• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚团结健康倡议(ATHENA)项目动态知情同意平台开发的启示:访谈和调查研究。

Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

The Australians Together Health Initiative Program (The ATHENA Program), Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 6;8:e57165. doi: 10.2196/57165.

DOI:10.2196/57165
PMID:39504120
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11579620/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dynamic consent has the potential to address many of the issues facing traditional paper-based or electronic consent, including enrolling informed and engaged participants in the decision-making process. The Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) program aims to connect participants across Queensland, Australia, with new research opportunities. At its core is dynamic consent, an interactive and participant-centric digital platform that enables users to view ongoing research activities, update consent preferences, and have ongoing engagement with researchers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the development of the ATHENA dynamic consent platform within the framework of the ATHENA program, including how the platform was designed, its utilization by participants, and the insights gained.

METHODS

One-on-one interviews were undertaken with consumers, followed by a workshop with health care staff to gain insights into the dynamic consent concept. Five problem statements were developed, and solutions were posed, from which a dynamic consent platform was constructed, tested, and used for implementation in a clinical trial. Potential users were randomly recruited from a pre-existing pool of 615 participants in the ATHENA program. Feedback on user platform experience was gained from a survey hosted on the platform.

RESULTS

In the 13 consumer interviews undertaken, participants were positive about dynamic consent, valuing privacy, ease of use, and adequate communication. Motivators for registration were feedback on data usage and its broader community benefits. Problem statements were security, trust and governance, ease of use, communication, control, and need for a scalable platform. Using the newly constructed dynamic consent platform, 99 potential participants were selected, of whom 67 (68%) were successfully recontacted. Of these, 59 (88%) agreed to be sent the platform, 44 (74%) logged on (indicating use), and 22 (57%) registered for the clinical trial. Survey feedback was favorable, with an average positive rating of 78% across all questions, reflecting satisfaction with the clarity, brevity, and flexibility of the platform. Barriers to implementation included technological and health literacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the successful development and testing of a dynamic consent platform that was well-accepted, with users recognizing its advantages over traditional methods of consent regarding flexibility, ease of communication, and participant satisfaction. This information may be useful to other researchers who plan to use dynamic consent in health care research.

摘要

背景

动态同意有可能解决传统纸质或电子同意书面临的许多问题,包括让知情和参与的参与者参与决策过程。澳大利亚团结健康倡议(ATHENA)计划旨在将澳大利亚昆士兰州的参与者与新的研究机会联系起来。其核心是动态同意,这是一个互动的、以参与者为中心的数字平台,使用户能够查看正在进行的研究活动、更新同意偏好,并与研究人员保持持续互动。

目的

本研究旨在描述 ATHENA 计划中 ATHENA 动态同意平台的开发情况,包括平台的设计方式、参与者的使用情况以及获得的见解。

方法

对消费者进行了一对一访谈,随后与医疗保健人员一起举办了一次研讨会,以了解动态同意的概念。制定了五个问题陈述,并提出了解决方案,由此构建、测试了一个动态同意平台,并将其用于临床试验的实施。潜在用户是从 ATHENA 计划中现有的 615 名参与者中随机招募的。在平台上托管的调查中获得了对用户平台体验的反馈。

结果

在进行的 13 次消费者访谈中,参与者对动态同意持积极态度,重视隐私、易用性和充分的沟通。注册的动机是对数据使用及其更广泛的社区利益的反馈。问题陈述包括安全性、信任和治理、易用性、沟通、控制和对可扩展平台的需求。使用新构建的动态同意平台,选择了 99 名潜在参与者,其中 67 名(68%)成功重新联系。在这些人中,有 59 名(88%)同意发送平台,44 名(74%)登录(表示使用),22 名(57%)注册参加临床试验。调查反馈是积极的,所有问题的平均正面评价率为 78%,反映了参与者对平台的清晰度、简洁性和灵活性的满意。实施的障碍包括技术和健康素养。

