球运动。该系统的独特之处在于,参与者可以直接注视对方的眼睛。我们报告说,注视分配取决于正在进行的子任务(说话与倾听)。此外,我们还表明,同伴的目光从参与者身上移开会比他们的目光移向同伴更能影响他们的目光分配。在第二个实验中,我们表明这种注视引导效应不是主要由刺激驱动的。我们断言,同伴看向别处引起的注视引导与参与者监控同伴何时可以开始说话的子任务有关。这项研究例证了任务结构和社会背景对面对面交流中注视分配的重要性。

相似文献

1
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
2
The dual function of social gaze.社会凝视的双重功能。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.040. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
3
Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study.现实世界社交互动中的注视:一项双眼追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2162-2173. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739221. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
4
Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.二元互动过程中对脸部的注视行为。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):226-242. doi: 10.1037/cep0000113. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.仅靠眼睛吗?对面部方向的注意力捕捉而言,感知眼神接触既非充分条件也非必要条件。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
Spontaneous attention to faces in Asperger syndrome using ecologically valid static stimuli.使用具有生态有效性的静态刺激物对阿斯伯格综合征中面孔的自发性注意。
Autism. 2013 Nov;17(6):754-61. doi: 10.1177/1362361312456746. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
7
Complementary effects of gaze direction and early saliency in guiding fixations during free viewing.自由观看过程中注视方向和早期显著性在引导注视方面的互补作用。
J Vis. 2014 Nov 4;14(13):3. doi: 10.1167/14.13.3.
8
Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.眼睛总是吸引注意力,但注视定向取决于任务:来自眼动监测的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 14;45(5):1019-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
9
Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.看法一致:社会注视互动会影响注视方向识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2755-2765. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01671-1.
10
Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking.动态情境中的目光分配:社会地位和说话的影响
Cognition. 2010 Dec;117(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.眼动追踪基础 第4部分:进行眼动追踪研究的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 6;57(1):46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.
2
Gaze-action coupling, gaze-gesture coupling, and exogenous attraction of gaze in dyadic interactions.二元互动中的注视-动作耦合、注视-手势耦合以及注视的外源性吸引。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2761-2777. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02978-4. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
AI can see you: Machiavellianism and extraversion are reflected in eye-movements.
人工智能能看穿你:眼动可反映出马基雅维利主义和外向性。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0308631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308631. eCollection 2024.
4
Stable eye versus mouth preference in a live speech-processing task.在实时言语处理任务中稳定的眼-口偏好。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 8;13(1):12878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40017-8.
5
The robustness of individual differences in gaze preferences toward faces and eyes across face-to-face experimental designs and its relation to social anxiety.个体在面对面实验设计中对视和眼神的偏好差异的稳健性及其与社交焦虑的关系。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):15. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.15.
6
Evaluating gaze behaviors as pre-touch reactions for virtual agents.将注视行为评估为虚拟代理的预触摸反应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1129677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129677. eCollection 2023.
7
Embodying cognitive ethology.体现认知行为学。
Theory Psychol. 2023 Feb;33(1):42-58. doi: 10.1177/09593543221126165. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
8
Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.眼动追踪:最小报告规范的实证基础。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):364-416. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Selective visual attention during public speaking in an immersive context.沉浸式环境下演讲时的选择性视觉注意力。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):396-407. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02430-x. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
10
Impact of perceived interpersonal similarity on attention to the eyes of same-race and other-race faces.感知人际相似性对视同种族和异种族面孔眼睛注视的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Nov 2;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00336-8.