Suppr超能文献

性侵犯证据差异提取的分析方法。

Analytical approaches to differential extraction for sexual assault evidence.

作者信息

Clark Charles, Turiello Rachelle, Cotton Robin, Landers James P

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

出版信息

Anal Chim Acta. 2021 Jan 2;1141:230-245. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.07.059. Epub 2020 Aug 12.

Abstract

Many forensic laboratories face growing demands for the processing of DNA evidence from sexual assault investigations. In these cases, evidence collected from the crime scene or from the victim in the form of a Sexual Assault and Evidence Collection Kit (SAECK) typically contains a mixture of cells from at least two donors. Isolation of DNA contributions to link a sample to an alleged offender requires precise chemical treatment of each sample with the goal of separating epithelial cells from non-sperm cells. Currently, the vast majority of laboratories employ differential chemical lysis methods that require lengthy incubations and several manual steps, preventing complete automation. Numerous alternative methods for the differential extraction (DE) of sexual assault evidence have been developed to provide a solution to the growing backlog of samples observed in the US and other countries. Here, we will discuss the predominant methodology for the DE of DNA from sexual assault samples and review alternative approaches from literature. We illustrate three criteria that provide a measure of success in performing these types of chemical separations and examine all methods based upon these expectations. We conclude by providing some general insight into the application of DE techniques in forensic laboratories and discuss the potential future directions of alternative technologies.

摘要

许多法医实验室处理性侵犯调查中DNA证据的需求日益增长。在这些案件中,从犯罪现场或受害者那里以性侵犯和证据收集试剂盒(SAECK)形式收集的证据通常包含至少两个捐赠者的细胞混合物。分离DNA贡献以将样本与被指控的犯罪者联系起来,需要对每个样本进行精确的化学处理,目的是将上皮细胞与非精子细胞分离。目前,绝大多数实验室采用差异化学裂解方法,这种方法需要长时间孵育和几个手动步骤,无法实现完全自动化。为了解决美国和其他国家出现的样本积压问题,已经开发了许多用于性侵犯证据差异提取(DE)的替代方法。在这里,我们将讨论从性侵犯样本中提取DNA的主要方法,并回顾文献中的替代方法。我们阐述了三个衡量这些类型化学分离成功与否的标准,并根据这些期望审视所有方法。最后,我们对DE技术在法医实验室中的应用提供一些一般性见解,并讨论替代技术未来可能的发展方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验