结论

本研究描述了一个成功开发和测试的动态同意平台,该平台得到了广泛认可,用户认识到它在灵活性、沟通便利性和参与者满意度方面优于传统的同意方法。这些信息可能对其他计划在医疗保健研究中使用动态同意的研究人员有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/53925d09f1d3/formative_v8i1e57165_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/844579a1d523/formative_v8i1e57165_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/0d99b8322e25/formative_v8i1e57165_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/53925d09f1d3/formative_v8i1e57165_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/844579a1d523/formative_v8i1e57165_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/0d99b8322e25/formative_v8i1e57165_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/11579620/53925d09f1d3/formative_v8i1e57165_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.澳大利亚团结健康倡议(ATHENA)项目动态知情同意平台开发的启示:访谈和调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 6;8:e57165. doi: 10.2196/57165.
2
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
3
Consent to recontact for future research using linked primary healthcare data: Outcomes and general practice perceptions from the ATHENA COVID-19 study.同意使用关联的初级医疗保健数据进行未来研究的再联系:ATHENA COVID-19研究的结果及全科医疗看法
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):188-199. doi: 10.1177/17407745241304094. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial evaluating video-assisted electronic consent vs standard consent for patients initiating and continuing haemodialysis in Australia (eConsent HD).评估澳大利亚开始和继续血液透析患者的视频辅助电子知情同意与标准知情同意的混合有效性-实施临床试验方案(eConsent HD)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 11;14(7):e081181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081181.
6
Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants.数字健康研究中影响知情同意偏好的因素:对潜在参与者的调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e63349. doi: 10.2196/63349.
7
Effectiveness of Telehealth Versus In-Person Informed Consent: Randomized Study of Comprehension and Decision-Making.远程医疗与亲自进行知情同意的效果:关于理解与决策的随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 5;27:e63473. doi: 10.2196/63473.
8
Opportunities and challenges of a dynamic consent-based application: personalized options for personal health data sharing and utilization.动态同意制应用的机遇与挑战:个性化选择实现个人健康数据的共享和利用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 31;25(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01091-3.
9
'CTRL': an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research.'CTRL': 一个在线的、动态同意和参与者参与平台,致力于解决基因组研究中同意的复杂性。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):687-698. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
The Smarter Safer Homes Solution to Support Older People Living in Their Own Homes Through Enhanced Care Models: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.通过强化护理模式支持老年人居家生活的更智能、更安全的家庭解决方案:一项分层随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 24;11(1):e31970. doi: 10.2196/31970.

本文引用的文献

1
Participant characteristics and reasons for non-consent to health information linkage for research: experiences from the ATHENA COVID-19 study.参与者特征及对健康信息关联用于研究的不同意原因:来自 ATHENA COVID-19 研究的经验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02370-6.
2
Evaluation of CTRL: a web application for dynamic consent and engagement with individuals involved in a cardiovascular genetic disorders cohort.评估 CTRL:一个用于心血管遗传疾病队列中个体的动态同意和参与的网络应用程序。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):61-68. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01454-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.
电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
4
Dynamic consent, communication and return of results in large-scale health data reuse: Survey of public preferences.大规模健康数据再利用中的动态同意、沟通与结果反馈:公众偏好调查
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 16;9:20552076231190997. doi: 10.1177/20552076231190997. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
A GDPR-Compliant Dynamic Consent Mobile Application for the Australasian Type-1 Diabetes Data Network.一款符合通用数据保护条例(GDPR)的动态同意移动应用程序,用于澳大拉西亚1型糖尿病数据网络。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;11(4):496. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040496.
6
Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process.CHRIS 研究中的十年动态同意:知情同意作为一个动态过程。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1391-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01160-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
7
METORY: Development of a Demand-Driven Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Platform Tailored for Clinical Trials.METORY:为临床试验量身定制的基于需求驱动的区块链动态同意平台的开发。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 13;9:837197. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.837197. eCollection 2022.
8
Dynamic consent and personalised medicine.动态同意与个性化医疗。
Med J Aust. 2022 Jun 20;216(11):547-549. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51555. Epub 2022 May 24.
9
Exploring reasons for recruitment failure in clinical trials: a qualitative study with clinical trial stakeholders in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada.探索临床试验招募失败的原因:一项对瑞士、德国和加拿大临床试验利益相关者的定性研究。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05818-0.
10
The ATHENA COVID-19 Study: Cohort profile and first findings for people diagnosed with COVID-19 in Queensland, 1 January to 31 December 2020.ATHENA新冠病毒研究:2020年1月1日至12月31日昆士兰州新冠病毒确诊患者的队列概况及初步研究结果
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2021 Sep 30;45. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2021.45.51.