Bouchard J M, Delaunay J, Delisle J P, Grasset N, Mermberg P F, Molczadzki M, Pagot R, Richou H, Robert G, Ropert R
C.H.S. Gérard Machant, Toulouse.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1987 Nov;76(5):583-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02923.x.
In a double-blind trial, comprising 96 depressed patients, citalopram was compared with maprotiline. The trial period was 6 weeks with ratings (MADRS, CGI) and side effects recordings taking place at Weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6. Both drugs were administered as a single evening dose, 40 or 60 mg for citalopram, and 75 or 150 mg for maprotiline. MADRS total scores and CGI scores showed a highly significant reduction in both groups with no significant difference between them, whether the groups were considered as a whole or whether they were subdivided into endogenously/non-endogenously depressed or melancholic/non-melancholic patients. Side effects were not significantly different, but the maprotiline group showed more anticholinergic side effects, whereas the citalopram group showed more nausea, increased sweating and headache. Two patients on maprotiline were withdrawn because of side effects (hypotension and somnolence in the one case; tremor and insomnia in the other). One patient in each group was withdrawn because of increased transaminases, the citalopram-treated patient having increased values, however, already at baseline. Apart from this, no cardiovascular side effects and no pathological laboratory values related to treatment were observed. The authors conclude that citalopram is a safe antidepressant drug and as effective as maprotiline.
在一项包含96名抑郁症患者的双盲试验中,将西酞普兰与马普替林进行了比较。试验期为6周,在第0、1、2、4和6周进行评分(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表、临床总体印象量表)及副作用记录。两种药物均在晚上单次给药,西酞普兰剂量为40或60毫克,马普替林剂量为75或150毫克。蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表总分和临床总体印象量表评分显示两组均有高度显著降低,两组之间无显著差异,无论将两组视为一个整体,还是将其细分为内源性/非内源性抑郁症患者或忧郁症/非忧郁症患者。副作用无显著差异,但马普替林组显示出更多的抗胆碱能副作用,而西酞普兰组显示出更多的恶心、出汗增多和头痛。两名服用马普替林的患者因副作用退出(一例为低血压和嗜睡;另一例为震颤和失眠)。每组各有一名患者因转氨酶升高退出,然而,接受西酞普兰治疗的患者在基线时转氨酶值就已升高。除此之外,未观察到心血管副作用以及与治疗相关的病理实验室值。作者得出结论,西酞普兰是一种安全的抗抑郁药物,与马普替林一样有效。