Suppr超能文献

动物园和水族馆保护教育评估中的研究方法和报告实践。

Research methods and reporting practices in zoo and aquarium conservation-education evaluation.

机构信息

Conservation Psychology and Applied Animal Behaviour Centre, School of Psychology, Social Work, and Social Policy, Magill Campus, St Bernards Road, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.

Centre for Applied Psychological Research, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, Magill Campus, St Bernards Road, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2019 Feb;33(1):40-52. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13177. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

Abstract

Zoos and aquariums are increasingly incorporating conservation education into their mission statements and visitor experiences to address global biodiversity loss. To advance knowledge and practice in the field, research is being conducted to evaluate the effect of zoo conservation-education experiences on visitor psychosocial outcomes (e.g., knowledge, attitude, emotions, motivations, behavior). Following recent discussions among scholars and practitioners concerning logistical and methodological challenges that likely undermine the conclusions of such research, we identified and reviewed the methods and reporting practices in peer-reviewed articles published in English from May 1998 to June 2016 that focused on adult visitor samples (47 articles, 48 studies). We examined elements of internal, external, construct, and statistical conclusion validity. Methodological quality of quantitative methods and reporting practices was determined using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Each study was coded as either strong (no weak ratings), moderate (1 weak rating), or weak (≥2 weak ratings). The quantitative methods of 83.3% of studies were weak. The remaining 16.7% had methods of moderate quality. Using an existing checklist, we also assessed the quality and rigor of qualitative methods and reporting practices and found that some aspects of these methods were reported more comprehensively than others. For example, 69.6% of articles discussed methods for identifying key themes from the data, whereas only 34.8% reported how data verification was performed. We suggest increased application of intensive longitudinal methods (e.g., daily diary) to strengthen self-reported data, experimental and repeated-measures designs, and mixed-methods approaches. Our findings and recommendations could strengthen and guide the research and evaluation agenda for the field and ultimately enhance the contribution zoos make to global biodiversity conservation.

摘要

动物园和水族馆越来越多地将保护教育纳入其使命声明和游客体验中,以应对全球生物多样性的丧失。为了推进该领域的知识和实践,正在进行研究以评估动物园保护教育体验对游客心理社会结果(例如,知识,态度,情感,动机,行为)的影响。在学者和从业人员最近就可能破坏此类研究结论的后勤和方法学挑战进行讨论之后,我们确定并审查了 1998 年 5 月至 2016 年 6 月期间以成年游客样本为重点(47 篇文章,48 项研究)的同行评审文章中发表的方法和报告做法。我们检查了内部,外部,构建和统计结论有效性的要素。使用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具确定定量方法和报告实践的方法学质量。将每种研究方法编码为强(无弱评级),中(1 个弱评级)或弱(≥2 个弱评级)。83.3%的研究定量方法较弱。其余 16.7%的研究方法质量中等。我们还使用现有的清单评估了定性方法和报告实践的质量和严谨性,并发现这些方法的某些方面比其他方面报告得更全面。例如,69.6%的文章讨论了从数据中识别关键主题的方法,而只有 34.8%的文章报告了如何进行数据验证。我们建议更多地应用密集纵向方法(例如,每日日记)来加强自我报告数据,实验和重复测量设计以及混合方法方法。我们的发现和建议可以加强和指导该领域的研究和评估议程,并最终增强动物园对全球生物多样性保护的贡献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验