Kwan Jennifer M, Toubat Omar, Harrison Andrew M, Riddle Megan, Wu Brian, Kim Hajwa, Basta David W, Adami Alexander J, Daye Dania
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
American Physician Scientists Association (APSA), Westford, MA, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 4;4(4):307-316. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.18.
While previous studies have described career outcomes of physician-scientist trainees after graduation, trainee perceptions of research-intensive career pathways remain unclear. This study sought to identify the perceived interests, factors, and challenges associated with academic and research careers among predoctoral MD trainees, MD trainees with research-intense (>50%) career intentions (MD-RI), and MD-PhD trainees.
A 70-question survey was administered to 16,418 trainees at 32 academic medical centers from September 2012 to December 2014. MD vs. MD-RI (>50% research intentions) vs. MD-PhD trainee responses were compared by chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with academic and research career intentions.
There were 4433 respondents (27% response rate), including 2625 MD (64%), 653 MD-RI (15%), and 856 MD-PhD (21%) trainees. MD-PhDs were most interested in pursuing academia (85.8%), followed by MD-RIs (57.3%) and MDs (31.2%). Translational research was the primary career intention for MD-PhD trainees (42.9%). Clinical duties were the primary career intention for MD-RIs (51.9%) and MDs (84.2%). While 39.8% of MD-PhD respondents identified opportunities for research as the most important career selection factor, only 12.9% of MD-RI and 0.5% of MD respondents shared this perspective. Interest in basic research, translational research, clinical research, education, and the ability to identify a mentor were each independently associated with academic career intentions by multivariate regression.
Predoctoral MD, MD-RI, and MD-PhD trainees are unique cohorts with different perceptions and interests toward academic and research careers. Understanding these differences may help to guide efforts to mentor the next generation of physician-scientists.
虽然先前的研究描述了医师 - 科学家学员毕业后的职业成果,但学员对研究密集型职业道路的看法仍不明确。本研究旨在确定博士前医学博士学员、有研究密集型(>50%)职业意向的医学博士学员(MD-RI)和医学博士 - 哲学博士学员对学术和研究职业的感知兴趣、因素及挑战。
2012年9月至2014年12月期间,对32个学术医学中心的16418名学员进行了一项包含70个问题的调查。通过卡方检验比较医学博士与MD-RI(研究意向>50%)与医学博士 - 哲学博士学员的回答。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定与学术和研究职业意向相关的变量。
共有4433名受访者(回复率27%),包括2625名医学博士(64%)、653名MD-RI(15%)和856名医学博士 - 哲学博士(21%)学员。医学博士 - 哲学博士学员对从事学术工作最感兴趣(85.8%),其次是MD-RI(57.3%)和医学博士(31.2%)。转化研究是医学博士 - 哲学博士学员的主要职业意向(42.9%)。临床工作是MD-RI(51.9%)和医学博士(84.2%)的主要职业意向。虽然39.8%的医学博士 - 哲学博士受访者将研究机会视为最重要的职业选择因素,但只有12.9%的MD-RI和0.5%的医学博士受访者持此观点。多因素回归分析显示,对基础研究、转化研究、临床研究、教育的兴趣以及找到导师的能力均与学术职业意向独立相关。
博士前医学博士、MD-RI和医学博士 - 哲学博士学员是对学术和研究职业有不同看法和兴趣的独特群体。了解这些差异可能有助于指导对下一代医师 - 科学家的指导工作。