Suppr超能文献

美国医学院系教师生产力评估:一项全国性调查。

Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey.

作者信息

Kairouz Victor F, Raad Dany, Fudyma John, Curtis Anne B, Schünemann Holger J, Akl Elie A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 26;14:205. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-205.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faculty productivity is essential for academic medical centers striving to achieve excellence and national recognition. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether and how academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation.

METHODS

We surveyed the Chairs of academic Departments of Medicine in the United States in 2012. We sent a paper-based questionnaire along with a personalized invitation letter by postal mail. For non-responders, we sent reminder letters, then called them and faxed them the questionnaire. The questionnaire included 8 questions with 23 tabulated close-ended items about the types of productivity measured (clinical, research, teaching, administrative) and the measurement strategies used. We conducted descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

Chairs of 78 of 152 eligible departments responded to the survey (51% response rate). Overall, 82% of respondents reported measuring at least one type of faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Amongst those measuring faculty productivity, types measured were: clinical (98%), research (61%), teaching (62%), and administrative (64%). Percentages of respondents who reported the use of standardized measurements units (e.g., Relative Value Units (RVUs)) varied from 17% for administrative productivity to 95% for research productivity. Departments reported a wide variation of what exact activities are measured and how they are monetarily compensated. Most compensation plans take into account academic rank (77%). The majority of compensation plans are in the form of a bonus on top of a fixed salary (66%) and/or an adjustment of salary based on previous period productivity (55%).

CONCLUSION

Our survey suggests that most academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity and convert it into standardized units for the purpose of salary compensation. The exact activities that are measured and how they are monetarily compensated varied substantially across departments.

摘要

背景

教员生产力对于努力追求卓越并获得全国认可的学术医疗中心至关重要。本研究的目的是评估美国医学院系是否以及如何衡量教员生产力以用于薪资补偿。

方法

2012年,我们对美国医学院系的系主任进行了调查。我们通过邮政邮件发送了纸质问卷以及个性化邀请函。对于未回复者,我们发送了提醒信,然后致电并向他们传真问卷。问卷包含8个问题以及23个关于所衡量的生产力类型(临床、研究、教学、行政)和所使用的衡量策略的列表式封闭式项目。我们进行了描述性分析。

结果

152个符合条件的系中的78个系的系主任回复了调查(回复率为51%)。总体而言,82%的受访者表示为了薪资补偿而衡量至少一种教员生产力类型。在衡量教员生产力的受访者中,所衡量的类型包括:临床(98%)、研究(61%)、教学(62%)和行政(64%)。报告使用标准化衡量单位(例如相对价值单位(RVU))的受访者比例从行政生产力的17%到研究生产力的95%不等。各系报告了所衡量的具体活动以及它们如何获得货币补偿存在很大差异。大多数薪酬计划考虑学术职称(77%)。大多数薪酬计划采取在固定薪资基础上发放奖金(66%)和/或根据上一时期的生产力调整薪资(55%)的形式。

结论

我们的调查表明,美国大多数医学院系衡量教员生产力并将其转换为标准化单位以用于薪资补偿。各系所衡量的具体活动以及它们如何获得货币补偿差异很大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验