• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

概念形成中眼动的概率模型。

A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation.

作者信息

Nelson Jonathan D, Cottrell Garrison W

机构信息

Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037 1099, USA.

出版信息

Neurocomputing (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;70(13-15):2256-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.026. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.026
PMID:22787288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3392133/
Abstract

It has been unclear whether optimal experimental design accounts of data selection may offer insight into evidence acquisition tasks in which the learner's beliefs change greatly during the course of learning. Data from Rehder and Hoffman's eye movement version of Shepard, Horland and Jenkins' classic concept learning task provide an opportunity to address these issues. We introduce a principled probabilistic concept-learning model that describes the development of subjects' beliefs on that task. We use that learning model, together with a sampling function inspired by theory of optimal experimental design, to predict subjects' eye movements on the active learning version of that task. Results show that the same rational sampling function can predict eye movements early in learning, when uncertainty is high, as well as late in learning when the learner is certain of the true category.

摘要

目前尚不清楚,关于数据选择的最优实验设计理论是否能为证据获取任务提供见解,在这些任务中,学习者的信念在学习过程中会发生很大变化。来自雷德和霍夫曼对谢泼德、霍兰德和詹金斯经典概念学习任务的眼动实验版本的数据,为解决这些问题提供了契机。我们引入了一个有原则的概率概念学习模型,该模型描述了受试者在该任务中信念的发展。我们使用该学习模型,结合受最优实验设计理论启发的采样函数,来预测受试者在该任务的主动学习版本中的眼动。结果表明,相同的理性采样函数能够预测学习初期不确定性较高时的眼动,以及学习后期学习者确定真实类别时的眼动。

相似文献

1
A probabilistic model of eye movements in concept formation.概念形成中眼动的概率模型。
Neurocomputing (Amst). 2007 Aug 1;70(13-15):2256-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.026. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
2
The Effect of Feedback on Attention Allocation in Category Learning: An Eye Tracking Study.反馈对类别学习中注意力分配的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;11:559334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559334. eCollection 2020.
3
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input.眼动证据表明,读者会对过去的语言输入保持并采取不确定性措施。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21086-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907664106. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
4
Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961).比较基于规则的分类学习模型:谢泼德、霍夫兰德和詹金斯(1961年)的复制与扩展
Mem Cognit. 1994 May;22(3):352-69. doi: 10.3758/bf03200862.
5
Moving to Learn: How Guiding the Hands Can Set the Stage for Learning.在移动中学习:手部引导如何为学习奠定基础。
Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;40(7):1831-1849. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12292. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
6
Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.类别学习中的眼动追踪与选择性注意
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
7
Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing.感觉处理变化后动眼学习的领域特异性
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;37(47):11469-11484. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1208-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
8
Multi-step planning of eye movements in visual search.视觉搜索中的多步骤眼动计划。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 15;9(1):144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37536-0.
9
Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.学习对不寻常面孔的最佳眼动方式。
Vision Res. 2014 Jun;99:57-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.005. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Inhibition of Eye Movements Disrupts Spatial Sequence Learning.抑制眼球运动可破坏空间序列学习。
Exp Psychol. 2021 Jul;68(4):221-228. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000528.

引用本文的文献

1
As within, so without, as above, so below: Common mechanisms can support between- and within-trial category learning dynamics.心物一如,上下同理:共同的机制可以支持试验内和试验间的类别学习动态。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Oct;129(5):1104-1143. doi: 10.1037/rev0000381. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
LAG-1: A dynamic, integrative model of learning, attention, and gaze.LAG-1:一种动态的、综合的学习、注意力和注视模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0259511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259511. eCollection 2022.
3
Bidirectional influences of information sampling and concept learning.信息采样和概念学习的双向影响。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;129(2):213-234. doi: 10.1037/rev0000287. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Children flexibly seek visual information to support signed and spoken language comprehension.儿童灵活地寻找视觉信息来支持手语和口语理解。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jun;149(6):1078-1096. doi: 10.1037/xge0000702. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Active sensing in the categorization of visual patterns.视觉模式分类中的主动感知。
Elife. 2016 Feb 10;5:e12215. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12215.
6
How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: an eyetracking study.先前知识如何影响类别学习中的选择性注意:一项眼动研究。
Mem Cognit. 2011 May;39(4):649-65. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0050-3.
7
Reading as active sensing: a computational model of gaze planning in word recognition.阅读即主动感知:文字识别中注视计划的计算模型。
Front Neurorobot. 2010 Jun 3;4:6. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2010.00006. eCollection 2010.
8
Experience matters: information acquisition optimizes probability gain.经验很重要:信息获取能优化概率收益。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):960-9. doi: 10.1177/0956797610372637. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
9
NIMBLE: a kernel density model of saccade-based visual memory.NIMBLE:一种基于扫视的视觉记忆的核密度模型。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 12;8(14):17.1-14. doi: 10.1167/8.14.17.

本文引用的文献

1
Observed attention allocation processes in category learning.类别学习中观察到的注意力分配过程。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1067-97. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438194.
2
Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures.人类皮层下结构中预期奖励与风险的神经分化
Neuron. 2006 Aug 3;51(3):381-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024.
3
Finding useful questions: on Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain.寻找有用的问题:关于贝叶斯诊断性、概率、影响和信息增益
Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):979-99. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.979.
4
An information maximization model of eye movements.眼动的信息最大化模型。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2005;17:1121-8.
5
Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.类别学习中的眼动追踪与选择性注意
Cogn Psychol. 2005 Aug;51(1):1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.11.001. Epub 2005 Mar 19.
6
Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.视觉搜索中的最佳眼动策略
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):387-91. doi: 10.1038/nature03390.
7
Value of information literature analysis: a review of applications in health risk management.信息价值文献分析:健康风险管理应用综述
Med Decis Making. 2004 May-Jun;24(3):287-98. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04263157.
8
The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.阅读中眼动控制的E-Z读者模型:与其他模型的比较。
Behav Brain Sci. 2003 Aug;26(4):445-76; discussion 477-526. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x03000104.
9
Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements.统计决策理论与快速目标导向运动的选择
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Jul;20(7):1419-33. doi: 10.1364/josaa.20.001419.
10
Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.迈向一种在认知计算模型中进行选择的方法。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jul;109(3):472-91. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.472.