• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

'CTRL': 一个在线的、动态同意和参与者参与平台,致力于解决基因组研究中同意的复杂性。

'CTRL': an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research.

机构信息

Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):687-698. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w
PMID:33408362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8115139/
Abstract

The complexities of the informed consent process for participating in research in genomic medicine are well-documented. Inspired by the potential for Dynamic Consent to increase participant choice and autonomy in decision-making, as well as the opportunities for ongoing participant engagement it affords, we wanted to trial Dynamic Consent and to do so developed our own web-based application (web app) called CTRL (control). This paper documents the design and development of CTRL, for use in the Australian Genomics study: a health services research project building evidence to inform the integration of genomic medicine into mainstream healthcare. Australian Genomics brought together a multi-disciplinary team to develop CTRL. The design and development process considered user experience; security and privacy; the application of international standards in data sharing; IT, operational and ethical issues. The CTRL tool is now being offered to participants in the study, who can use CTRL to keep personal and contact details up to date; make consent choices (including indicate preferences for return of results and future research use of biological samples, genomic and health data); follow their progress through the study; complete surveys, contact the researchers and access study news and information. While there are remaining challenges to implementing Dynamic Consent in genomic research, this study demonstrates the feasibility of building such a tool, and its ongoing use will provide evidence about the value of Dynamic Consent in large-scale genomic research programs.

摘要

参与基因组医学研究的知情同意过程的复杂性是有据可查的。受动态同意增加参与者在决策中的选择和自主权的潜力以及它提供的持续参与机会的启发,我们希望试用动态同意,并为此开发了自己的基于网络的应用程序(网络应用程序),称为 CTRL(控制)。本文介绍了 CTRL 的设计和开发,用于澳大利亚基因组学研究:一个构建证据的卫生服务研究项目,为将基因组医学纳入主流医疗保健提供信息。澳大利亚基因组学汇集了一个多学科团队来开发 CTRL。设计和开发过程考虑了用户体验;安全性和隐私;数据共享方面的国际标准的应用;IT、运营和道德问题。该 CTRL 工具现在提供给研究中的参与者,他们可以使用 CTRL 来更新个人和联系信息;做出同意选择(包括表示对结果的返回和对生物样本、基因组和健康数据的未来研究使用的偏好);跟踪他们在研究中的进展;完成调查、联系研究人员并访问研究新闻和信息。虽然在基因组研究中实施动态同意仍然存在挑战,但本研究证明了构建此类工具的可行性,并且其持续使用将提供关于动态同意在大规模基因组研究计划中的价值的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/fdf701117b36/41431_2020_782_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/26f1f5ecde73/41431_2020_782_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/0cd31423ddc3/41431_2020_782_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/fdf701117b36/41431_2020_782_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/26f1f5ecde73/41431_2020_782_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/0cd31423ddc3/41431_2020_782_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dde0/8115139/fdf701117b36/41431_2020_782_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
'CTRL': an online, Dynamic Consent and participant engagement platform working towards solving the complexities of consent in genomic research.'CTRL': 一个在线的、动态同意和参与者参与平台,致力于解决基因组研究中同意的复杂性。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr;29(4):687-698. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00782-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
Evaluation of CTRL: a web application for dynamic consent and engagement with individuals involved in a cardiovascular genetic disorders cohort.评估 CTRL:一个用于心血管遗传疾病队列中个体的动态同意和参与的网络应用程序。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):61-68. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01454-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.权衡永生数据的利弊:个人基因组计划中参与者对开放式同意的看法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb;46(1):36-45. doi: 10.1002/hast.523. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
4
Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent.基因组研究与数据挖掘技术:对个人隐私和知情同意的影响。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(1):15-28. doi: 10.1023/b:etin.0000036156.77169.31.
5
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
6
The preferences of potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research regarding consent procedures and information delivery.精神科基因组研究中潜在利益相关者对同意程序和信息传递的偏好。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Collections of Genetic Heritage: The Legal, Ethical and Practical Considerations of a Dynamic Consent Approach to Decision Making.澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的遗传遗产收集:动态同意决策方法的法律、伦理和实际考量
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):205-217. doi: 10.1177/1073110520917012.
8
An e-consent framework for tiered informed consent for human genomic research in the global south, implemented as a REDCap template.一个用于全球南方人类基因组研究分层知情同意的电子知情同意框架,作为 REDCap 模板实施。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 24;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00860-2.
9
Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?基因组研究结果在医疗记录中的自动录入:研究人员有责任吗?参与者应有选择权吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):827-42. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12323.
10
Expanding the boundaries of previously obtained informed consent in research: Views from participants in the Personalised Risk-based Mammascreening study.在研究中扩大先前获得的知情同意的范围:来自个性化风险基础的 Mammascreening 研究参与者的观点。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1308-1317. doi: 10.1111/hex.13746. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities for a national genomic data governance framework in Australia: a systematic review.澳大利亚国家基因组数据治理框架的机遇:一项系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 14;26(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01273-7.
2
Informed Consent for Newborn Genomic Screening: Interest-Holder Perspectives on Dynamic Consent in an Evolving Landscape.新生儿基因组筛查知情同意书:利益相关者对不断变化形势下动态同意的看法。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2025 May 28;11(2):41. doi: 10.3390/ijns11020041.
3
Enhancing diagnostic outcomes in kidney genetic disorders: the KidGen national kidney genomics study protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Authority and the Future of Consent in Population-Level Biomedical Research.群体层面生物医学研究中的同意权与未来
Public Health Ethics. 2019 Oct 30;12(3):225-236. doi: 10.1093/phe/phz015. eCollection 2019 Nov.
2
Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.迈向“参与2.0”:一项关于生物样本库参与者动态同意的研究见解
Digit Health. 2015 Sep 28;1:2055207615605644. doi: 10.1177/2055207615605644. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.
提高肾脏遗传疾病的诊断结果:KidGen国家肾脏基因组学研究方案
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Feb 3;26(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03926-y.
4
Biobank Digitalization: From Data Acquisition to Efficient Use.生物样本库数字化:从数据采集到高效利用
Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;13(12):957. doi: 10.3390/biology13120957.
5
A multitiered analysis platform for genome sequencing: Design and initial findings of the Australian Genomics Cardiovascular Disorders Flagship.用于基因组测序的多层分析平台:澳大利亚基因组学心血管疾病旗舰项目的设计与初步发现
Genet Med Open. 2024 Mar 25;2:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101842. eCollection 2024.
6
Integrating population-based biobanks: Catalyst for advances in precision health.整合基于人群的生物样本库:精准健康进步的催化剂。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Nov 5;24:690-698. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.10.049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies.参与者对纵向队列研究的参与度:来自一系列妊娠与分娩、双胞胎及基于家庭的人群队列研究的定性见解
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 3;24(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02419-8.
8
Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.澳大利亚团结健康倡议(ATHENA)项目动态知情同意平台开发的启示:访谈和调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 6;8:e57165. doi: 10.2196/57165.
9
Data protection legislation in Africa and pathways for enhancing compliance in big data health research.非洲的数据保护立法和加强大数据健康研究合规性的途径。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Oct 15;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01230-7.
10
Opportunities and challenges of a dynamic consent-based application: personalized options for personal health data sharing and utilization.动态同意制应用的机遇与挑战:个性化选择实现个人健康数据的共享和利用。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 31;25(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01091-3.