Department of Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr., Moscow, ID, 83844, U.S.A.
Division of Fish and Wildlife, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN, 55155, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2020 Dec;34(6):1339-1352. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13623.
Conservation science and practice commonly draw on the theories and methods of social psychology to explain human cognition, emotion, and behavior germane to biodiversity conservation. We created a systematic map of the cross-disciplinary conservation science literature, which draws on social psychology concepts and methods in their application broadly described as conservation psychology. Established protocols were used to systematically collect and collate peer-reviewed research published in an explicit selection of multidisciplinary conservation journals. We sought to catalog the literature, elucidate trends and gaps, and critically reflect on the state of conservation psychology and its research practices that aim to influence conservation outcomes. The volume of publications per year and per decade increased from 1974 to 2016. Although a diversity of research designs and methods was applied, studies disproportionately focused on specific concepts (attitudes and beliefs), locations (North America and Europe), and contexts (terrestrial, rural). Studies also tended to be descriptive, quantitative, and atheoretical in nature. Our findings demonstrate that although conservation psychology has generally become more visible and prominent, it has done so within a limited space and suggest that disciplinary research principles and reporting standards must be more universally adopted by traditional and multidisciplinary conservation journals to raise the floor of empirical research.
保护科学和实践通常借鉴社会心理学的理论和方法,来解释与生物多样性保护相关的人类认知、情感和行为。我们创建了一个跨学科保护科学文献的系统图谱,该图谱广泛借鉴社会心理学概念和方法,这些方法在被描述为保护心理学的应用中得到了应用。我们使用既定的方案,系统地收集和整理了在明确选择的多学科保护期刊上发表的同行评审研究。我们试图对文献进行编目,阐明趋势和差距,并批判性地反思保护心理学及其研究实践的状况,这些实践旨在影响保护成果。1974 年至 2016 年,每年和每十年的出版物数量都有所增加。尽管应用了多种研究设计和方法,但研究仍然主要集中在特定的概念(态度和信念)、地点(北美和欧洲)和背景(陆地、农村)上。研究也往往具有描述性、定量性和非理论性。我们的研究结果表明,尽管保护心理学的知名度和重要性总体上有所提高,但它的发展空间仍然有限,并表明传统和多学科保护期刊必须更普遍地采用学科研究原则和报告标准,以提高实证研究的门槛。