Suppr超能文献

关于生物医学研究中动态同意的思考:迄今为止的故事。

Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.

机构信息

Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Health, Law and Emerging Technologies, Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):649-656. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00771-z. Epub 2020 Nov 28.

Abstract

Dynamic consent (DC) was originally developed in response to challenges to the informed consent process presented by participants agreeing to 'future research' in biobanking. In the past 12 years, it has been trialled in a number of different projects, and examined as a new approach for consent and to support patient engagement over time. There have been significant societal shifts during this time, namely in our reliance on digital tools and the use of social media, as well as a greater appreciation of the integral role of patients in biomedical research. This paper reflects on the development of DC to understand its importance in an age where digital health is becoming the norm and patients require greater oversight and control of how their data may be used in a range of settings. As well as looking back, it looks forwards to consider how DC could be further utilised to enhance the patient experience and address some of the inequalities caused by the digital divide in society.

摘要

动态同意(DC)最初是为了应对生物库中参与者同意“未来研究”时对知情同意过程提出的挑战而开发的。在过去的 12 年中,它已经在许多不同的项目中进行了试验,并被视为一种新的同意方式,以支持患者随着时间的推移参与。在此期间,社会发生了重大转变,例如我们对数字工具的依赖以及社交媒体的使用,以及对患者在生物医学研究中不可或缺作用的认识不断提高。本文回顾了 DC 的发展历程,以了解其在数字健康成为常态的时代的重要性,在这个时代,患者需要对其数据在各种环境中的使用方式进行更多的监督和控制。本文不仅回顾过去,还展望未来,探讨如何进一步利用 DC 来改善患者体验,并解决社会数字鸿沟造成的一些不平等问题。

相似文献

1
Reflections on dynamic consent in biomedical research: the story so far.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):649-656. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00771-z. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
Biobanks need publicity.
Nature. 2011 Mar 10;471(7337):159-60. doi: 10.1038/471159a.
4
The moral concerns of biobank donors: the effect of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s40504-016-0036-4. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
5
Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Jul;15(3):175-186. doi: 10.1177/1556264619887073. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
6
Perception of Polish patients with cancer of the ethical and legal issues related to biobank research.
Oncologist. 2024 Jul 5;29(7):e887-e898. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae078.
7
Informed consent to tissue donation: policies and practice.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2009 Aug;10(3):235-40. doi: 10.1007/s10561-008-9115-y. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
10
Effect of deliberation on the public's attitudes toward consent policies for biobank research.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Feb;26(2):176-185. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0063-5. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Perspectives of Research Ethics Committees on the Challenges of Human Genomic Research Participation in Ethiopia.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Jul;20(3):162-174. doi: 10.1177/15562646251339221. Epub 2025 May 13.
3
Regulating neural data processing in the age of BCIs: Ethical concerns and legal approaches.
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 28;11:20552076251326123. doi: 10.1177/20552076251326123. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
On the ethical governance of swarm robotic systems in the real world.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2025 Jan 30;383(2289):20240142. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0142.
6
How to communicate and what to disclose to participants in a recall-by-genotype research approach: a multistep empirical study.
J Community Genet. 2024 Dec;15(6):615-630. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00733-8. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy.
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 14;15:1397156. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156. eCollection 2024.
9
The Ethics of Decentralized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent: Taking Technologies' Soft Impacts into Account.
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jun;33(2):139-150. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00483-1. Epub 2024 May 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The Genetic Family as Patient?
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):77-80. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754505.
4
Authority and the Future of Consent in Population-Level Biomedical Research.
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Oct 30;12(3):225-236. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz015. eCollection 2019 Nov.
5
Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Jul;15(3):175-186. doi: 10.1177/1556264619887073. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.
Front Public Health. 2018 Sep 5;6:253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00253. eCollection 2018.
8
Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;46(1):119-129. doi: 10.1177/1073110518766026. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
9
Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.
Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644. doi: 10.1177/2055207615605644. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验